References
- Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief. 2014;155:1–8.
- Falciglia GH, Grobman WA, Murthy K. Variation in labor induction over the days of the week. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(1):107–112.
- Glantz JC. Obstetric variation, intervention, and outcomes: doing more but accomplishing less. Birth. 2012;39(4):286–290.
- American College of O, Gynecologists' Committee on Patient S, Quality I. Committee Opinion No. 680: the use and development of checklists in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. 128(5):e237–e240.
- Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):480 e1–e5.
- Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, et al. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):105 e1–e7.
- Committee On Patient S, Quality I. Committee Opinion No. 629: clinical guidelines and standardization of practice to improve outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):1027–1029.
- Hehir MP, Mackie A, Robson MS. Simplified and standardized intrapartum management can yield high rates of successful VBAC in spontaneous labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(12):1504–1508.
- Thuzar M, Malabu UH, Tisdell B, et al. Use of a standardised diabetic ketoacidosis management protocol improved clinical outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;104(1):e8–e11.
- Hamm RSS, Levine LD. A standardized labor induction protocol: impact on racial disparities in obstetric outcomes. AJOG MFM. 2020;2(3):100148.
- Levine LD, Downes KL, Hamm RF, et al. Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019:1–8. DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1680629
- Levine LD, Downes KL, Parry S, et al. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):254.e1–e7.
- Frigoletto FD, Jr., Lieberman E, Lang JM, et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(12):745–750.
- Gerhardstein LP, Allswede MT, Sloan CT, et al. Reduction in the rate of cesarean birth with active management of labor and intermediate-dose oxytocin. J Reprod Med. 1995;40(1):4–8.
- Lopez-Zeno JA, Peaceman AM, Adashek JA, et al. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(7):450–454.
- O'Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63(4):485–490.
- Peaceman AM, Socol ML. Active management of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):363–368.
- Abukhalil IK, Aiken J, Persad V, et al. Can the frequency of vaginal examinations influence the duration of labour? A prospective randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;16(1):22–25.
- Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, et al. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7(7):CD010088.
- Dabagh-Fekri S, Amiri-Farahani L, Amini L, et al. A survey of Iranian primiparous women's perceptions of vaginal examination during labor. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:215013272094051.
- Hassan SJ, Sundby J, Husseini A, et al. The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women's feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences. Reprod Health. 2012;9:16.