Knowledge, attitude and perception of cesarean section among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State

References

• Office on Women’s Health. Labor and Birth. 2017. Available at https://www.womenshealth.gov/pregnancy/childbirth-and-beyond/labor-and-birth.
   Google Scholar
• Milton SH. How is labor defined? 2019. Medscape. Available at https://www.medscape.com/answers/260036-172/how-is-labor-defined.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson Memorial Health. 5 different types of childbirth and delivery methods you should know. Jan 15, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hedwige SL. Cesarean delivery. Medscape. Dec 14, 2018; Available at https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/263424-overview
   Google Scholar
• Aderinto N. Addressing maternal mortality in Nigeria. The Guardian. Feb 06, 2022; https://guardian.ng/opinion/addressing-maternal-mortality-in-nigeria/
   Google Scholar
• Sageer R, Kongnyuy E, Adebimpe WO, et al. Causes and contributory factors of maternal mortality: evidence from maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in Ogun State, Southwest, Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2202-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M, et al. Births; final data for 2018. Vital Stat. 2019;68(13):34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Influence of women’s request and preference on the rising rate of caesarean section – a comparison of reviews. Midwifery. 2020;88:102765. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox H, Callander E, Lindsay D, et al. Evidence of overuse? Patterns of obstetric interventions during labor and birth among Australian mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2369-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacqueline HW. Caesarean section: an American history of risk, technology and consequence. Baltimore: JHUP; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gedefaw G, Demmis A, Alemnew B, et al. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf. Surg. 2020;14(11):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berglundh S, Benova L, Olisaekee G, et al. Caesarean section rate in Nigeria between 2013 and 2018 by obstetric risk and socio-economic status. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2021;26(7):775–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim F, Ali N, Khan A, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four hard-to-reach areas of Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional survey. PLOS One. 2020;15(6):e0234249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn J, Ehiri J, Jacobs E, et al. Prevalence of caesarean sections in Enugu, southeast Nigeria: analysis of data from the healthy beginning initiative. PLOS One. 2017;12(3):e0174369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panti A, Nasir A, Saidu A, et al. Perception and acceptability of pregnant women towards caesarean section in Nigeria. Ejpmr. 2018;3:24–29. (
   Google Scholar
• Global, regional and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2014;385(9963):117–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeoye S, Kalu C. Pregnant Nigerian women’s view of cesarean section. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14(3):276–279. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.86766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orji E, Ogunniyi S, Onwudiegwu U. Beliefs and perceptions of pregnant women at ilesha about caesarean section. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;1(1):141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Egbodo OC, Akunaeziri UA, Edugbe AE, et al. Awareness, attitudes and perception of antenatal patients to caesarean section: the jos, Nigeria experience. IJoARGO. 2018;1(1):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Abazie OH, Abdul-Kareem AS. Pregnant women’s knowledge and perceptions of caesarean section in Lagos state, Nigeria. Afr J Midwifery. 2019;13(3):1–11. doi: 10.12968/ajmw.2018.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Prah J, Kudom A, Lasim O, et al. Knowledge, attitude and perceptions of pregnant women towards caesarean section among antenatal clinic attendants in cape Coast, Ghana. Texila Int. j. public Health. 2017;5(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Afaya R, Bam V, Apiribu F, et al. Knowledge of pregnant women on caesarean section and their preferred mode of delivery in Northern Ghana. Int J Nurs Midwifery. 2018;2(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Adewuyi EO, Auta A, Khanal V, et al. Caesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors – a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e027273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziken M, Okonofua F, Omo-Aghoja. Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstetricia at Gynecologica. 2009;86(1):42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Maduka N, Enaruna NO. Acceptance of repeat ceasarean section and its determinants among a Nigerian pregnant women population. Sahel Mej J. 2021;24(3):104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Badejo BA, Ogunseye NO, Olasunkanmi OG. Rural women and the covid-19 pandemic in Ogun state, Nigeria: an empirical study. Afr J Gov Dev. 2022;9(1.1):382–404.
   Google Scholar
• Morris E. Sampling from small populations. Available at https://uregina.ca/∼morrisev/Sociology/Sampling%20from%20small%20populations.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Laerd dissertation. Total population sampling. 2012. Available at https://dissertation.laerd.com/total-population-sampling.php.
   Google Scholar
• Isagani CC. When to use total population sampling in a research study. 2021. Available at https://discover.hubpages.com/education/When-to-use-total-population-sampling-in-a-research-study.
   Google Scholar
• Karuniawati H, Hassali AA, Suryawati S, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of antibiotic use among the population of Boyolali, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study. IJERPH. 2021;18(16):8258. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana N, Fatima S, Muzaffar T, et al. Knowledge and attitude of pregnant women reporting at tertiary care hospital. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(6):1676–1680.
   Google Scholar
• Alabi DI, Ojewale DI, Akingbade O. Antenatal care quality: pregnant women’s experiences attending a maternity teaching hospital in Ibadan Nigeria. Afr J Mid Women’s Health. 2023;17(1):1–12. doi: 10.12968/ajmw.2022.0016.
   Google Scholar
• Esan DT, Adugbo JE, Fawole IO, et al. Coping experiences of Nigerian women during pregnancy and labour: a qualitative study. Int J Comm Based Nurs Mid. 2023;11(1):23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tola YO, Akingbade O, Akinwaare MO et al. Psychoeducation for psychological issues and birth preparedness in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022; 18;2(3):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100072.
   Google Scholar
• Akingbade O, Nguyen KT, Chow KM. Effect of mHealth interventions on psychological issues experienced by women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2022;32(13–14):3058–3073. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akingbade O, Adediran V, Somoye IE, et al. Perceived feasibility and usefulness of mHealth interventions for psychoeducational support among Nigerian women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer: a focus group study. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(12):9723–9734. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07403-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar