Differences in the incidence of obstetric complications depending on the extent and location of adenomyosis lesions

References

• Juang CM, Chou P, Yen MS, et al. Adenomyosis and risk of preterm delivery. BJOG. 2007;114(2):165–169. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01186.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto A, Iriyama T, Sayama S, et al. Adenomyosis and adverse perinatal outcomes: increased risk of second trimester miscarriage, preeclampsia, and placental malposition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(3):364–369. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1285895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochimaru A, Aoki S, Oba MS, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis with uterine enlargement. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(4):529–533. doi:10.1111/jog.12604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirgianakis K, Kalaitzopoulos DR, Schwartz ASK, et al. Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients with adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(1):185–206. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, et al. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(5):592–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A, Kyozuka H, Fujimori K, et al. Risk of preterm birth, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age infants in pregnancies with adenomyosis: a cohort study of the Japan environment and children’s study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(3):359–364. doi:10.1111/aogs.13498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YJ, Kwak DW, Chung JH, et al. The risk of preterm births among pregnant women with adenomyosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(8):1937–1943. doi:10.1002/jum.14540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura H, Kishi H, Kitade M, et al. Complications and outcomes of pregnant women with adenomyosis in Japan. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16(4):330–336. doi:10.1002/rmb2.12050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeri L, Morosetti G, Centini G, et al. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1154–1161 e3. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, et al. New sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1308–1315. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara S, Kawaguchi R, Akinishi M, et al. Subtype I (intrinsic) adenomyosis is an independent risk factor for dienogest-related serious unpredictable bleeding in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):17654. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54096-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dueholm M, Lundorf E. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(6):505–512. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f1bf00.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(1):118–131. doi:10.1002/uog.24786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):576–582. doi:10.1002/uog.19096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114 e1-7–114.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 2018;72(1):24–43. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim MG, Chiantera V, Frangini S, et al. Ultramicro-trauma in the endometrial-myometrial junctional zone and pale cell migration in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1475–1483 e1-3. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, et al. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):371–379. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1393–1401. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):343–353. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Inversetti A, Schimberni M, et al. Obstetrical complications of endometriosis, particularly deep endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):895–912. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono Y, Ota H, Takimoto K, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(7):102114. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, et al. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384. doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.512061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199(1):151–158. doi:10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, et al. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):1206–1213. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar