Predicting the risks and recognizing the signs: a two-year prospective population-based study on pregnant women with uterine rupture in The Netherlands

References

• Ronel D, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, et al. Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(2):1–10. doi:10.1007/s00404-011-1977-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1042–1046. doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01052-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiliano M, Closset E, Therby D, et al. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:130–134. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, et al. Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2009;116(8):1069–1080. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barger MK, Nannini A, Weiss J, et al. Severe maternal and perinatal outcomes from uterine rupture among women at term with a trial of labor. J Perinatol. 2012;32(11):837–843. doi:10.1038/jp.2012.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, et al. The international network of obstetric survey systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country populationbased study. BJOG. 2019;126(3):370–381. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, et al. Uterine rupture and its complications in The Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128(1-2):257–261. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–1357. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchtrecht O. Available from: https://tuchtrecht.overheid.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, et al. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population‐based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG. 2007;114(10):1208–1214. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01484.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Infant outcome after complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):109.e1–e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Maternal outcome after complete uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(8):1024–1031. doi:10.1111/aogs.13579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonovová V, Hruban L, Gerychová R, et al. Uterine rupture during pregnancy and delivery: risk factors, symptoms and maternal and neonatal outcomes - restrospective cohort. Ceska Gynekol. 2019;84(2):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzounian JG, Quist-Nelson J, Miller DA, et al. Maternal and fetal signs and symptoms associated with uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(11):1270–1277. doi:10.3109/14767058.2014.954537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):169–175. doi:10.1002/uog.17568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF, et al. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):725–731. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249a1d7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossen WT, Arns-Schiere AM. Information architecture for perinatal registration in The Netherlands. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(2):310–321. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engin A. The definition and prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;960:1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_1.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markou GA, Muray JM, Poncelet C. Risk factors and symptoms associated with maternal and neonatal complications in women with uterine rupture. A 16 years multicentric experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;217:126–130. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JG, Merrill DC. Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):594–608. doi:10.1097/00003081-200609000-00019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen MM, Thisted DLA, Amer-Wåhlin I, et al. Can intrapartum cardiotocography predict uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean delivery?: A population based case-control study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0146347. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desseauve D, Bonifazi-Grenouilleau M, Fritel X, et al. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case–control study: a new time-lapse approach using a standardized classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:16–21. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar