Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Fritsch H. Ein Fall von volligen Schwund der Gebaumutterhohle nach Auskratzung. Zentralbl Gynaekol. 1894;18:1337–1342.
   Google Scholar
• Asherman JG. Amenorrhoea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1948;55(1):23–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asherman JG. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1948;57(6):892–896.
   Google Scholar
• Deans R, Abbot J. Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(5):555–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer W. Role of uterine adhesions in the cause of multiple pregnancy losses. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29(4):912–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):262–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Vercellini P, Viezzoli T, et al. Intrauterine adhesions: current diagnostic and therapeutic trends. Acta Eur Fertil. 1986;17(1):31–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(5):593–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker JG. Etiology of and therapeutic approach to synechia uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65(1):109–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westendorp IC, Ankum WM, Mol BW, et al. Prevalence of Asherman’s syndrome after secondary removal of placental remnants or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortion. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(12):3347–3350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Inany H. Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(11):986–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(6 Pt 1):1459–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capella-Allouc S, Morsad F, Rongières-Bertrand C, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequentfertility. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1230–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas A, Shushan A, Magos A. Myometrial scoring: a new technique for themanagement of severe Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(5):860–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PabuçCu R, Urman B, Atay V, et al. Hysteroscopictreatment of intrauterine adhesions is safe and effective in the restoration of normal menstruation and fertility. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(6):1141–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson AJM, Abbot JA, Kingston A, et al. Fluoroscopically guided for patients with Ashmerman’s syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez H, Al-Najjar F, Chauveaud-Lambling A, et al. Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(5):398–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer IM, Abd-El-Maeboud KHI, Abdelfatah I, et al. Human Amnion as a temporary biologic barrier after hysteroscopic lysis of severe intrauterine adhesions: pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(5):605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers EM, Hurst BS. Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(1):160–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Duan H, Wang Y. Clinical characteristics and reproductiove outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of patients with intra uterine adhesions - a retrospective stud. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(2):144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai H, Qiao L, Song KJ, et al. Oxidized, regenerated cellulose adhesions barrier plus intrauterine device prevents recurrence after adhesiolysis for moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DL, Felker RE, Emerson DS. Intrauterine shelves in pregnancy: sonographic observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(4):821–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randel SB, Filly RA, Callen PW, et al. Amniotic sheets. Radiology. 1988;166(3):633–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball RH, Buchmeier SE, Longnecker M. Clinical significance of sonographically detected uterine synechiae in pregnant patients. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16(7):465–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo EJ, Chung JPW, Poon LCY, et al. Reproductive outcomes after surgical treatment of Asherman syndrome: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:98–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perined, Perinatale zorg in Nederland anno 2018: landelijke perinatale cijfers en duiding, Utrecht 2019. Available from: https://assets.perined.nl/docs/fc23b860-a5ff-4ef6-b164-aedf7881cbe3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamsteker K. ESH classification of intra-uterine adhesions (IUA)- grade extent of intrauterine adhesions. In: European society of hysteroscopy – membership directory 1990–1991; p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsteker K, DeBlok SJ. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation. In: Sutton C, Diamon M, editors. Endoscopic surgery for gynecologist. New York (NY): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 1995. p. 263–276.
   Google Scholar
• March CM, Israel R, March AD. Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;130(6):653–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer G. meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 2007;7(3):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Soft. 2010;36(3):1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, et al. Asherman syndrome-one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):759–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhang H, Wang Q, et al. Reproductive outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: experience from the largest women’s hospital in China. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24(2):299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanad AS, Aboulfotouh ME. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: efficacy and safety. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(2):411–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy KK, Baruah J, Bhagwan Sharma J, et al. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(2):355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui YYC, Lau MSK, Ng GYN, et al. Clinical and reproductive outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman Syndrome in an Asian population. Ann Academy Med. 2018;47(1):36–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heineman MJ. Obstetry en Gynaecology, de voortplanting van de mens. Singapore (Singapore): Reed Bussines; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm F, Friden B, Milsom IA, et al. Prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after termination of pregnancy: a systematic review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(4):329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March CM. Intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22(3):491–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAGL Elevating Gynecologic Surgery. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines on intrau-terine adhesions developed in collaboration with the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok HS, Van Asselt KM, Van der Schouw YT, et al. Subfertility reflects accelerated ovarian ageing. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):644–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt KM, Kok HS, Pearson PL, et al. Heritability of menopausal age in mothers and daughters. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(5):1348–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt KM, Kok HS, Putter H, et al. Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative trait loci influencing variation in human menopausal age. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(3):444–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar