The uses of victimhood as a hegemonic meta-narrative in eastern Europe

References

• Agarin, T. 2020. “The (Not So) Surprising Longevity of Identity Politics: Contemporary Challenges of the State-Society Compact in Central Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (2): 147–166. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1714598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaly, M. T., and A. M. Enders. 2021. “Why Me?” the Role of Perceived Victimhood in American Politics. Political Behavior January. 10.1007/s11109-020-09662-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann, J. 2011. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, A. 2021. “A Spectre Is Haunting Germany: The Mbembe Debate and the New Antisemitism.” Journal of Genocide Research 23 (3): 400–411. doi:10.1080/14623528.2020.1847861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C., and J. Obradović-Wochnik. 2016. “Mapping the Nexus of Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 281–301. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1199483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, G. Marks, J. Polk, J. Rovný, M. Steenbergen, and M. Anna Vachudova. 2019. “2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey“. Accessed 20 February 2022. https://www.chesdata.eu/2019-chapel-hill-expert-survey.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, G. Marks, J. Polk, J. Rovný, M. Steenbergen, and M. Anna Vachudova. 2020. “2019 Chapel Hill Candidate Survey.“ Accessec 20 February 2022. https://www.chesdata.eu/2019candidate.
   Google Scholar
• Barton Hronešová, Jessie. 2020. “The Struggle for Redress: Victim Capital in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Memory Politics and Transitional Justice . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, V. 2021. “How Historians Got Involved in Memory Politics: Patterns of the Historiography of the Polish People’s Republic before and after 1989.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 36 (3): 970–991. September.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. S. A. 2003. “Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity.” The British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 63–81. doi:10.1080/0007131032000045905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M. H., and J. Kubik. 2014. “Introduction.“ In Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration, edited byBernhard, M.H., Kubik, J, 1–6. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bešlin, M., H. Dajč, P. Ehin, S. Hanley, N. Jovanović, M. Radulović, N. Styczyńska, and L. Talving. 2020. ‘Political Populism from the Fringe to the Mainstream: A Conceptual Framework (WP4)’. POPREBEL: Populist Rebellion against Modernity in 21st-century Eastern Europe: Neo-traditionalism and neo-feudalism 4. https://populism-europe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Working-Paper-4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bibó, I. 1997. Bída Malých Národů Východní Evropy: Vybrané Spisy [The Misery of Small Nations: Selected Works]. Praha: Doplněk.
   Google Scholar
• Bilali, R. 2012. “Identity Centrality and In-Group Superiority Differentially Predict Reactions to Historical Victimization and Harm Doing.” Human Security 6: 17.
   Google Scholar
• Blaive, M. 2021. “The Reform Communist Interpretation of the Stalinist Period in Czech Historiography and Its Legacy.” In East European Politics and Societies 36 (3): 957–969.
   Google Scholar
• Bouris, E. 2007. Complex Political Victims. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S., P. Joenniemi, and B. J. Steele. 2021. Vicarious Identity in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchtík, M., P. Eichler, O. Kopečný, K. Smejkalová, and J. Uhrova. 2021. ‘Jedna společnost, různé světy: Poznatky kvalitativní studie o fragmentarizaci české společnosti [One society, different worlds: Findings from a qualitative study on the fragmentization of Czech society]’.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., and J. Manning. 2018 2018. The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars, 1st. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. 2021. “Victimhood: The Affective Politics of Vulnerability.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 24 (1): 10–27. doi:10.1177/1367549420979316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A. M. 2006. The Cult of True Victimhood: From the War on Welfare to the War on Terror. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, L. 2020. The past Can’t Heal Us: The Dangers of Mandating Memory in the Name of Human Rights. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djureinović, J. 2020. The Politics of Memory of the Second World War in Contemporary Serbia. Collaboration, Resistance and Retribution. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dragović-Soso, J. 2002. Saviours of the Nation: Serbia’s Intellectual Opposition and the Revival of Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragović-Soso, J. 2022. “Justice and Apology in the Aftermath of War and Mass Crime: Contemporary Serbia and the German Model.” History & Memory 34 (1): 69–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. 2020. “Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Anxiety over Kosovo’s Secession.” In Central and Eastern European Perspectives on International Relations. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G., and D. Ziblatt. 2013. “Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe One Hundred Years On.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 27 (1): 90–107. doi:10.1177/0888325412465310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2020. “Right-Wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, S. 2017. “Curated Stories: The Uses and Misuses of Storytelling.” In Oxford Studies in Culture & Politics . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, eds. 2017. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R., B. Raven, and D. Cartwright. 1959. “The Bases of Social Power.” Classics of Organization Theory 7: 311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Gest, J. 2016. The New Minority: White Working Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsee, K. 2014. “A Tale of “Two Totalitarianisms”: The Crisis of Capitalism and the Historical Memory of Communism.” History of the Present 4 (2): 115–142. doi:10.5406/historypresent.4.2.0115.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsee, K., and M. Orenstein. 2021. Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions. Oxford & New York,: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A. 2016. “Communism Equals or versus Nazism? Europe’s Unwholesome Legacy in Strasbourg.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (1): 74–96. doi:10.1177/0888325415570966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubovic, J. 2021. “Beyond Agency as Good: Complicity and Displacement after the Siege of Sarajevo.” Journal of Refugee Studies. doi:10.1093/jrs/feab096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordy, E. 2013. Guilt, Responsibility, and Denial: The past at Stake in Post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. 2015. Victims and Victimhood. Petersborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J. 2016. “The Holocaust and Poland’s “History Policy”.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 10 (3): 481–486. doi:10.1080/23739770.2016.1262991.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2007. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. 2014. “Memory Politics and Ontological Security in Sino-Japanese Relations.” Asian Studies Review 38 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1080/10357823.2013.852156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, B. 2019. “Holocaust History and Jewish Heritage Preservation: Scholars and Stewards Working in PiS-Ruled Poland.” Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies 37 (1): 96–107. doi:10.5703/shofar.37.1.0096.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2007. “Sources of Euroscepticism.” Acta Politica 42 (2): 119–127. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, R. B. 2018. “Politics as Victimhood, Victimhood as Politics.” Journal of Policy History 30 (3): 552–574. doi:10.1017/S0898030618000209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibreck, R. 2012. “A Time of Mourning: Commemorating the Tutsi Genocide in Rwanda.” In Public Memory, Public Media and the Politics of Justice, edited by P. Lee and P. N. Thomas, 98–120, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Index. 2015. ‘Lázár: A Bevándorlás Újabb Trianonhoz Vezethet’. Accessed 28 December 2015. http://index.hu/belfold/2015/12/28/lazar_a_bevandorlas_ujabb_trianonhoz_vezethet/.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, T. A. 2015. “A Theory of Victimhood: Politics, Conflict and the Construction of Victim-Based Identity.” Millennium 43 (2): 511–530. doi:10.1177/0305829814550258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowitz, S. 2018. Order of Victimhood: Violence, Hierarchy and Building Peace in Northern Ireland. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jelin, E. 2003. State Repression and the Labors of Memory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Judt, T. 2005. Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kapralski, S. 2017 Jews and the Holocaust in Poland’s Memoryscapes: An Inquiry into Transcultural Amnesia. In The Twentieth Century in European Memory:edited byT. S. Andersen and B. TörnquistTörnquistPlewa Transcultural Mediation and Reception Leiden/Boston: Brill:170–197
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 1969. “Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics.” International Organization 23 (2): 291–310. doi:10.1017/S002081830003160X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kończal, K., and A.D. Moses. 2021. “‘Patriotic Histories in Global Perspective’.” Journal of Genocide Research 24: 2. September. 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeček, M. 2008. “In Search of “National Memory” the Politics of History, Nostalgia and the Historiography of Communism in the Czech Republic and East Central Europe.” In Past in the Making: Historical Revisionism in Central Europe after 1989, edited by M. Kopeček, 75–95, Budapest: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koposov, N. 2021. “Populism and Memory: Legislation of the past in Poland, Ukraine, and Russia.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 36 (1): 272–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krekó, P., and Z. Enyedi. 2018. “Orbán’s Laboratory of Illiberalism.” Journal of Democracy 29 (3): 39–51. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruizinga, S. 2022. “Introduction.” In The Politics of Smallness in Modern Europe Size, Identity and International Relations since 1800, edited by S. Kruizinga, 1–14. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Krystalli, R. C. 2021. “Narrating Victimhood: Dilemmas and (In) Dignities.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 23 (1): 125–146. doi:10.1080/14616742.2020.1861961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucia, D.-D., and Magierowski. 2013. “The Collective Memory of Auschwitz and World War II among Catholics in Poland: A Qualitative Study of Three Communities.” History & Memory 25 (2): 132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagrou, P. 1997. “Victims of Genocide and National Memory: Belgium, France and the Netherlands 1945-1965.” Past & Present 154 (154): 181–222. doi:10.1093/past/154.1.181.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. B. 2020. “The Uses and Abuses of Victimhood Nationalism in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (1): 62–87. doi:10.1177/1354066119850249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., and N. Sznaider. 2002. “Memory Unbound: The Holocaust and the Formation of Cosmopolitan Memory.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (1): 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J.-H. 2010. “Victimhood Nationalism in Contested Memories: National Mourning and Global Accountability”. In Memory in a Global Age: Discourses, Practices and Trajectories, edited by, A. Assmann and S. Conrad. 138–162. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J.-H. 2021. “Triple Victimhood: On the Mnemonic Confluence of the Holocaust, Stalinist Crime, and Colonial Genocide.” Journal of Genocide Research 23 (1): 105–126. doi:10.1080/14623528.2020.1750822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, A. 2013. “Explaining Policy Conflict across Institutional Venues: European Union-Level Struggles over the Memory of the Holocaust: Explaining Policy Conflict across Institutional Venues.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 489–504. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02317.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinova, O. 2021. “Politics of Memory and Nationalism.” Nationalities Papers 49 (6): 997–1007. doi:10.1017/nps.2020.87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2014. “Criminalizing Communism: Transnational Mnemopolitics in Europe.” International Political Sociology 8 (1): 82–99. doi:10.1111/ips.12041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2015. ““Memory Must Be Defended”: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security.” Security Dialogue 46 (3): 221–237. doi:10.1177/0967010614552549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2022. “The Postcolonial Moment in Russia’s War against Ukraine.” Journal of Genocide Research 1–11. doi:10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. 2020. Neither Settler nor Native: The Making and Unmaking of Permanent Minorities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370. doi:10.1177/1354066106067346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, R. G. 1996. “War Stories: The Search for a Usable past in the Federal Republic of Germany.” The American Historical Review 101 (4): 1008–1048. doi:10.2307/2169632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, B. 2016. “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective Memory.” Memory Studies 9 (2): 125–142. doi:10.1177/1750698015596014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, A. D. 2021. The Problems of Genocide: Permanent Security and the Language of Transgression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myshlovska, O. 2019. “Delegitimizing the Communist past and Building a New Sense of Community: The Politics of Transitional Justice and Memory in Ukraine.” International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity 7 (1): 372–405. doi:10.18352/hcm.561.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, L. 2015. “Integrating the Central European past into a Common Narrative: The Mobilizations around the ‘Crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 344–363. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, L. 2020. ‘Debating Communism at the European Institutions’. Magazine of the European Observatory on Memories, November 2020. https://europeanmemories.net/magazine/debating-communism-at-the-european-institutions/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C. A. 2022. “‘“whoever Says that Serbia Is Small Is Lying!” Serbia, Ontological (In)security and the Unbearable Smallness of Being’.” In The Politics of Smallness in Modern Europe Size, Identity and International Relations since 1800, edited by S. Kruizinga, 1–14. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Olick, J. K. 1998. “Introduction: Memory and the Nation—Continuities, Conflicts, and Transformations.” Social Science History 22 (4): 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, J. J. 2001. The Victim as Hero: Ideologies of Peace and National Identity in Postwar Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, E. 2018. “Performing the Nation: The Janus-Faced Populist Foundations of Illiberalism in Hungary.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26 (3): 308–321. doi:10.1080/14782804.2018.1498776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patricia, E., and S. S. Silbey. 1995. “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative.” Law & Society Review 29 (2): 197. doi:10.2307/3054010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., and K. R. Monroe. 1998. “Narrative in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 315–331. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehe, V. 2021. “Czech Prime Minister Implicated as Communist Secret Police Agent – Yet Nobody Cares.” Cultures of History Forum 9. doi:10.25626/0129.
   Google Scholar
• Persaud, R. B. 2022. “Ideology, Socialization and Hegemony in Disciplinary International Relations.” International Affairs 98 (1): 105–123. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsinis, V. 2020. “Converging or Diverging Patterns of Euroscepticism among Political Parties in Croatia and Serbia.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 28 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1080/14782804.2019.1686345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew. 2016. Religion and Social Life in Central and Eastern Europe Data Set Survey Conducted June 2015-July 2016. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pietraszewski, I., and B. Törnquist-Plewa. 2022. “Cosmopolitan Memories under Pressure: The Case of Wrocław.” History & Memory 34 (2): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radonić, L. 2021. Der Zweite Weltkrieg in postsozialistischen Gedenkmuseen. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rashkova, E. R. 2021. “The Future of Europe and the Role of Eastern Europe in Its Past, Present and Future.” European Political Science 20 (2): 237–242. doi:10.1057/s41304-020-00264-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H. 2008. “The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 8 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00159.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2009. Multidirectional Memory and the Universalization of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2022. ‘On the Possibilities and Pitfalls of German Holocaust Memory Today’. AICGS (blog). Accessed 27 January 2022. https://www.aicgs.org/2022/01/on-the-possibilities-and-pitfalls-of-german-holocaust-memory-today/.
   Google Scholar
• Rozett, R. 2022 April. “‘Competitive Victimhood and Holocaust Distortion’”. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs. 1–17. 10.1080/23739770.2022.2059740
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, H. 2016. “Victims and Victimhood: Individuals of Inaction or Active Agents of Change? Reflections on Fieldwork in Afghanistan.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10 (1): 168–178. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijv032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šafr, P. 2020. ‘Kauza Pullmann: Od revize dějepisu k revizi demokracie’, 2020. https://www.forum24.cz/kauza-pullmann-od-revize-dejepisu-k-revizi-demokracie/.
   Google Scholar
• Sierp, A. 2017. “1939 versus 1989—A Missed Opportunity to Create a European Lieu de Mémoire ?” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 31 (3): 439–455. doi:10.1177/0888325417697791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniegon, T. 2014. Vanished History: The Holocaust in Czech and Slovak Historical Culture. Vol. 18. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. 2009. “The Historical Reality of Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 23 (1): 7–12. doi:10.1177/0888325408328750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stakić, I. 2022. ‘Žrtve NATO Bombardovanja: Između Laži I Patetike [Victim of the NATO Bombardment: Between Lies and Pathos]’. Peščanik (blog). Accessed 24 March 2022. https://pescanik.net/zrtve-nato-bombardovanja-izmedju-lazi-i-patetike/.
   Google Scholar
• Stan, L. 2008. Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J., and A. J. Innes. 2013. “Memory, Trauma and Ontological Security.” In Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, Cases and Debates, edited by E. Resende and D. Budryte, 15–29. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2012. “Memory Wars in the “New Europe”.” In The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, edited by D. Stone, 714–732. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Styczyńska, N. 2017. “Eurosceptic Parties in the Central and Eastern European Countries: A Comparative Case Study of Poland, Hungary and Bulgaria.” In The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism, 139–154. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. 2016. “Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (4): 610–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. 2019. Yellow Star, Red Star. Holocaust Remembrance after Communism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szeky, J. 2014. ‘A Tradition of Nationalism: The Case of Hungary’, Accessed 11 April 2014. https://www.eurozine.com/a-tradition-of-nationalism/.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2018. “Putting Brexit into Perspective: The Effect of the Eurozone and Migration Crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European States.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (8): 1194–1214. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnquist-Plewa, B. 2021. “Populist Memory Discourses in Contemporary East Central and South Eastern Europe – Their Roots and Main Features.” Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 06 (61): 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, P. 2018. History, Empathy and Conflict: Heroes, Victims and Victimisers. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. 2008. “Historiographic Revision and Revisionism. The Evidential Difference.” In Past in the Making: Historical Revisionism in Central Europe after 1989, edited by M. Kopecek, 1–16. Budapest: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, M., and D. Slater. 2021. “Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Democracy: Historical Lessons from South and Southeast Asia.” Perspectives on Politics 19 (3): 706–722. doi:10.1017/S153759272000078X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. 2020. Introduction, In The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood, edied by J. R. Vollhardt. 1–34. Oxford University Press: Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Waardt, D., Weber, S. Mijke, and S. Weber. 2019. “Beyond Victims’ Mere Presence: An Empirical Analysis of Victim Participation in Transitional Justice in Colombia.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 11 (1): 209–228. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huz002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wike, R., J. Poushter, L. Silver, and S. Cornibert. “European Public Opinion Three Decades after the Fall of Communism.“ 2019. Accessed 20 March 2022 https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/15/european-public-opinion-three-decades-after-the-fall-of-communism/.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2010. “Ontological (In)security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan.” International Relations 24 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/0047117809359040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar