Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies

References

• Liu LBR, Johnson HL, Cousens S, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–2161. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil AVY, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–263. doi:10.1002/uog.15821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obs. Gynecol. 2018;219(1):10–25. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(2):e65–e90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rosa PA, Miglioli C, Caglioni M, et al. A hierarchical procedure to select intrauterine and extrauterine factors for methodological validation of preterm birth risk estimation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–17. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03654-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senarath S, Ades A, Nanayakkara P, et al. Cervical cerclage: a review and rethinking of current practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020;75(12):757–765. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odibo A. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 142: cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):372–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):305–315. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Gonzalez R, Sepulveda W, et al. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(4 Pt 1):1086–1091. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)80043-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy MJ, Gupta A, Wothe DD, et al. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1447–1454. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.114854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Hua K. Efficacy of physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021;7(1):111–112.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Chen G, Li N. Clinical effect of emergency cervical cerclage and elective cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome in the cervical-incompetent pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(2):401–407. doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4602-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrentine MA, Stewart DJ, Ramirez MM. Use of the cervical cerclage: comparison of a community and university hospital setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):320–325. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000252707.60489.21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, et al. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):902.e1–902.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce J, Benitez L, Baños N, et al. Latency to delivery in physical examination-indicated cerclage in twins is similar to that in singleton pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(1):188–194. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl. 1):S31–S34. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Jun HA, Kim HB, et al. Interleukin-6, but not relaxin, predicts outcome of rescue cerclage in women with cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):784–789. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs RS, Blanco JD, St Clair PJ, et al. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis. 1982;145(1):1–8. doi:10.1093/infdis/145.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman A, Rochelson B, Martinelli P, et al. Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):98.e1–98.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diago Almela VJ, Martínez-Varea A, Perales-Puchalt A, et al. Good prognosis of cerclage in cases of cervical insufficiency when intra-amniotic inflammation/infection is ruled out. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2015;28(13):1563–1568. doi:10.3109/14767058.2014.960836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino Y, Makino I, Tsujioka H, et al. Amnioreduction in patients with bulging prolapsed membranes out of the cervix and vaginal orifice in cervical cerclage. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(2):140–148. doi:10.1515/JPM.2004.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli A, Vergani P, Bellini P, et al. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16(2):73–77. doi:10.1055/s-2007-993839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlin RC. Cervical incompetence, hourglass membranes, and amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54(6):748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, et al. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1130–1136. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.117680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, et al. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(2 Pt 1):221–226. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000187896.04535.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs RS, Duff P. Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(5 Pt 1):1317–1326. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90707-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(350):350ra102. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford IA, Kopkin RH, Berra AL, et al. Efficacy of different cerclage suture materials in reducing preterm birth. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020;33(20):3509–3513. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1578744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller ES, Rajan PV, Grobman WA. Outcomes after physical examination- indicated cerclage in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):46.e1–46.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays JK, Figueroa R, Shah J, et al. Amniocentesis for selection before rescue cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(5):652–655. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00633-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen M, Cao T, et al. Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;260:137–149. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1500–1507. doi:10.1056/NEJM200005183422007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diago Muñoz DM, Martínez-Varea A, Roca Prats A, et al. Diagnosis of intraamniotic inflammation by measuring vaginal interleukin-6 in patients with cervical insufficiency: could amniocentesis be avoided? J Matern Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):9303–9307. doi:10.1080/14767058.2022.2029838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar