Delivery mode and fetal outcome in attempted vaginal deliveries after previous cesarean section: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Finland

References

• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLOS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niino Y. The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2011;5(4):139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THL. Perinatal statistics – parturients, delivers and newborns – THL. 2018. Available from: https://thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en/statistics-and-data/data-and-services/register-descriptions/newborns
   Google Scholar
• Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Heymann WC, et al. A systematic evaluation of hospital performance of childbirth delivery modes and associated factors in the friuli venezia giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, et al. Understanding factors leading to primary cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optimal C-section rate may be as high as 19 percent to save lives of mothers and infants. News Center. 2015. [cited 2023 March 14]. Available from: http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/12/optimal-c-section-rate-may-be-as-high-as-19-percent-to-save-lives.html
   Google Scholar
• Gasim T, Jama A, Rahman FE, et al. J. Multiple repeat cesarean sections: operative difficulties, maternal complications and outcome. J Reprod Med. 2013;58(7–8):312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, et al. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin SFG, Simon AE. Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(7):1309–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai HT, Wu CH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section—The world trend and local experience in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(1):41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamilio DM, Shanks A. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) outcomes associated with increasing number of prior VBACs. Womens Health. 2008;4(3):233–236.
   Google Scholar
• Toijonen A, Hinnenberg P, Gissler M, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in the following delivery after previous preterm caesarean breech birth: a national cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(1):49–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Place K, Kruit H, Tekay A, et al. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gissler M, Shelley J. Quality of data on subsequent events in a routine medical birth register. Med Inform Internet Med. 2002;27(1):33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissler M, Teperi J, Hemminki E, et al. Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1995;23(1):75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lurie S, Ribenzaft S, Boaz M, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking during pregnancy on mode of delivery in uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(8):812–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergholt T, Skjeldestad FE, Pyykönen A, et al. Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term—A nordic register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogren I, Lindqvist M, Petersson K, et al. Maternal height and risk of caesarean section in singleton births in Sweden—A population-based study using data from the Swedish pregnancy register 2011–2016. PLOS One. 2018;13(5):e0198124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishanina E, Rogozinska E, Thatthi T, et al. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2014;186(9):665–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund J, Wiberg-Itzel E, Wallstrom T. Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. PLOS One. 2022;17(2):e0263685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, et al. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitanchez D, Yzydorczyk C, Simeoni U. What neonatal complications should the pediatrician be aware of in case of maternal gestational diabetes? World J Diabetes. 2015;6(5):734–743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knopik VS. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child outcomes: real or spurious effect? Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34(1):1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von EE, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, et al. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):1256–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin G, Tsur A, Rottenstreich A, et al. The association of vacuum-assisted delivery and shoulder dystocia among macrosomic newborns: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(1):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolens B, van den Akker T, Lule J, et al. Women’s recommendations: vacuum extraction or caesarean section for prolonged second stage of labour, a prospective cohort study in Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2019;24(5):553–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, et al. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:360.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin CE, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Zakhari A, et al. Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after caesarean delivery: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(16):2148–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemann K, Patterson JA, Nippita TA, et al. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar