Performance of the cervical shortening for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in uncomplicated twins

References

• Iams JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindinger LM, Poon LC, Cacciatore S, et al. The effect of gestational age at cervical length measurements in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual patient level Meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;123(6):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, levels & trends in child mortality: Report 2017, Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Pittini A, Hiersch L, et al. Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):616.e1–616.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyamfi C, Lerner V, Holzman I, et al. Routine cervical length in twins and perinatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(1):65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e131–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshey EJ, Quiñones JN, Rochon M, et al. Comparison of management options for twin pregnancies with cervical shortening. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;26:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh E, Rebarber A, Oppal S, et al. The association between maternal biomarkers and pathways to preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(5):504–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):330–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2020 April 2]. Available from: http://www.fasgo.org.ar/archivos/consensos/embgemelar.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pagani G, Stagnati V, Fichera A, et al. Cervical length at mid gestation for the screening of preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(1):56–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquini L, Sisti G, Nasioudis D, et al. Ability of cervical length to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies using the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and an a priori cut-off value. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(5):562–565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pregnancies: a French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1596–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester AE, Ankumah NE, Chauhan SP, et al. Twin transvaginal cervical length at 16–20 weeks and prediction of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;8:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeister C, Brizot ML, Liao A, et al. Two-stage transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:479–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroz LA, Brock CO, Govindappagari S, et al. Association between change in cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):159.e1–e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meller C, Izbizky G, Aiello H, et al. Cervical-length as a screening for spontaneous preterm birth in uncomplicated twins: one vs. serial measurements. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;2020:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):789–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National institute of child health and human development maternal fetal medicine unit network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11(1):71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levêque C, Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, Chauvet MP, Maillard F, Elhinger V, Arnaud C; Research Group in Obstetrics and Gynecology (GROG). Cervical length in asymptomatic twin pregnancies: prospective multicenter comparison of predictive indicators. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(1):37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil MI, Alzahrani MH, Ullah A. The use of cervical length and change in cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;169(2):193–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh KJ, Park KH, Jeong EH, et al. The change in cervical length over time as a predictor of preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies who have a normal mid-trimester cervical length. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012;15(4):516–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox NS, Rebarber A, Roman AS, et al. Association between second-trimester cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(12):1733–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson JL, Macara LM, Owen P, Young D, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observation study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):561–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby MD. Bricker L on behalf of the royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy. Bjog. 2016;124:e1–e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the french college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisti G, Di Tommaso M. Cervical length cut-off for preterm birth prediction in twins: let’s use the fifth percentile!. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(8):1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzner O, Yagur Y, Biron-Shental T, et al. Twin pregnancies: can sonographic measurements and changes in cervical length during pregnancy predict preterm birth? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;2020:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bergelin I, Valentin L. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(6):556–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic J, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl. 3):17–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink J, Mourad M. The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: where are we now? Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(7):427–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeve YB, Potdar N, Opoku A, et al. Donor oocyte conception and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123(9):1471–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar