Which is the best ultrasound parameter for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome within 1 day of delivery?

References

• Wladimiroff JW, Vd Wijngaard JA, Degani S, et al. Cerebral and umbilical arterial blood flow velocity waveforms in normal and growth-retarded pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(5):705–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(1):115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Changes in fetal doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(3):303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A. Fetal cerebral redistribution: a marker of compromise regardless of fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):385–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata S, Nakata M, Sumie M, et al. The doppler cerebroplacental ratio predicts non-reassuring fetal status in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(10):1433–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):156–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Elsaddig M, et al. The association between fetal doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):57.e1-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):54.e1-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Doppler reference values of the fetal vertebral and middle cerebral arteries, at 19–41 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(3):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales Roselló J, Hervás Marín D, Perales Marín A. The vertebral artery doppler might be an alternative to the Middle cerebral artery doppler in the follow-up of the early onset growth-restricted fetus. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(2):109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Fornés-Ferrer V, et al. The vertebroplacental ratio as an alternative to the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of the fetus at the end of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(1):70–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, et al. Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):937–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(2):124–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, et al. Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136(1):20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraitis AA, Wood AM, Fleming M, et al. Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2):274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasak B, Koenen SV, Koster MP, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakalis S, Akolekar R, Gallo DM, et al. Umbilical and fetal Middle cerebral artery doppler at 30–34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Loscalzo G, Buongiorno S, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio and estimated fetal weight, the 2 different yardsticks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):664–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Salvi S, et al. Abnormal middle cerebral artery doppler associates with spontaneous preterm birth in normally grown fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;40(1):41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Hervás-Marín D, Perales-Marín A. Proximity of term labor deepens the fall of doppler impedance in the fetal cerebral arteries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(3):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Buongiorno S, Loscalzo G, et al. Mathematical simulation of doppler changes in late-onset smallness; progression patterns of cerebral and umbilical anomalies define two types of late-onset fetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34:2869–2879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E, et al. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:65.e1–65.e18.
   Google Scholar
• Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, van Osch IR, Heymans MW, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. BJOG. 2021;128:226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ, et al. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):401.e1–401.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleicher I, Vitner D, Iofe A, et al. When should pregnancies that extended beyond term be induced? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(2):219–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, et al. Influence of parity on fetal hemodynamics and amniotic fluid volume at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(6):688–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharey G, Gissler M, Ulander VM, et al. Risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in planned vaginal breech labors at term: a retrospective population-based case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmel MS, Bromiker R, Hammerman C, et al. The effects of maternal age and parity on maternal and neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):793–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L, Prior T, Greer R, et al. Gender specific intrapartum and neonatal outcomes for term babies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:19–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Renzo GC, Rosati A, Sarti RD, et al. Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med. 2007;4(1):19–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antonakou A, Papoutsis D. The effect of fetal gender on the delivery outcome in primigravidae women with induced labours for all indications. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:QC22–QC25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeye RL, Burt LS, Wright DL, et al. Neonatal mortality, the male disadvantage. Pediatrics. 1971;48(6):902–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simchen MJ, Weisz B, Zilberberg E, et al. Male disadvantage for neonatal complications of term infants, especially in small-for-gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(8):839–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, et al. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Alberola-Rubio J, et al. Neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses: mathematical models investigating cerebroplacental ratio and birth weight. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(1):55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar