Mismatch response in preterm and asphyxic neonates: a functional electrophysiological investigation of attention and habituation

References

• Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):445–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laptook AR. Birth asphyxia and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2016;43(3):529–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(6):329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietz J, Peter J, Graf R, et al. Physical growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of nonhandicapped low-risk children born preterm. Early Hum Dev. 2004;79(2):131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schie PE, Schijns J, Becher JG, et al. Long-term motor and behavioral outcome after perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2015;19(3):354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetta F, Conti G, Mercuri E. Auditory processing in infancy: do early abnormalities predict disorders of language and cognitive development? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(12):1085–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson PJ, Cheong JL, Thompson DK. The predictive validity of neonatal MRI for neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm children. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(2):147–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola K, Kushnerenko E, Partanen E, et al. Auditory event-related potentials and cognitive function of preterm children at five years of age. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(7):1494–1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette N, Vannasing P, Tremblay J, et al. Early electrophysiological markers of atypical language processing in prematurely born infants. Neuropsychologia. 2015;79(Pt A):21–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fellman V, Kushnerenko E, Mikkola K, et al. Atypical auditory event-related potentials in preterm infants during the first year of life: a possible sign of cognitive dysfunction? Pediatr Res. 2004;56(2):291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiacchi PS, Mento G, Suppiej A. Cortical auditory processing in preterm newborns: an ERP study. Biol Psychol. 2009;82(2):176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellman V, Huotilainen M. Cortical auditory event-related potentials in newborn infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(6):452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheour M, Leppanen PH, Kraus N. Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for investigating auditory discrimination and sensory memory in infants and children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(1):4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe JJ. The encephalopathy of prematurity-brain injury and impaired brain development inextricably intertwined. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009;16(4):167–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;48(2):179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naatanen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, et al. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(12):2544–2590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasawa K. Mismatch negativity in healthy neonates and premature babies. In: Sawaguchi T, editor. infant death syndrome. Tokyo: Springer; 2014. p. 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizerische Gesellschaft für NeonatologieTherapeutische Hypothermie bei Neonataler Encephalopathie: Einschlusskriterien 2010 (in German); 2010. Available from: https://www.neonet.unibe.ch/legacy/asp/flow_chart_einschlusskriterien_D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soskins M, Rosenfeld JP, Niendam T. Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis: complex vs. simple paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;40(2):173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächler A, Baumann T, Jenni O, et al. Checklisten Vorsorgeuntersuchungen 4. Auflage 2011 Revidiert und aktualisiert im Auftrag der SGP (in German). Swiss Society of Paediatrics. 2011/2012;Rev.2.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng YY, Wu HC, Tzeng YL, et al. Feature-specific transition from positive mismatch response to mismatch negativity in early infancy: mismatch responses to vowels and initial consonants. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;96(2):84–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haden GP, Nemeth R, Torok M, et al. Mismatch response (MMR) in neonates: beyond refractoriness. Biol Psychol. 2016;117:26–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Cheng Q, Li H, et al. Evaluation of auditory perception development in neonates by quantitative electroencephalography and auditory event-related potentials. PLOS One. 2017;12(9):e0183728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Taylor MJ. Electrophysiological evaluation of human brain development. Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;31(3):249–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethapathy J, Boominathan P, Uppunda AK, et al. Auditory brainstem response in very preterm, moderately preterm and late preterm infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;111:119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DL, Elmasian R. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65(6):447–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muenssinger J, Stingl KT, Matuz T, et al. Auditory habituation to simple tones: reduced evidence for habituation in children compared to adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutschler I, Wieckhorst B, Speck O, et al. Time scales of auditory habituation in the amygdala and cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(11):2531–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alahmadi N, Evdokimov SA, Kropotov YJ, et al. Different resting state EEG features in children from Switzerland and Saudi Arabia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key AP, Lambert EW, Aschner JL, et al. Influence of gestational age and postnatal age on speech sound processing in NICU infants. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(5):720–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata S, Katayama R, Kinoshita M, et al. Region-specific growth restriction of brain following preterm birth. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu LL, Zhang X, Zhou GL, et al. Meta-analysis found that studies may have overestimated Caesarean section risks for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by ignoring confounding factors. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(2):258–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chojnacki MR, Holscher HD, Balbinot AR, et al. Relations between mode of birth delivery and timing of developmental milestones and adiposity in preadolescence: a retrospective study. Early Hum Dev. 2019;129:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HR, Jung KY, Kim SY, et al. Delivery modes and neonatal EEG: spatial pattern analysis. Early Hum Dev. 2003;75(1-2):35–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber P, Depoorter A, Hetzel P, et al. Habituation as parameter for prediction of mental development in healthy preterm infants: an electrophysiological pilot study. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(14):1591–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morr ML, Shafer VL, Kreuzer JA, et al. Maturation of mismatch negativity in typically developing infants and preschool children. Ear Hear. 2002;23(2):118–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depoorter A, Fruh J, Herrmann K, et al. Predicting neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm born infants using auditory event-related potentials: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;89:99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar