Association between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis

References

• Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Tiitinen A, et al. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequent IVF deliveries. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2252–2255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zeng Y, Huang X, et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus in invasive cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and asymptomatic women in southeast China. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2897937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Jie Shen MM, Yuan J, Zhou C-M, et al. Long-term survival report on 1313 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a hospital-based real-world study. China Oncology. 2020;30:192–198.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen P, Hakama M, Tarkkanen J, et al. Effect of type of screening laboratory on population-based occurrence of cervical lesions in Finland. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(5):732–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopracordevole F, Chiossi G, Barbero M, Surgical approach and long-term clinical outcome in women with microinvasive cervical cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(8):4345–4349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367(9509):489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nashar SA, Shazly SA, Hopkins MR, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure instead of cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(2):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Pareja R, Rendon GJ, et al. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):254–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, et al. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(3):620–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1058–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover J, Winfrey W. The effects of family planning and other factors on fertility, abortion, miscarriage, and stillbirths in the spectrum model. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(Suppl 4):775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, et al. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(11):1059–1060.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(6):467–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(1):25–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):109–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, et al. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(2):325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himes KP, Simhan HN. Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohr B, Tabor A, Frederiksen K, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(5):596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, et al. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):309–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):33.e1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, et al. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG. 2010;117(3):258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima AF, Francisco C, Júlio C, et al. Obstetric outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: six years of experience. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(4):276–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoens C, Goffin F, Simon P, et al. Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study. BJOG. 2012; 119(10):1247–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson SJ, Greig E, Michael E, et al. Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;180:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1063–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen A, Gissler M, Paavonen J, et al. Risk of preterm birth in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade one: a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo HJ, Guo RX, Liu YL. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2013;34(1):79–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Ding JX, Hua KQ. Fertility and sexual function after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Reprod Dev Med. 2019; 3(3):148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veleva G, Nikolov A, Nashar S, et al. Perinatal morbidity and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Comptes Rendus De L Academie Bulgare Des Sciences. 2019;72(3):407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi K, Itakura A, Abe T, et al. Risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery for cervical lesions: a propensity-score matching study in Japan. J Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2021;34(6):845–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maina G, Ribaldone R, Danese S, et al. Obstetric outcomes in patients who have undergone excisional treatment for high-grade cervical squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:210–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciavattini A, Clemente N, Delli Carpini G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):1043–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LCY, Savvas M, Zamblera D, et al. Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG. 2012;119(6):692–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frega A, Sesti F, De Sanctis L, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122(2):145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):504–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011;118(9):1031–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population-based cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a1343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang WQ, et al. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(17):2100–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, et al. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1232–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, et al. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. BMJ. 2014;349:g6223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratnasiri AWG, Parry SS, Arief VN, et al. Temporal trends, patterns, and predictors of preterm birth in California from 2007 to 2016, based on the obstetric estimate of gestational age. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018;4:25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conner SN, Frey HA, Cahill AG, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):752–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svare JA, Andersen LF, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. The relationship between prior cervical conization, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992;47(1):41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC, Jr., Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2002;6(2):127–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, et al. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(12):Cd001318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(6):1005–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, et al. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86(1):10–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar