757
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adapted ST analysis during labor: relative versus absolute ST events, a case-control study

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 7375-7380 | Received 21 Oct 2020, Accepted 25 Jun 2021, Published online: 25 Jul 2021

References

  • Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD006066.
  • Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Norén H, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9281):534–538.
  • Schuit E, Amer-Wahlin I, Ojala K, et al. Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(3):187.e1–187.e13.
  • Greene KR, Dawes GS, Lilja H, et al. Changes in the ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with hypoxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(8):950–958.
  • Sundstrom AK, Rosen D, Rosen KG. Fetal surveillance. Sweden: Neoventa Medical AB; 2000.
  • FIGO subcommittee on Standards on Perinatal Medicine. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987;25:159–167.
  • Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1191–1193.
  • Kwee A, Dekkers AHS, van Wijk HPJ, et al. Occurrence of ST-changes recorded with the STAN S21-monitor during normal and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns during labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):28–34.
  • Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-De-Campos D, et al. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;57(1):33–37.
  • Vullings R, Verdurmen KMJ, Hulsenboom ADJ, et al. The electrical heart axis and ST events in fetal monitoring: a post-hoc analysis following a multicentre randomised controlled trial. PLOS One. 2017;12(4):e0175823–11.
  • Hulsenboom ADJ, Verdurmen KMJ, Vullings R, et al. Relative versus absolute rises in T/QRS ratio by ST analysis of fetal electrocardiograms in labour: a case-control pilot study. PLOS One. 2019;14(3):e0214357.
  • Becker JH, Kuipers LJM, Schuit E, et al. Predictive value of the baseline T-QRS ratio of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(2):189–197.
  • Van Laar J, Peters CHL, Vullings R, et al. Fetal autonomic response to severe acidaemia during labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(4):429–437.
  • Rothman KJ. Episheet: spreadsheets for the analysis of epidemiological data. Version of October 25, 2011. 2011. Available from: http://krothman.hostbyet2.com
  • Westerhuis MEMH, Kwee A, van Ginkel AA, et al. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1194–1201.
  • Westerhuis MEMH, Van Horen E, Kwee A, et al. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG. 2009;116(4):545–551.
  • Fotiadou E, van Laar JOEH, Oei SG, et al. Enhancement of low-quality fetal electrocardiogram based on time-sequenced adaptive filtering. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018;56(12):2313–2323.