Cardiovascular complications following cesarean section and vaginal delivery: a national population-based study

References

• Ye J, Betran AP, Guerrero Vela M, et al. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014; 41(3):237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260-70–e270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2016; 123(5):745–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, World Health Organization 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruys TP, Roos-Hesselink JW, Pijuan-Domenech A, et al. Is a planned caesarean section in women with cardiac disease beneficial? Heart. 2015;101(7):530–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, et al. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(3):CD004660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AH. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(3):326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie CA, O'Brien P. Stroke and pregnancy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008; 79(3):240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SY, Hu CJ, Lin HC. Increased risk of stroke in patients who undergo cesarean section delivery: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(4):391.e1–391.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK, et al. Risks of venous thromboembolism after cesarean sections: a meta-analysis. Chest. 2016; 150(3):572–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremme KA. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2003; 16(2):153–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-33–e333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson P, Narous M, Firoz T, WHO Maternal Morbidity Working Group, et al. Incidence of myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3(3):198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz RH, Cayley ML, Foley N, et al. The incidence of pregnancy-related stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2017; 12(7):687–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier AY, Molina RL. Maternal mortality in the United States: updates on trends, causes, and solutions. Neoreviews. 2019;20(10):e561–e74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006-2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, et al. Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130(2):366–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, et al. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjaerven R, et al. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb D, Goffinet F, Seco A, EPIMOMS Study Group, et al. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis. CMAJ. 2019;191(13):E352–E60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm C, Langhoff-Roos J, Petersen KB, et al. Severe postpartum haemorrhage and mode of delivery: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012; 119(5):596–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization WH. WHO technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EpC. The Swedish Medical Birth Register - A summary of content and quality 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Hälsodataregister. Medicinska födelseregistret. 2017. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/halsodataregister/medicinskafodelseregistret.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Almqvist C, Bonamy AK, et al. Registers of the Swedish total population and their use in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(2):125–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, et al. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(11):659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim MM, Souza ASR, Katz L. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10:CD009430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foulon A, Dupas JL, Sabbagh C, et al. Defining the most appropriate delivery mode in women with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(5):712–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176(4):455–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar