Cesarean delivery at term for non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing: risk factors and predictability

References

• Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, et al. Managing nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns before cesarean delivery. Compliance with ACOG recommendations. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:995–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, et al. Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2003;58:337–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, et al.; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Beydoun H, Hammad IA, et al. Indications for cesarean sections at >34 weeks among nulliparous women and differential composite maternal and neonatal morbidity. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;121(11):1395–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JA, Hankins ME, Wang Y, et al. Prolonged fetal heart rate decelerations in labor: can we reduce unplanned primary cesarean sections in this group? Adv Ther. 2020;37:4325–4335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcroft CJ, Graham EM, Aina-Mumuney A, et al. Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval, and the 30-minute rule for emergency cesareans. J Perinatol. 2005;25(4):229–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Regt RH, Marks K, Joseph DL, et al. Time from decision to incision for cesarean deliveries at a community hospital. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):625–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, et al. The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):224.e1-6–224.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds JK, Yehezkel R, Liao X, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in primary, unscheduled cesarean deliveries among low-risk primiparous women at an academic medical center: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, et al.; for the Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:326.e1–326.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al.; STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Jung EJ, et al. Management of clinical chorioamnionitis: an evidence-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223:848–869. S0002-9378(20)31167-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration – relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Ramón AM, Rodríguez-González A, Serra-Burriel M, et al. It's about time: cesarean sections and neonatal health. J Health Econ. 2018;59:46–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palatnik A, Grobman WA, Hellendag MG, et al. Predictors of shoulder dystocia at the time of operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:624.e1-624–e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 116: management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1232–1240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA. Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):CD000013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pullen KM, Riley ET, Waller SA, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous terbutaline vs nitroglycerin for acute intrapartum fetal resuscitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(4):414.e1-6–414.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magann EF, Cleveland RS, Dockery JR, et al. Acute tocolysis for fetal distress: terbutaline versus magnesium sulphate. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;33(4):362–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon ML, Gorenberg DM, Nageotte MP, et al. The effect of maternal oxygen administration on fetal pulse oximetry during labor in fetuses with non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):735–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1362–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, et al. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(12):975–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Woddring TC, et al. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. Am J Obstet Gyencol. 2008;199:623–6e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of the NICHD 3-tier fetal heart rate interpretation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:378–3e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Roach H, Naef RW, 2nd, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference? J Reprod Med. 1997;42(6):347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousleiman S, Rouse DJ, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, et al. Decision to incision and risk for fetal acidemia, low Apgar Scores, and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Am J Perinatol. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolcher MC, Johnson RL, El-Nashar SA, et al. Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):536–548.0020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar