Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the agenesis of corpus callosum: a meta-analysis

References

• Rotmensch S, Monteagudo A, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Agenesis of the corpus callosum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):B17–B22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer EE, Mowat D. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: a clinical approach to diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C(2):184–197. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul LK, Brown WS, Adolphs R, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(4):287–299. doi: 10.1038/nrn2107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman J, Hutny M, Sztuba K, et al. Corpus callosum agenesis: an insight into the etiology and spectrum of symptoms. Brain Sci. 2020;10(9):625. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes da Cunha S, Carneiro MC, Miguel Sa M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following prenatal diagnosis of isolated corpus callosum agenesis: a systematic review. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(2):88–95. doi: 10.1159/000512534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WS, Paul LK. The neuropsychological syndrome of agenesis of the corpus callosum. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019;25(3):324–330. doi: 10.1017/S135561771800111X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio F, Pagani G, Familiari A, et al. Outcomes associated with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20160445. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakes P, Cashin A, Hurley J. Scoping review of the prenatal diagnosis of agenesis of the corpus callosum. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020;49(5):423–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo S, D'Antonio F, Homfray T, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(5):513–521. doi: 10.1002/uog.12315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels AC, Joyeux L, Brantner C, et al. Sonographic detection of Central nervous system defects in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(3):266–273. doi: 10.1002/pd.4770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sileo FG, Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, et al. Role of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated agenesis of corpus callosum in the era of fetal neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(1):7–16. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn M, Oude Rengerink K, Newsum EA, et al. Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(18):2949–2961. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(3):476–484. doi: 10.1002/uog.22145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: performance of targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(4):661–671. doi: 10.1002/uog.23616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2021. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takada T, Nishiwaki H, Yamamoto Y, et al. The role of digital rectal examination for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2015;10(9):e0136996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaicher W, Prayer D, Mittermayer C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in foetuses with bilateral moderate ventriculomegaly and suspected anomaly of the corpus callosum on ultrasound scan. Ultraschall Med. 2003;24(4):255–260. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, et al. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(4):333–340. doi: 10.1002/uog.1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald M, Lawrenz K, Deutinger J, et al. Verification of anomalies of the central nervous system detected by prenatal ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2004;25(3):214–217. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GB, Shan RQ, Ma YX, et al. Fetal Central nervous system anomalies: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis. Chin Med J. 2006;119(15):1272–1277. doi: 10.1097/00029330-200608010-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, Leung WC, et al. Foetal brain imaging: ultrasound or MRI. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and a dedicated multidisciplinary neurosonographic opinion. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(4):414–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00689.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi P, Corbitt RJ, Raffel C. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;6(4):340–345. doi: 10.3171/2010.7.PEDS09511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• We JS, Young L, Park IY, et al. Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1443–1452. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2474-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huras H, Nowak M, Herman-Sucharska I, et al. Screening performance for callosal agenesis in prenatal life. Single Center Study. Clin Imag. 2017;46:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellkvist A, Wikstrom J, Mulic-Lutvica A, et al. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs autopsy of second trimester fetuses terminated due to anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):865–876. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min AP, Zou LH. Application of prenatal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging on fetal agenesis of corpus callosum. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(3):132–136. doi: 10.5603/GP.2020.0029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanacan A, Ozgen B, Fadiloglu E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: neurosonography versus fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;250:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santirocco M, Rodo C, Illescas T, et al. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of corpus callosum anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(3):439–444. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1609931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom JI, Yaeger LH, Porat S. Reference ranges for corpus callosum and cavum septi pellucidi biometry on prenatal ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(9):2135–2148. doi: 10.1002/jum.15905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilu G, Perolo A, Falco P, et al. Ultrasound of the fetal central nervous system. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12(2):93–103. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200004000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Garel C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated posterior fossa malformations on prenatal ultrasound imaging (part 1): nomenclature, diagnostic accuracy and associated anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(6):690–697. doi: 10.1002/uog.14900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linh LT, Duc NM, Nhung NH, et al. Detecting fetal Central nervous system anomalies using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. Med Arch. 2021;75(1):45–49. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.45-49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin JE, Shin JC, Kim SJ, et al. Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound for the evaluation of fetal central nervous system anomalies. J Reprod Med. 2017;62(5–6):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1210–1211. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00724-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaicher W, Prayer D, Bernaschek G. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the assessment of the fetal central nervous system. J Perinat Med. 2003;31(6):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Role of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated anomalies of corpus callosum: multinational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(1):26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mascio D, Sileo FG, Khalil A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with mild or moderate ventriculomegaly in the era of fetal neurosonography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(2):164–171. doi: 10.1002/uog.20197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Role of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated mild or moderate ventriculomegaly in the era of neurosonography: International Multicenter Study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(3):340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang Q. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum abnormalities and follow-up analysis. J Child Neurol. 2021;36(11):1017–1026. doi: 10.1177/08830738211016253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, et al. Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: state-of-the-art. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit MC, Boekhorst F, Mancini GM, et al. Advanced genomic testing may aid in counseling of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum on prenatal ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(12):1191–1197. doi: 10.1002/pd.5158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar