Powering large industrial facilities – using wind- or nuclear power?

References

• Abou-Jaoude, A., L. Lin, C. Bolisetti, E. Worsham, L. M. Larsen, and A. Epiney. 2023. Literature Review of Advanced Reactor Cost Estimates. Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Nuclear Science & Technology Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Barnert, H., V. Krett, and J. Kupitz. 1991. “Nuclear Energy for Heat Applications: Co-generating Electricity and Heat is a Promising Application.” IAEA Bulletin 33 (1): 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bhutta, K. S., and F. Huq. 2002. “Supplier Selection Process: A Comparison of the Total Cost of Ownership and the Analytic Hierarchy Process Approaches.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 7 (3): 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210436586.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg-Sitton, S. M., R. Boardman, C. Rabiti, and J. O’Brien. 2020. “Reimagining Future Energy Systems: Overview of the US Program to Maximize Energy Utilization via Integrated Nuclear-Renewable Energy Systems.” International Journal of Energy, Research 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W. L., and H. Li. 2001. “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Approach to Determine Measures for Business Performance.” Measuring Business Excellence 5 (3): 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005864.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, W. M., M. J. Venetos, and S. Hume. 2022. “Liquid Salt Combined Cycle.” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022, Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition GT2022, June 13–17, 2022. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): GT2022-82343.
   Google Scholar
• Csik, B. J., and J. Kupitz. 1997. “Nuclear Power Applications: Supplying Heat for Homes and Industries.” IAEA Bulletin 39 (2): 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• DECC. 2013. The Future of Heating: Meeting the Challenge. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).
   Google Scholar
• Devold, H., T. Nestli, and J. Hurter. 2006. All Electric LNG Plants: Better, Safer, More Reliable - and Profitable. Oslo: ABB Process Automation Oil and Gas.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P. K. 2001. “Decision Support System for Risk Management: A Case Study.” Management Decision 39 (8): 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110399558
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2003. Life-Cycle Costing: Using Activity-based Costing and Monte Carlo Methods to Manage Future Costs and Risks. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2020. “On the Levelized Cost of Energy of Windfarms.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 39 (7): 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1753742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2024. Understanding the Levelized Cost of Energy.Handbook of Power Systems, edited by M. Freunek and O. Doleski. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J., and A. Ôsterlund. 2023. “How the Energy Trilemma Can Provide Learning Points Between Countries – the Case for Nuclear.” Internation Journal for Nuclear Power 68 (2): 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J., and L. Tonning. 2003. “Decision Support in Selecting Maintenance Organization.” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 9 (1): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510310466765.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, N. 2023. “Data Insight: The Cost of a Wind Turbine Has Increased by 38% in Two Years.Energy Monitor.” https://www.energymonitor.ai/renewables/data-insight-the-cost-of-a-wind-turbine-has-increased-by-38-in-two-years/.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. 2022. “New Onshore Wind Project Costs Increased 7 Percent from 2021 to 2022.” North American Windpower. https://nawindpower.com/new-onshore-wind-project-costs-increase-7-percent-from-2021-to-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Goetzke, R., I. Garza, M. Nena, R. Field, S. Malak, and A. Wilson. 2022. The Viability of Nuclear Plant Process Heat for Industrial Usage. Chicago, IL: Sargent & Lundy.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. P. 1996. “Nuclear Energy Into the Twenty-First Century.” Applied Energy 54 (4): 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(96)00003-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, T. 2010. What Are Externalities? What Happens When Prices Do Not Fully Capture Costs. Finance & Development. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF). 47: 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Huke, A., G. Ruprecht, D. Weißbach, S. Gottlieb, A. H. Hussein, and K. Czerski. 2015. “The Dual Fluid Reactor – A Novel Concept for a Fast Nuclear Reactor of High Efficiency.” Annals of Nuclear Energy 80: 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2017. Industrial Applications of Nuclear Energy. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Department of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power Technology Development Section (NPTDS).
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2017. Opportunities for Cogeneration with Nuclear Energy. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA) / Organization for Economic Co-operation and Develop (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2012. Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), IRENA Innovation and Technology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Knighton, L. T., A. Shigrekar, D. S. Wendt, R. D. Boardman, B. Murphy, and B. D. James. 2020. Markets and Economics for Thermal Power Extraction from Nuclear Power Plants Aiding the Decarbonization of Industrial Processes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Krey, V., O. Masera, G. Blanford, T. Bruckner, R. Cooke, K. Fisher-Vanden, H. Haberl, et al. 2014. “Annex II: Metrics & Methodology.Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change.” In Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by O. Edenhofer and R. Pichs-Madruga, 1281–1328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G. 2018. Measuring Human Capital for Norway 2007–2014. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå (SSB) - Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. R., and J. R. McBride. 2020. “Chasing Cheap Nuclear: Economic Trade-offs for Small Modular Reactors.” The Bridge 50 (3): 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. R., A. Yip, and T. Nordhaus. 2016. “Historical Construction Costs of Global Nuclear Power Reactors.” Energy Policy 91 (April): 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011
   Google Scholar
• NVE. 2020. Elektrifiseringstiltak i Norge: Hva er konsekvensene for kraftsystemet? NVE Rapport nr. 36/2020. Oslo, Noregs Vassdrags og Energidirektorat (NVE). English; Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• NVE. 2023. Tilknytning og elektrifisering av Hammerfest LNG: Bakgrunn for innstilling. Oslo, Noregs Vassdrags og Energidirektorat (NVE). English; Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Partanen, R. 2017. “Decarbonizing Cities: Helsinki Metropolitan Area: Providing District Heating, Power and Transportation Fuels with Advanced Nuclear Reactors.” Helsinki, Energy for Humanity.
   Google Scholar
• Peakman, A., and B. Merk. 2019. “The Role of Nuclear Power in Meeting Current and Future Industrial Process Heat Demands.” Energies 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peniwati, K. 2000. The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Its Basics and Advancements. Jakarta: INSAHP 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A. 2021. “Nuclear Energy: Non-Electric Applications.” European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 5 (1), https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/29305.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, G. 2016. “Defining Plant-level Costs.” In The Full Costs of Electricity Provision.Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop. Paris: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Division of Nuclear Development.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2020. Nuclear Cogeneration: Civil Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Future. Policy Briefing. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1990. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning. Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., and E. Forsman. 1992. The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies. Arlington, VA: Expert Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1979. “Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk.” In Proceedings of the General Motors Symposium on Societal Risk Assessment, edited by R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers, 181–216. Warren, MI: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smil, V. 2020. “Energiewende, 20 Years Later.” IEEE Spectrum 57 (12): 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2020.9271803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. 2008. “Some Economics of Global Warming.” Rivista di Politica Economica 98 (6): 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ueckerdt, F., L. Hirth, G. Luderer, and O. Edenhofer. 2013. “System LCOE: What Are the Costs of Variable Renewables?” Energy 63: 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US DOE. 2015. Quadrennial Technology Review: An Assessment of Energy Technologies and Research Opportunities. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Verdolini, E., F. Vona, and D. Popp. 2018. “Bridging the Gap: Do Fast-Reacting Fossil Technologies Facilitate Renewable Energy Diffusion?” Energy Policy 116: 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WNISR. 2020. “Barakah, UAE: Grid Connection of First Commercial Reactor in the Arab World.”
   Google Scholar