The safety of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) versus elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odibo AO, Macones GA. Current concepts regarding vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(6):479–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, et al. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLOS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law LW, Pang MW, Chung TK, et al. Randomised trial of assigned mode of delivery after a previous cesarean section–impact on maternal psychological dynamics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(10):1106–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, et al. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLOS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair M, Soffer K, Noor N, et al. Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK obstetric surveillance system. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of case-control studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;25:603–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Pont S, Austin K, Ibiebele I, et al. Blood transfusion following intended vaginal birth after cesarean vs elective repeat cesarean section in women with a prior primary cesarean: a population-based record linkage study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(3):382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Diaz F, et al. Twice a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(2):161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias S, Burn R, Saunders LD. Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital. Cmaj. 1991;145(11):1459–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abitbol MM, Castillo I, Taylor UB, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: the patient’s point of view. Am Fam Physician. 1993;47(1):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(6):927–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr., et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, et al. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics. 1997;100(3 Pt 1):348–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss working group of obstetric and gynecologic institutions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(3):332–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madi JM, Deon J, Rombaldi RL, et al. [Impact of vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section on perinatal outcomes]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(11):516–522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller ES, Grobman WA. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after 2 prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):89.e81–89.e85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs CE. Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(2):507–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troyer LR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(4 Pt 1):1099–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnau GR, Scates DH, Morgan MA. The fetal-pelvic index: a method of identifying fetal-pelvic disproportion in women attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(2):353–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré E, Quiñones JN, Macones GA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG. 2006;113(1):75–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar