Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 25
Submit an article Journal homepage
329
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

EngagINg the COmmunity to Reduce Preterm birth via Adherence To an Individualized Prematurity Prevention Plan (INCORPorATe IP3): intervention development and future pilot study design

Sarahn M. Wheelera Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8384-3721View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Maya Jacksonb Mobilizing African American Mothers through Empowerment (MAAME), Inc., Durham, NC, USAView further author information
,
Kelley E. C. Massengalec Diaper Bank of North Carolina, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
,
Khaila Ramey-Collierd Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
,
Truls Østbyee Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
,
Amy Cornelif Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
,
Hayden B. Bosworthf Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA;g Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
&
Geeta K. Swamya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USAView further author information
 show all
Pages 8559-8565 | Received 17 Jun 2021, Accepted 29 Sep 2021, Published online: 18 Oct 2021

References

  • NC March of Dimes Prematurity ReportCard [Internet]. 2020 . Available from: https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/tools/reportcard.aspx?frmodrc=1®=37
  • Centers for Disease Control And Prevention (U.S.), National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.), National Vital Statistics System (U.S.). National vital statistics reports: from the centers for disease control and prevention, national center for health statistics, national vital statistics system. DHHS publication no (PHS). Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 1988.
  • Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, et al. Deaths: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;65(4):1–122.
  • Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2007.
  • Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics TACoO, Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:964–973.
  • American College of O, Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice B-O. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138:e65–e90.
  • Yee LM, Liu LY, Sakowicz A, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in use of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:374–376.
  • Timofeev J, Singh J, Istwan N, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth in African-American and Caucasian women receiving 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(1):55–60.
  • Berhie SH, Riley LE, Bryant AS. Disparities in 17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate offer and uptake in pregnancies at a risk of preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(10):1066–1071.
  • Wheeler S, DeNoble A, Wynn C, et al. Beyond the window: patient characteristics and geographic locations associated with late prenatal care in women eligible for 17-P preterm birth prevention. J Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2019;6(3):563–569.
  • Wheeler SM, Massengale KEC, Blanchard KP, et al. Improving uptake and adherence to 17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in Non-Hispanic Black women: a mixed methods study of potential interventions from the patient perspective. Biores Open Access. 2019;8(1):155–161.
  • Wheeler SM, Massengale KEC, Adewumi K, et al. Pregnancy vs. paycheck: a qualitative study of patient’s experience with employment during pregnancy at high risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):565.
  • Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2):330–339.
  • Carter EB, Ele VWC, Mazzoni SE. A paradigm shift to address racial inequities in perinatal healthcare. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(4):359–361.
  • Thomas MP, Ammann G, Brazier E, et al. Doula services within a healthy start program: increasing access for an underserved population. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(1):59–64.
  • Ricklan SJ, Cuervo I, Rebarber A, et al. Two decades of interventions in New York state to reduce maternal mortality: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(21):3514–3523.
  • Kozhimannil KB, Hardeman RR, Attanasio LB, et al. Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):e113–e121.
  • Huysman BC, Mazzoni S, Carter EB. Group prenatal care as a strategy to address diabesity. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;64(1):174–184.
  • Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):329.
  • Sperlich M, Gabriel C, St Vil NM. Preference, knowledge and utilization of midwives, childbirth education classes and doulas among U.S. black and white women: implications for pregnancy and childbirth outcomes. Soc Work Health Care. 2019;58(10):988–1001.
  • Roesch SC, Schetter CD, Woo G, et al. Modeling the types and timing of stress in pregnancy. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2004;17(1):87–102.
  • Webster J, Linnane JW, Dibley LM, et al. Measuring social support in pregnancy: can it be simple and meaningful? Birth. 2000;27(2):97–101.
  • Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer AM, Gregorich SE, et al. Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(3):1235–1256.
  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.