195
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Mifepristone versus balloon catheter for labor induction: a cohort study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 9331-9335 | Received 29 Nov 2021, Accepted 17 Jan 2022, Published online: 27 Jan 2022

References

  • Gupta J, Baev O, Duro Gomez J, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol. 2021.
  • Feiteiro J, Mariana M, Verde I, et al. Genomic and nongenomic effects of mifepristone at the cardiovascular Level: A Review. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(7):976–988.
  • Sharma C, Soni A, Gupta A, et al. Mifepristone vs balloon catheter for labor induction in previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(2):241–248.
  • Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286–1287.
  • Mariana M, Feiteiro J, Cairrao E, et al. Mifepristone is a vasodilator due to the inhibition of smooth muscle cells L-Type Ca2+ channels. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(6):723–730.
  • Yelikar K, Deshpande S, Deshpande R, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral mifepristone in pre-induction cervical ripening and induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2015;65(4):221–225.
  • Heikinheimo O. Clinical pharmacokinetics of mifepristone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33(1):7–17.
  • de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(10):CD001233.
  • Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, et al. Increased single-balloon foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(9):1051–1060.
  • Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD004945.
  • Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, et al. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):177–188.
  • Gommers JSM, Diederen M, Wilkinson C, et al. Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review. Eur J Obset Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;218:73–84.
  • McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a transcervical foley catheter as a source of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):539–551.
  • Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled noninferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1619–1628.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.