Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 25
Submit an article Journal homepage
186
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Women’s and clinician’s acceptability of participation in a hypothetical obstetric randomized controlled trial: a qualitative survey

Helen C. Sherrella Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Liam T. B. Dunna Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Dell Horeyd NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;e School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-7694
ORCID Icon,
Vicki Flenadya Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;b Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Brisbane, Australia;c Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;d NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
&
Sailesh Kumara Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;b Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Brisbane, Australia;c Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;d NHMRC Stillbirth Centre for Research Excellence, Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, Brisbane, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-4811
ORCID Icon
Pages 9163-9169 | Received 01 Jun 2021, Accepted 15 Dec 2021, Published online: 29 Dec 2021

References

  • Frew PM, Saint-Victor DS, Isaacs MB, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59 (Suppl 7):S400–S407.
  • Blehar MC, Spong C, Grady C, et al. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23(1):e39–e45.
  • Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1077–1081.
  • van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Hooft L, et al. Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women's participation in research: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):350–361.
  • Badawi N, Keogh JM. Causal pathways in cerebral palsy. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(1):5–8.
  • Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–e108.
  • Hilder L, Zhichao Z, Parker M, et al. Australia's mothers and babies 2012. 30 ed. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
  • Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation. 2009;119(19):2633–2642.
  • Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, et al. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2001;322(7285):519–523.
  • NHMRC. NHMRC Funding Canberra, Australia; 2020. [cited 2020 13th May 2020]. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/funding
  • Weijters B, Baumgartner H. Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: a review. J Marketing Res. 2012;49(5):737–747.
  • O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
  • Monson M, Einerson BD, Esplin S, et al. Factors affecting obstetric patient participation in research. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):118S–118S.
  • Rodger MA, Makropoulos D, Walker M, et al. Participation of pregnant women in clinical trials: will they participate and why? Am J Perinatol. 2003;20(2):69–76.
  • Lavender T, Kingdon C. Primigravid women's views of being approached to participate in a hypothetical term cephalic trial of planned vaginal birth versus planned cesarean birth. Birth. 2009;36(3):213–219.
  • Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, et al. Willingness of pregnant women and clinicians to participate in a hypothetical randomised controlled trial comparing vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(6):542–546.
  • Dall'Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):481–487.
  • Smith GCS. Researching new methods of screening for adverse pregnancy outcome: lessons from pre-eclampsia. PLOS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001274.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.