Middle-East OBGYN graduate education (MOGGE) foundation practice guidelines: use of labor charts in management of labor. Practice guideline no. 04-O-21

References

• Queensland Clinical Guidelines: Normal birth; 2017 [access 2020 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/142007/g-normalbirth.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization X. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman EA. JAJoO, Gynecology. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68(6):1568–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Intrapartum Care: care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lee L, Dy J, Azzam H. Management of spontaneous labour at Term in Healthy Women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(9):843–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario SK. Reevaluation of Friedman's labor curve: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33(6):713–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Cuthbert A, Smyth RM. Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(8):CD005461.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Rifai RH. Trend of caesarean deliveries in Egypt and its associated factors: evidence from national surveys, 2005–2014. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton R, Burton AE, Kumar P, et al. Cesarean delivery: trend in indications over three decades within a major city hospital network. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):909–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Service (NHS). Completion of the partogram in pregnancy. Version 5.0; 2018. Available from: https://www.mse.nhs.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, et al. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(1):43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick JH. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaert L. The partogram. JJSAMJ. 2008;93(11):830.
   Google Scholar
• Abalos E, Chamillard M, Díaz V, et al. Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;67:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Romero R, Nygaard I. Giants in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman EA. A graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1956;8(6):691–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodesch F, Ehman-Ellinger C, Wilkin P, et al. Introduction, use and results of a new partogram. BJOG Int J O&G. 1965;72(6):930–935.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. I. The alert line for detecting abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79(7):592–598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studd J. Partograms and nomograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour. Br Med J. 1973;4(5890):451–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Lancet. 1994;343:1399–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman S, Atallah F, Nizard J, et al. A novel partogram for stages 1 and 2 of labor based on fetal head station measured by ultrasound: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Am J Perinatol. 2020. DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1702989
   Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Windus L. Completion of the Partogram in Pregnancy no. 09046 v. 5.0. Mid Essex Hospital - NHS foundation trust; 2018 [access 2020 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.meht.nhs.uk/about-us-/policies-and-guidelines/?assetdet82735=11277&p=13.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical guideline [CG190]: Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.
   Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Hart A, Smyth RMD. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD005461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Souza JP, Oladapo OT, Fawole B, et al. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study. BJOG. 2018;125(8):991–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattinson R, Howarth G, Mdluli W, et al. Aggressive or expectant management of labour: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2003;110(5):457–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonet M, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the partograph alert and action lines to predict adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2019;126(13):1524–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladapo OT, Diaz V, Bonet M, et al. Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(8):944–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. VI. Arrest of descent in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(2):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer AR, Evans J, Bailey SM, et al. A second-stage partogram. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):678–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu JK, Buchmann EJ, Basu DJA. Role of a second stage partogram in predicting the outcome of normal labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(2):158–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi S, Upadhyay S, De Costa A, et al. Implementation of the partograph in India's JSY cash transfer programme for facility births: a mixed methods study in Madhya Pradesh province. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A, Fb DA, W, Ejigu T. Assessment of knowledge and utilization of the partograph among health professionals in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Sci J Clin Med. 2013;2(2):26.
   Google Scholar
• Wakgari N, Tessema GA, Amano A. Knowledge of partograph and its associated factors among obstetric care providers in North Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yisma E, Dessalegn B, Astatkie A, et al. Knowledge and utilization of partograph among obstetric care givers in public health institutions of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asibong U, Okokon IB, Agan TU, et al. The use of the partograph in labor monitoring: a cross-sectional study among obstetric caregivers in General Hospital, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:873–880.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fawole AO, Adekanle DF, Hunyinbo KI, et al. Utilization of the partograph in primary health care facilities in southwestern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13(2):200–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe T, Ncham E, Takang W, et al. Use of the partogram in the Bamenda health district, north-west region, Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Obstet Res Open J. 2016;2(5):102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Khonje M. Use and documentation of Partograph in urban hospitals in Lilongwe - Malawi: health workers perspective: a cross sectional study on use and documentation of partograph and factors that prevent optimal utilization of the partograph: perspectives of health workers at Bwaila and Ethel Mutharika Maternity Units in Lilongwe - Malawi; 2012. Available from: http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-31361.
   Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Omoni G, Lee K, et al. Students’ experiences of using the partograph in Kenyan labour wards. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;5(3):117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Nyamtema AS, Urassa DF, Massawe S, et al. Partogram use in the Dar es Salaam perinatal care study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100(1):37–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sama CB, Takah NF, Danwe VK, et al. Knowledge and utilization of the partograph: a cross-sectional survey among obstetric care providers in urban referral public health institutions in northwest and southwest Cameroon. PloS One. 2017;12(2):e0172860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayenew AA. Zewdu Bf Partograph utilization as a decision-making tool and associated factors among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 9(1):251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Khalid A, Paul K, et al. prasavGraph: an android-based e-partograph. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB). IEEE; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hadi SPI, Kuntjoro T, Sumarni S, et al. The development of e-partograph module as a learning platform for midwifery students: the ADDIE model. BNJ. 2017;3(2):148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Tadesse Y, Gelagay AA, Tilahun B, et al. Willingness to use mobile based e-partograph and associated factors among care providers in north gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia. Online J Public Health Inform. 2019;11(2):e10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahman A, Begum T, Ashraf F, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of electronic vs. paper partograph on improving birth outcomes: a prospective crossover study design. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0222314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(4):824–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian JA. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery: ACOG and SMFM change the game. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(3).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Misguided guidelines for managing labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):753.e1–753.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbye R, Bernitz S, Olsen IC, et al. The Labor Progression Study: the use of oxytocin augmentation during labor following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph in a cluster randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(9):1187–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernitz S, Dalbye R, Zhang J, et al. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbye R, Blix E, Frøslie KF, et al. The Labour Progression Study (LaPS): duration of labour following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph - a cluster randomised trial. Midwifery. 2020;81:102578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):689.e1–689.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolba SM, Ali SS, Mohammed AM, Michael AK, et al. Management of spontaneous labor in primigravidae: labor scale versus WHO Partograph (SLiP trial) randomized controlled trial. Amer J Perinatol. 2018;35(01):048–054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar