Translation of the UK-Birth-Satisfaction-Scale-Revised (BSS-R) into Brazilian (Portuguese) and description of initial measurement properties

References

• Macedo JG, Arraes R. Autonomy of pregnant women in choosing childbirth in the reality of providing Brazilian medical and hospital care. In: VII Health Sociology Day – Health as object of knowledge: History and Culture. Curitiba, Brazil.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brenes AC. History of parturition in Brazil, 19th. Cad Saúde Pública. 1991;7(2):135–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanardo GLP, Uribe MC, Nadal AHR, et al. Obstetric violence in Brazil: a narrative review. Psicol Soc. 2017;29:e155043.
   Google Scholar
• Güngör I, Beji NK. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth. Midwifery. 2012;28(3):348–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, et al. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(81):81–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, et al. Measures of satisfaction with care during labor and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-Garcia J, et al. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akca A, Corbacioglu E, Ozyurek ES, et al. The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1127–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinic K. Understanding and promoting birth satisfaction in new mothers. Am J Maternal/Child Nurs. 2017;42(4):210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks F, Pantoja L, Ortiz J, et al. Labor and birth care satisfaction associated with medical interventions and accompaniment during labor among Chilean women. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017;62(2):196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs, Technology Management and Incorporation Department in Health. National guidelines for normal delivery care. Brasilia: Ministry of Health; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nilver H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardavaki Z, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Construct and content validity of the Greek version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (G-BSS). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2015;33(5):488–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa-Leiker C, Fleming S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) for US mothers. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2015;33(5):504–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serhatlıoğlu SG, Karahan N, Hollins Martin CJ, et al. Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (TBSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(3): 235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(1):42–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, et al. Spanish validation and structure factor of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvirsky V, Taubman-Ben-Ari O, Hollins Martin CJ, et al. Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labor. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(2):214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, et al. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): a validation study in Iranian mothers. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;34(11):1827–1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. ICHOM Standard set for pregnancy and childbirth. 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 2]. Available from: http://www.ichom.org/medical-conditions/pregnancy-and-childbirth/
   Google Scholar
• de Oliviera Costa DD, Ribeiro VS, Ribeiro MRC, et al. Psychometric properties of the hospital birth satisfaction scale: birth in Brazil survey. Cad Public Health. 2019;35(8):00154918.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes F, Carvas Junior N, Nakamura MU, et al. Psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Cross-cultural Scale. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med. 2019:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz B, Barbosa R. Problematizing childbirth care: care or violence? [Abstract]. In Memories International Convention on Public Health, Cuba Health 2012. Habana: Ministry of Public Health of Cuba; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Red Birth of the Principle. Obstetric violence “Parirás com dor” – dossier prepared for the CPMI on violence against women. Brasilia, DF: Federal Senate; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle Rive: Prentice-Hill; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Yang FM. Measurement and the measurement of change. China: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, et al. The Brazilian version of STarT Back Screening Tool – translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(5):453–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez BR, Oliveira JC, Vieira KVSG, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the foot posture index (FPI-6) – Brazilian version. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(1):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson E. Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology. 2009;61(2):29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: PNAD Contínua. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Nespoli A, Colciago E, Pedroni S, et al. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R): process of translation and adaptation in an Italian context. Ann Ist Super Toilet. 2018;54(4):340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, et al. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrade CJ, Baccelli MS, Benincasa M. The mother–baby bond in the postpartum period: a Winnicottian analysis. Bond. 2017;14(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Master MSM, et al. Welcoming in the health care of women in the postpartum period. Cad Public Health. 2017;33(3):00136215.
   Google Scholar