References
- ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–e127.
- Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1656–1662.
- Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–1232.
- Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589.
- Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, et al. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1365–1373.
- Metz TD, Allshouse AA, Faucett AM, et al. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):948–952.
- Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1143–1147.
- Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(4):938–941.
- Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(4):1223–1228.
- Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):12–20.
- Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(1):5–19.
- Dombrowski M, Illuzzi JL, Reddy UM, et al. Trial of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries: patient and hospital characteristics and birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(1):109–117.
- Hendler I, Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(2):273–277.
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2018. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2019 [cited 2020 October 10]. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm
- Parsons L. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. Presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference; 2001; Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349.
- PubMed. Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate. Bethesda (MD): PubMed; 2013 [cited 2020 October 9]. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26046963/
- Schoendorf KC, Branum AM. The use of United States vital statistics in perinatal and obstetric research. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):911–915.
- ACOG committee opinion 748 summary: the importance of vital records and statistics for the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):537–538.
- Martin JA, Wilson EC, Osterman MJK, et al. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2003;62(2):1–19.
- Xu X, Lee HC, Lin H, et al. Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):98.e1–98.e14.
- Grimes DA, Schulz KF. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):920–927.
- Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.
- Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv Outc Res Methodol. 2001;2(3–4):169–188.