Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish

References

• Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1996). Indices de frecuencia y vecindad ortografica para un corpus de palabras de cuatro letras. Revista Electronica de Metodolog´?a Aplicada, <i>1, 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bard, E., & Shillcock, R. (1993). Competitor effects during lexical access: Chasing Zipf's tail. In G. Altmann, & R. Shillcock (Eds), Cognitive models of speech processing: The Second Sperlonga Meeting. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, I., & Rowe, E. J. (1972). Continuous judgments of word frequency and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition:
   Google Scholar
• Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 857–871.
   Google Scholar
• Cluff, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: Retroactive effects of multiple activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 551–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for defining and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2003). Phonology, learning to read and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic analysis. In V. Csepe (Ed.), Dyslexia: Different brain, different behavior, neuropsychology and cognition, Vol. 23. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. C. (1997) Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1395- 1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., McGregor, K. K., & Thompson, C. K. (2000). Early lexical development in English- and Korean-speaking children: Language-general and language-specific patterns. Journal of Child Language, 27, 225–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J. (1987). The subjective familiarity of English homophones. Memory and Cognition, 15, 154–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298–305.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1 - 86.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulesu et al. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity & biological unity. Science, 291, 2165- 2167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Gotor, A., & Miralles, J. L. (1988). El Punto de Unicidad en el Reconocimiento de Palabras Habladas en Castellano: Un Analisis Computacional./A computational analysis of uniqueness point in Castilian spoken words. Psicologica, 9, 275–287.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., Luce, P. A., & Slowiacek, L. M. (1985). Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastia´n Galle´s, N., Mart´? Anton´?n, M. A., Carreiras Valin˜ a, M. F., & Cuetos Vega, F. (2000). Lexesp. Le´xico informatizado del espan˜ol. CD-ROM. Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S. (1996). The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 11, 333 - 341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002a). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002b). Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear. Language and Speech.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, F. M., & Miller, G. A. (1946). Some characteristics of human speech. In Transmission and reception of sounds under combat conditions. Summary Technical Report of Division 17, National Defense Research Committee. Washington, DC, pp. 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Yoneyama, K., & Johnson, K. (2001). Neighborhood effects in Japanese word recognition. Poster presented at the 141st Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Chicago, IL, USA, June, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar