Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton multiparous women: a prospective cohort study

References

• Muglu J, Rather H, Arroyo-Manzano D, et al. Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: a systematic review and meta- analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies. PLoS Med. 2019;16(7):e1002838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD004945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4):304–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, et al. Elective Induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):282–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh AR, Skeith AE, Sargent JA, et al. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(6):590.e1–590.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Natality public-use data 2016–2019. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2021 [cited 2021 February 12]. https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-expanded-current.html
   Google Scholar
• Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(2):169–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministero della Salute CEDAP certificato assistenza al parto [Internet]. Rome (Italy): Ministero della Salute; 2021 [cited 2021 February 12]. Available from: http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/documentazione/p6_2_2_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=2881
   Google Scholar
• Alavifard S, Meier K, Shulman Y, et al. Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, et al. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(3):298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Simonetti B, Berghella V. Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length for prediction of spontaneous labour at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2016;123(1):16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, et al. Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(4):100193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Pietrolucci ME, Mappa I, et al. Sonoelastographic assessment of the uterine cervix in the prediction of imminent delivery in singleton nulliparous women near term: a prospective cohort study. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(3):559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC. Use of time to event analysis to estimate the normal duration of human pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1450–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Aloisio F, Yacoub M, et al. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(6):852–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Kwon H, Kwak DW, et al. Addition of cervical elastography may increase preterm delivery prediction performance in pregnant women with short cervix: a prospective study. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(9):e68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(6):715–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound. 1998;7(3):183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, et al. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(9):1391–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy R, Zaks S, Ben   ‐Arie A, et al. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(3):332–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø TM, Heien C, Økland I, et al. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head–perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, et al. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Van Holsbeke C, Van Der Tweel I, et al. Sonographic longitudinal cervical length measurements in nulliparous women at term: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):652–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar