The association of assisted reproductive technology with fetal malpresentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Walker S, Scamell M, Parker P. Standards for maternity care professionals attending planned upright breech births: a Delphi study. Midwifery. 2016;34:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Wu J, Zhang G, et al. Spontaneous cephalic version and risk factors for persistent breech presentation: a longitudinal retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):9452–9459. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2041596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Salvador S, et al. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(2):167–172. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.806891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fianu S, Václavínková V. The site of placental attachment as a factor in the aetiology of breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978;57(4):371–372. doi: 10.3109/00016347809154033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Rafael Z, Seidman DS, Recabi K, et al. Uterine anomalies. A retrospective, matched-control study. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(10):723–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toijonen AE, Heinonen ST, Gissler MVM, et al. A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case–control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):393–403. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05385-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Assisted fertilization and breech delivery: risks and obstetric management. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3205–3210. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielian PJ, Wang J, Hall MH. Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ. 1996;312(7044):1451–1453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, et al. Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors—a nationwide population based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(4):833–838. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4283-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azria E, Kayem G, Langer B, et al. Neonatal mortality and long-term outcome of infants born between 27 and 32 weeks of gestational age in breech presentation: the EPIPAGE cohort study. PLOS One. 2016;11(1):e0145768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharey G, Toijonen A, Hinnenberg P, et al. Term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent delivery: a National Cohort Study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302(1):85–91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05575-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiniger CF, Lyell DJ, Tsen LC, et al. Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0941-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Carrasco FJ, Cristóbal-Cañadas D, Gómez-Salgado J, et al. Maternal and fetal risks of planned vaginal breech delivery vs planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2022;12:04055. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Wyns C, Calhaz-Jorge C, et al. 20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium Registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(12):2832–2849. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–563. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AX, Hunt RW, Palmer KR, et al. The impact of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation induction on breech presentation: a whole of population-based cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63(3):434–440. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan S-L, Doyle P, Campbell S, et al. Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(3):778–784. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91589-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydman R, Belaisch-Allart J, Fries N, et al. An obstetric assessment of the first 100 births from the in vitro fertilization program at Clamart, France. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154(3):550–555. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90600-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269, w64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavov SS. Malpresentation of the fetus in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(B):573–576. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6450.
   Google Scholar
• Noli SA, Baini I, Parazzini F, et al. Preterm birth, low gestational age, low birth weight, parity, and other determinants of breech presentation: results from a large retrospective population-based study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9581439. doi: 10.1155/2019/9581439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern JE, Liu C-L, Cabral HJ, et al. Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsirai L, Csákány GM, Vargha P, et al. Breech presentation: its predictors and consequences. An analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer Obstetric Database (1996–2011). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(3):347–354. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojnic J, Radunovic N, Jeremic K, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(2):277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755–1761. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, et al. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(6):1077–1083. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81442-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness LA. robvis: an R package and web application for visualising risk-of-bias assessments. Github; 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 31]. Available from: https://github com/mcguinlu/robvis
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review Manager Web (RevMan Web). Version 4.6.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2022. Available at revman.cochrane.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jenabi E, Khazaei S. The association of between assisted reproduction technology and malpresentation/induction of labor: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;31(20):2782–2787. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1355905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissler M, Malin Silverio M, Hemminki E. In-vitro fertilization pregnancies and perinatal health in Finland 1991–1993. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(7):1856–1861. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workshop Group TEC. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(8):1856–1864. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, et al. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(6):1514–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Cadron I, Gerris J, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of 1655 ICSI and 3974 IVF singleton and 1102 ICSI and 2901 IVF twin births: a comparative analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61302-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja E-A, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes after frozen or fresh embryo transfer: separate analyses of singleton, twin, and sibling live births from a linked national in vitro fertilization registry. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(2):323–334. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):368–377.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, Orvos H, et al. Dilemma of increased obstetric risk in pregnancies following IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(6):216–221. doi: 10.1023/a:1024103427374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerholm UB, Bergh C. Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Ups J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):158–166. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1726534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberstein T, Levy A, Harlev A, et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(13):1316–1319. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.856415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green LK, Harris RE. Uterine anomalies. Frequency of diagnosis and associated obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(4):427–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordtveit TI, Melve KK, Albrechtsen S, et al. Maternal and paternal contribution to intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7649):872–876. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39505.436539.BE.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasupathy D, Wood AM, Pell JP, et al. Time trend in the risk of delivery-related perinatal and neonatal death associated with breech presentation at term. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(2):490–498. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar