Insufficient antenatal identification of fetal growth restriction leading to intrauterine fetal death: a regional population-based study in Japan

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicin. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e97–e109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wennergren M, Wennergren G, Vilbergsson G. Obstetric characteristics and neonatal performance in a four-year small for gestational age population. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:615–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(3):258–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey T, Thompson JMD, Mitchell EA, et al. Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland stillbirth study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(3):242–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski R, Hansen NI, Willinger M, et al. Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(4):e1001633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LCY, Volpe N, Muto B, et al. Birthweight with gestation and maternal characteristics in live births and stillbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frøen JF, Gardosi JO, Thurmann A, et al. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(9):801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ego A, Monier I, Skaare K, et al. Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case–control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(5):613–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(1):80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GHO | By category | Stillbirth rate - Data by country [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 15]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.STILLBIRTHv?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Koshida S, Ono T, Tsuji S, et al. Recommendations for preventing stillbirth: a regional population-based study in Japan during 2007–2011. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;235(2):145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka N. Fetal biometry and fetal weight estimation: JSUM standardization. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2002;2(3):156–161.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Minakami H, Maeda T, Fujii T, et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(6):1469–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e241–e256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiersch L, Melamed N. Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S700–S711.e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reboul Q, Delabaere A, Luo ZC, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound–delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(3):372–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Syngelaki A, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35–37 weeks’ gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):488–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarca AL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Ahn H, et al. Single and serial fetal biometry to detect preterm and term small- and large-for-gestational-age neonates: a longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0164161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, et al. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks’ gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(6):761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma E, Arnau A, Berdala R, et al. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks’ gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar