References
- Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLOS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
- Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J-J, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–670.
- Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2005;112(4):451–455.
- Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33–40.
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 561: nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):911–915.
- Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(2):111–120.
- Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):561–569.
- Smaill FM, Gyte GM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD007482.
- Little SE, Zera CA, Clapp MA, et al. A multi-state analysis of early-term delivery trends and the association with term stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):1138–1145.
- Glavind J, Kindberg SF, Uldbjerg N, et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2013;120(9):1123–1132.
- Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):320.e1-6–320.e6.
- Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(3):252–259.
- Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):132–139.
- Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347(8997):281–284.
- Cheung VYT. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness: is it truly predictive of uterine rupture? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30(2):148–151.
- Manzanares S, Ruiz-Duran S, Pinto A, et al. An integrated model with classification criteria to predict vaginal delivery success after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(2):236–242.
- Yin Z, He W, Li Y, et al. Adaptive reduction of human myometrium contractile activity in response to prolonged uterine stretch during term and twin pregnancy. Role of TREK-1 channel. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;152:252–263.
- Bhagavath B, Ellie G, Griffiths KM, et al. Uterine malformations: an update of diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(6):377–392.
- Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National institute of child health and human development maternal fetal medicine unit network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
- Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(6):902–907.
- Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16-22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):972–978.
- Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(5):312–317.
- Vimercati A, Greco P, Lopalco P, et al. The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(4):317–321.
- Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, et al. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(6):598–603.
- Groeneveld YJ, Bohnen AM, Van Heusden AM. Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography versus bishop score to predict successful labour induction in term pregnancies. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(3):187–193.
- Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, et al. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):623–628.