What is the place of interpretation in text analysis? An example using ALCESTE® software

References

• Bart, D. 2011. L’analyse de données textuelles avec le logiciel ALCESTE. Recherches en didactiques N° 12 (2):173–84. doi:10.3917/rdid.012.0173.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., et D. A. Berry. 1988. Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist 76 (2):159–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, L. J., et D. Darlaston‐Jones. 2010. Moving beyond the enduring dominance of positivism in psychological research: Implications for psychology in Australia. Australian Psychologist 45 (1):67–76. doi:10.1080/00050060903127481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., D. Bryant-Lukosius, A. DiCenso, J. Blythe, et A. J. Neville. 2014. The Use of Triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum 41 (5):3. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, M., E. L. Ariel, N. Vaudrin, et A. F. Freedman. 2019. A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods 31 (2):116–30. doi:10.1177/1525822X19838237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devienne, C., G. Delpech, et A. Untas. 2020. La photo-expression : un outil pour accompagner le patient en éducation thérapeutique et pour évaluer son évolution. Pratiques Psychologiques 26 (2):123–39. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2019.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, N., J. Lichtlé, K. Lamore, M.-J. Orêve, et E. Cappe. 2021. Couples’ experiences of parenting a child after an autism diagnosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 51 (8):2697–710. doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04744-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estienne, L., L. Dany, E. Dudoit, F. Duffaud, et S. Salas. 2019. Spirituality and Cancer: a Qualitative Study. Édité par M. Reich et M.-F. Bacqué. Psycho-Oncologie 13 (3‑4):173–82. doi:10.3166/pson-2019-0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahault, C., S. Dolbeault, C. Sankey, et E. L. Fasse. 2018. Understanding grief in children who have lost a parent with cancer: How do they give meaning to this experience? Results of an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Death Studies 42 (8):483–90. doi:10.1080/07481187.2017.1383951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahault, C., M. Trosdorf, M. Sonrier, C. Vioulac, L. Fasse, J.-F. Timsit, S. Bailly, et M. Garrouste-Orgeas. 2021. ICU survivors experience of ICU diaries: An ancillary qualitative analysis of the ICU diary study. Critical Care Explorations 3 (5):e0384. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fossey, E., C. Harvey, F. McDermott, et L. Davidson. 2002. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36 (6):717–32. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Given, L. M. 2008. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Golafshani, N. janvier 2015. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonçalves Júnior, J., J. P. de Sales, M. Moreira Moreno, et M. L. Rolim-Neto. 2021. The impacts of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on suicide: A lexical analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.593918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griva, K., L. Zhi Hui, A. Yuanhong Lai, M. C. Choong, et W. Y. F. Marjorie. 2013. Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality–the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings! Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis 33 (3):280–89. doi:10.3747/pdi.2011.00308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamman, P., V. Anquetin, et C. Monicolle. 2017. Contemporary meanings of the ‘sustainable city’: A comparative review of the French- and English-Language Literature. Sustainable Development 25 (4):336–55. doi:10.1002/sd.1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K. 2011. Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in cochrane systematic reviews of interventions, Version. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/564342.
   Google Scholar
• Hochdorn, A., V. P. Faleiros, P. Valerio, et R. Vitelli. 2018. Narratives of transgender people detained in prison: The role played by the utterances “not” (as a feeling of hetero- and auto-rejection) and “exist” (as a feeling of hetero- and auto-acceptance) for the construction of a discursive self. A suggestion of goals and strategies for psychological counseling. Frontiers in Psychology 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society of Nephrology. 2012. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of Chronic kidney disease Kidney International 3 (1): 3–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justin, P., G. Dorard, C. Vioulac, A. Leu, et A. Untas. 2021. What do French school staff know about Young Carers? A qualitative study about their perceptions. Psychology in the Schools 58 (8):1531–44. doi:10.1002/pits.22510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, O., et L. Licata. 2003. When group representations serve social change: The speeches of Patrice Lumumba during the Congolese decolonization. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 (4):571–93. doi:10.1348/014466603322595284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamore, K., L. Montalescot, et A. Untas. 2017. Treatment decision-making in chronic diseases: What are the family members’ roles, needs and attitudes? A systematic review. Patient Education & Counseling 100 (12):2172–81. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamore, K., C. Vioulac, L. Fasse, C. Flahault, B. Quintard, et Aurélie Untas. 2020. Couples’ experience of the decision-making process in breast reconstruction after breast cancer: A lexical analysis of their discourse. Cancer Nursing 43 (5):384–95. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune, C. 2010. Montrer, calculer, explorer, analyser. Ce que l’informatique fait (faire) à l’analyse qualitative, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Lelorain, S., P. Tessier, A. Florin, et E. A. Bonnaud-Antignac. 2012. Posttraumatic growth in long term breast cancer survivors: Relation to coping, social support and cognitive processing. Journal of Health Psychology 17 (5):627–39. doi:10.1177/1359105311427475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madill, A., A. Jordan, et C. Shirley. 2000. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology 91 (1):1–20. doi:10.1348/000712600161646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., et C. Pope. 1995. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal 311 (6997):109–12. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
   Google Scholar
• Montalescot, L., G. Dorard, E. Speyer, K. Legrand, C. Ayav, C. Combe, B. Stengel, et A. Untas. 2023. The experience of relatives and friends of patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease: Insights from the CKD-REIN cohort study. British Journal of Health Psychology 28 (4):930–51. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasawa, H., I. Sugita, T. Tachi, H. Esaki, A. Yoshida, Y. Kanematsu, Y. Noguchi, Y. Kobayashi, E. Ichikawa, T. Tsuchiya, et al. The relationship between dialysis patients’ quality of life and caregivers’ quality of life. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9 2018 10.3389/fphar.2018.00770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., et Helene Joffe. 2020. Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (janvier):1609406919899220. doi:10.1177/1609406919899220.
   Google Scholar
• Ogutmen, B., A. Yildirim, M. S. Sever, S. Bozfakioglu, R. Ataman, E. Erek, O. Cetin, et A. Emel. 2006. Health-related quality of life after Kidney Transplantation in comparison intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and normal controls. Transplantation Proceedings 38 (2):419–21. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratinaud, P., and P. Marchand. 2012. Application de la méthode ALCESTE aux « gros » corpus et stabilité des « mondes lexicaux » : analyse du « CableGate » avec IRAMUTEQ. In, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, M. 1990. Alceste une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 26 (1):24–54. doi:10.1177/075910639002600103.
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, M. 1993. Les “mondes lexicaux” et leur “logique” à travers l’analyse statistique d’un corpus de récits de cauchemars. Langage & Société 66 (1):5–39. doi:10.3406/lsoc.1993.2632.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Sosa, H., M. Larrañaga Egilegor, T. Dos Santos, L. Perez-Marin, et Francisco Alvarez-Montero. 2020. Press ideology as an epistemological connector between framing theory and social representations theory: An analysis of violence and drug trafficking in the Mexican press. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 54 (1):179–95. doi:10.1007/s12124-019-09498-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robieux, L., L. Karsenti, M. Pocard, et C. Flahault. 2018. Let’s talk about empathy! Patient Education & Counseling 101 (1):59–66. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schielke, H. J., J. Louis Fishman, K. Osatuke, et W. B. Stiles. 2009. Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: The ward method. Psychotherapy Research 19 (4‑5):558–65. doi:10.1080/10503300802621180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonhardt‐Bailey, C., E. Yager, et S. Lahlou. 2012. Yes, Ronald Reagan’s Rhetoric Was Unique—But Statistically, How Unique? Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (3):482–513. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03990.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sezer, M. T., I. Eren, R. Ozcankaya, I. Civi, J. Erturk, et Mustafa Ozturk. 2003. Psychological symptoms are greater in caregivers of patients on hemodialysis than those of peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis International 7 (4):332–37. doi:10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.00058.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, J. A., et M. Osborn. 2003. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, ed. J. A. Smith, 53–81. doi:10.1002/9781119975144.ch9.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, M. A. R. D., M. L. Wall, A. C. D. M. C. Thuler, I. M. V. Lowen, A. M. Peres, et I. Margareth Voth Lowen, et A. M. Peres. 2018. The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP 52. doi:10.1590/s1980-220x2017015003353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengel, B., C. Combe, C. Jacquelinet, S. Briançon, D. Fouque, M. Laville, L. Frimat, C. Pascal, Y.-E. Herpe, J.-F. Deleuze, et al. 2014. The French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 29(8):1500–07. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengel, B., M. Metzger, C. Combe, C. Jacquelinet, S. Briançon, C. Ayav, D. Fouque, M. Laville, L. Frimat, C. Pascal, et al. 2019. Risk profile, quality of life and care of patients with moderate and advanced CKD: The French CKD-REIN cohort study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 34(2):277–86. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., P. Sainsbury, et Jonathan Craig. 2007. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19 (6):349–57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vioulac, C., C. Aubree, Z. A. Massy, et Aurélie Untas. 2016. Empathy and stress in nurses working in haemodialysis: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72 (5):1075–85. doi:10.1111/jan.12899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, G. 2013. Opening up to big data: Computer-assisted analysis of textual data in social sciences. Historical Social Research 38 (4):332–58. doi:10.12759/HSR.38.2013.4.332-358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar