Gridlock in compromise, or is multi-objective optimisation possible in renewable energy planning? A stakeholder analysis using scenario-MCDA

References

• 1000 minds. 2023a. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA/MCDM).” January 30, 2023. https://www.1000minds.com/decision-making/what-is-mcdm-mcda#indirect-methods.
   Google Scholar
• 1000 minds. 2023b. “PAPRIKA Method.” January 30, 2023. https://www.1000minds.com/paprika.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Taha, Rimal, and Tugrul Daim. 2013. “Multi-Criteria Applications in Renewable Energy Analysis, a Literature Review.” In Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry, edited by Tugrul Daim, Terry Oliver, and Jisun Kim, 17–30. Green Energy and Technology. London: Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Adem Esmail, Blal, and Davide Geneletti. 2018. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Nature Conservation: A Review of 20 Years of Applications.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution / British Ecological Society 9 (1): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriatico, Jessa M., Angela Cruz, Ryan C. Tiong, and Clarissa R. Racho-Sabugo. 2022. “An Analysis on the Impact of Choice Overload to Consumer Decision Paralysis.” JEFAS 4 (1): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2022.4.1.4.
   Google Scholar
• Agardy, Tundi, Giuseppe N. Di Sciara, and Patrick Christie. 2011. “Mind the Gap: Addressing the Shortcomings of Marine Protected Areas Through Large Scale Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 35 (2): 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanito, Fabrizio, Sam Roberts, Anita Shepherd, and Astley Hastings. 2022. “Quantifying the Land-Based Opportunity Carbon Costs of Onshore Wind Farms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 363: 132480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliyu, Mustapha. 2015. “A Review of Spatial Multi Criteria Analysis (SMCA) Methods for Sustainable Land Use Planning (SLUP).” Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) 2 (9): 2581–2590. https://www.jmest.org/wp-content/uploads/JMESTN42351081.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amaducci, Stefano, Xinyou Yin, and Michele Colauzzi. 2018. “Agrivoltaic Systems to Optimise Land Use for Electric Energy Production.” Applied Energy 220: 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammermann, Kathrin, and Dirk Bernotat. 2022. “Planerische und naturschutzfachliche Ansätze zur Lösung umweltinterner Zielkonflikte.” In Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e. V. Berlin (GfU) 2022. February 30, 2023. https://www.gesellschaft-fuer-umweltrecht.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GfU_2022_Thesenpapiere.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arbter, Kerstin. 2012. Praxisbuch Partizipation: Gemeinsam die Stadt entwickeln. Werkstattberichte / Stadtentwicklung 127. Wien: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Magistratsabt. 18 - Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung. https://permalink.obvsg.at/AC10689577.
   Google Scholar
• Awan, Ahmed B., Mohammed Alghassab, Muhammad Zubair, Abdul R. Bhatti, Muhammad Uzair, and Ghulam Abbas. 2020. “Comparative Analysis of Ground-Mounted vs. Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems Optimized for Interrow Distance Between Parallel Arrays.” Energies 13 (14): 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron-Gafford, Greg A., Mitchell A. Pavao-Zuckerman, Rebecca L. Minor, Leland F. Sutter, Isaiah Barnett-Moreno, Daniel T. Blackett, Moses Thompson, et al. 2019. “Agrivoltaics Provide Mutual Benefits Across the Food–Energy–Water Nexus in Drylands.” Nat Sustain 2 (9): 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0364-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaly, Heather. 2018. “Closed-mindedness and Dogmatism.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 15 (3): 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.22.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudrie, Christian, Charles J. Corbett, Thomas A. Lewandowski, Timothy Malloy, and Xiaoying Zhou. 2021. “Evaluating the Application of Decision Analysis Methods in Simulated Alternatives Assessment Case Studies: Potential Benefits and Challenges of Using MCDA.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 17 (1): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Sören, Timothy Moss, and Matthias Naumann. 2016. “The Importance of Space: Towards a Socio-Material and Political Geography of Energy Transitions.” In Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition, edited by Ludger Gailing, and Timothy Moss, 93–108. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Benzaghta, Mostafa A., Abdulaziz Elwalda, Mousa Mousa, Ismail Erkan, and Mushfiqur Rahman. 2021. “SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative Literature Review.” JGBI 6 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148.
   Google Scholar
• Beylot, Antoine, Jérôme Payet, Clément Puech, Nadine Adra, Philippe Jacquin, Isabelle Blanc, and Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre. 2014. “Environmental Impacts of Large-Scale Grid-Connected Ground-Mounted PV Installations.” Renewable Energy 61: 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, Ankit, Madhura Joshi, Radhika Khosla, and Navroz K. Dubash. 2019. “More Priorities, More Problems? Decision-Making with Multiple Energy, Development and Climate Objectives.” Energy Research & Social Science 49: 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, J., J. Köppel, and M. Grimm. 2021. “Creating Space for Wind Energy in a Polycentric Governance Setting.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 152: 111672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, Juliane, Leonard Missbach, Franziska Riedel, Ruben Stemmle, Julian Jüchter, Jessica Weber, Johanna Kucknat, et al. 2022. “Wicked facets of the German energy transition – examples from the electricity, heating, transport, and industry sectors.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 42 (1): 1128–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2244602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, Thomas, Markus Biberacher, Sabine Gadocha, and Ingrid Schardinger. 2013. “‘Energy Landscapes’: Meeting Energy Demands and Human Aspirations.” Biomass and Bioenergy 55: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloise, Jennifer, Georg Wenzelburger, and Markus B. Siewert. 2022. “To Protect or not Protect? Comparing Nature Conservation Policies in the German Federal States.” Regional & Federal Studies, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2022.2061468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blotevogel, H. U., R. Danielzyk, and A. Münter. 2014. “Spatial Planning in Germany: Institutional Inertia and New Challenges.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, 1st ed., edited by Mario Reimer, Panagiōtēs Getimēs, and Hans H. Blotevogel, 83–108. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, Stephan, and Matthias Schmidt. 2020. “Wonderland of Technology? How Energy Landscapes Reveal Inequalities and Injustices of the German Energiewende.” Energy Research & Social Science 70: 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbois, Marie Claire. 2019. “Powershifts: A Framework for Assessing the Growing Impact of Decentralized Ownership of Energy Transitions on Political Decision-Making.” Energy Research & Social Science 50: 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Britannica Dictionary. 2023a. “Advocate definition.” March 30, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/advocate.
   Google Scholar
• The Britannica Dictionary. 2023b. “Dissent definition.” March 30, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/dissenter.
   Google Scholar
• The Britannica Dictionary. 2023c. “Dogmatic definition.” March 30, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/dogmatic.
   Google Scholar
• The Britannica Dictionary. 2023d. “Realist Definition.” March 30, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/realist.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, Samuel D. 2003. “Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (4): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03022004007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucker, Klaas de, Cathy Macharis, and Alain Verbeke. 2013. “Multi-criteria Analysis and the Resolution of Sustainable Development Dilemmas: A Stakeholder Management Approach.” European Journal of Operational Research 224 (1): 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmayr, Astrid, Luc van Ootegem, Jo Dewulf, and Elsy Verhofstadt. 2021. “Understanding Attitudes Towards Renewable Energy Technologies and the Effect of Local Experiences.” Energies 14 (22): 7596. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz. 2023a. March 05, 2023. “Landschaftsschutzgebiete in Deutschland.” https://www.bfn.de/daten-und-fakten/landschaftsschutzgebiete-deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz. 2023b. March 30, 2023. “Naturparke in Deutschland und Europa.” https://www.bfn.de/daten-und-fakten/naturparke-deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Naturschutz und Verbraucherschutz. 2023. March 03, 2023. “Nationale Artenhilfsprogramme.” https://www.bmuv.de/themen/naturschutz-artenvielfalt/artenschutz/nationaler-artenschutz/artenhilfsprogramme.
   Google Scholar
• Bunzel, Katja, Jana Bovet, Daniela Thrän, and Marcus Eichhorn. 2019. “Hidden Outlaws in the Forest? A Legal and Spatial Analysis of Onshore Wind Energy in Germany.” Energy Research & Social Science 55: 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnero, María C. 2020. “Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method.” Mathematics 8 (8): 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8081375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnoye, Leslie, and Rita Lopes. 2015. “Participatory Environmental Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of Four Case Studies.” Sustainability 7 (8): 9823–9845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7089823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaouachi, Aymen, Catalin F. Covrig, and Mircea Ardelean. 2017. “Multi-criteria Selection of Offshore Wind Farms: Case Study for the Baltic States.” Energy Policy 103: 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli, Marco, Stuart R. Coles, and Kerry Kirwan. 2014. “Analysis of the Potentials of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Methods to Conduct Sustainability Assessment.” Ecological Indicators 46: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinque, Serena, Annelie Sjölander-Lindqvist, and Camilla Sandström. 2022. “Frontline Bureaucrats in Wildlife Management: Caught in the Dilemma Between Effectiveness and Responsiveness.” Environmental Policy Governance 32 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, Richard. 2010. “Wind Power, Landscape and Strategic, Spatial Planning—The Construction of ‘Acceptable Locations’ in Wales.” Land Use Policy 27 (2): 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, Richard, and Carla de Laurentis. 2021. “Understanding the Effects of Spatial Planning on the Deployment of on-Shore Wind Power: Insights from Italy and the UK.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1987866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuemath. 2023. “Transitive Relations.” January 30, 2023. https://www.cuemath.com/algebra/transitive-relations/.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, Mats, Love Ekenberg, and Nadejda Komendantova. 2018. “A Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Energy Transition Policy Formation in Jordan.” In Group Decision and Negotiation in an Uncertain World. Vol. 315, edited by Ye Chen, Gregory Kersten, Rudolf Vetschera, and Haiyan Xu, 190–202. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Ian M., Robert Watret, and Matt Gubbins. 2014. “Spatial Planning for Sustainable Marine Renewable Energy Developments in Scotland.” Ocean & Coastal Management 99: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, Benjamin, and Laurie Hoffman-Goetz. 2015. “Emotional Tone of Ontario Newspaper Articles on the Health Effects of Industrial Wind Turbines Before and After Policy Change.” Journal of Health Communication 20 (5): 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.999894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshaies, Michel, and Daniel Herrero-Luque. 2015. “Wind Energy and Natural Parks in European Countries (Spain, France and Germany).” In Renewable Energies and European Landscapes, edited by Marina Frolova, María-José Prados, and Alain Nadaï, 217–233. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2009. “Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-Protective Action.” J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol 19 (6): 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2013. “Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line.” Environment and Behavior 45 (6): 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512440435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doljak, Dejan, Gorica Stanojević, and Dragana Miljanović. 2021. “A GIS-MCDA Based Assessment for Siting Wind Farms and Estimation of the Technical Generation Potential for Wind Power in Serbia.” International Journal of Green Energy 18 (4): 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1865363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dütschke, Elisabeth, Uta Schneider, and Julius Wesche. 2017. “Knowledge, Use and Effectiveness of Social Acceptance Measures for Wind Projects.” Z Energiewirtsch 41 (4): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-017-0211-1.
   Google Scholar
• Efremov, Cristina, Mihai Sanduleac, and Dumitru Braga. 2022. “Challenges and Opportunities of Agri-PV Systems in a Clean Energy Transition for Rural Areas.” 2022 International conference and exposition on electrical and power engineering (EPE), edited by IEEE, 556–61: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, Marcus, Philip Tafarte, and Daniela Thrän. 2017. “Towards Energy Landscapes – “Pathfinder for Sustainable Wind Power Locations”.” Energy 134: 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einig, Klaus. 2022. “Regionalplanung für einen raumverträglichen Ausbau von Freiflächen-Photovoltaikanlagen (FPV): Positionspapier aus der ARL.” ARL (143). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251224/1/1796028541.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Enevoldsen, Peter. 2016. “Onshore Wind Energy in Northern European Forests: Reviewing the Risks.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60: 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbguth, Wilfried. 2019. “Zur Steuerungskraft der Raumordnungsplanung. Am Beispiel Akzeptanzrelevanter Konflikte der Windenergieplanung.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung Spatial Research and Planning 77 (2): 219–220. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Fachagentur Windenergie an Land. 2017. “Frühzeitige Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung im Kontext der Windenergie: Von der Theorie in die Praxis.” February 30, 2023. https://www.fachagentur-windenergie.de/fileadmin/files/Veroeffentlichungen/FA_Wind_fruehzeitige_Oeffentlichkeitsbeteiligung_Theorie_Praxis_2017-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, Tadeu M., and José Q. Pinheiro. 2020. “This Energy Is Clean, but Here, on the Dunes, It Would Be Dirty": Renewable Sources of Energy and Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Galinhos-RN, Brazil.” Community Psychology in Global Perspective 6 (2): 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1285/I24212113V6I2-2P110.
   Google Scholar
• Felber, Georg, and Gernot Stoeglehner. 2014. “Onshore Wind Energy Use in Spatial Planning—a Proposal for Resolving Conflicts with a Dynamic Safety Distance Approach.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 4 (22): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-014-0022-8.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, Jeremy. 2019. “Wind Energy: A Human Challenge.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 366 (6470): 1206. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, Uwe. 2009. “Qualitative Methoden in der Evaluationsforschung.” Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung 10 (1): 9–18. https://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/einrichtungen/arbeitsbereiche/qualitative_sozial-_bildungsforschung/Medien/ssoar-zqf-2009-1-flick-Qualitative_Methoden_in_der_Evaluationsforschung.pdf. Accessed January 08, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Rebecca, Ondrej Sumavsk, Auren Clarke, and Paul Thorsnes. 2014. “Personalized Energy Priorities: A User-Centric Application for Energy Advice.” In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services. Vol. 8519, edited by Aaron Marcus, 542–53. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Rebecca, Sara Walton, Janet Stephenson, David Rees, Michelle Scott, Geoff King, John Williams, and Ben Wooliscroft. 2017. “Emerging Energy Transitions: PV Uptake Beyond Subsidies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 117: 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, Christina, Paul Hansen, Bjarnhéðinn Guðlaugsson, David M. Ingram, and R. C. Thomson. 2022. “Weighting Key Performance Indicators of Smart Local Energy Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Energies 15 (24): 9305. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geißler, Gesa. 2013. “Strategic Environmental Assessments for Renewable Energy Development — Comparing the United States and Germany.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 15 (02): 1340003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333213400036.
   Google Scholar
• Geissler, Susanne, Abraham Arevalo-Arizaga, David Radlbauer, and Peter Wallisch. 2022. “Linking the National Energy and Climate Plan with Municipal Spatial Planning and Supporting Sustainable Investment in Renewable Energy Sources in Austria.” Energies 15 (2): 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giove, Silvio, Adriana Brancia, F. K. Satterstrom, and Igor Linkov. 2009. “Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA.” In Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, edited by Antonio Marcomini, Glenn W. Suter II, and Andrea Critto, 1–21. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffrida, Nadia. 2020. “A Public Participatory GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Framework for the Evaluation of Transport Scenarios.” Bollettino delle Sedute Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali, Catania 53 (383): MISC6-MISC7. https://doi.org/10.35352/gioenia.v53i383.92.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, Ainhoa, and Álvaro Enríquez-de-Salamanca. 2018. “Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis in Environmental Assessment: A Review and Reflection on Benefits and Limitations.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 20 (03): 1840001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321840001X.
   Google Scholar
• Göttert, Thomas, and Nicole Starik. 2022. “Human–Wildlife Conflicts Across Landscapes—General Applicability vs. Case Specificity.” Diversity 14 (5): 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050380.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, Pamela, and Sue McIntyre. 2014. “Using Ecological Attributes as Criteria for the Selection of Plant Species Under Three Restoration Scenarios.” Austral Ecology 39 (8): 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribat, Nina, Justin Kadi, Jan Lange, Yuca Meubrink, and Jonas Müller. 2017. “Planung als politische Praxis. Zur Einleitung in den Themenschwerpunkt.” Sub\Urban 5 (1/2): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.36900/suburban.v5i1/2.268.
   Google Scholar
• Grip, Kjell, and Sven Blomqvist. 2021. “Marine Spatial Planning: Coordinating Divergent Marine Interests.” Ambio 50 (6): 1172–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01471-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajto, Małgorzata, Zdzisław Cichocki, Małgorzata Bidłasik, Jan Borzyszkowski, and Agnieszka Kuśmierz. 2017. “Constraints on Development of Wind Energy in Poland Due to Environmental Objectives. Is There Space in Poland for Wind Farm Siting?” Environmental Management 59 (2): 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0788-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Paul, and Franz Ombler. 2008. “A New Method for Scoring Additive Multi-Attribute Value Models Using Pairwise Rankings of Alternatives.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 15 (3-4): 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.428.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, Frank, Roel May, Jiska van Dijk, and Jan K. Rød. 2018. “Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool Suite for Consensus-Based Siting of Renewable Energy Structures.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 20 (03): 1840003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333218400033.
   Google Scholar
• Hazboun, Shawn O., and Hilary S. Boudet. 2020. “Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest.” Energies 13 (8): 1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldeweg, Michiel. 2017. “Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrischke, Oliver. 2022. “Bewältigung naturschutzrechtlicher Konflikte beim Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien: Thesen.”In Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e. V. Berlin (GfU) 2022. February 30, 2023. https://www.gesellschaft-fuer-umweltrecht.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GfU_2022_Thesenpapiere.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Höfer, Tim, Ruediger von Nitzsch, and Reinhard Madlener. 2019. “Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives.” SSRN Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501616.
   Google Scholar
• Hojnik, Jana, Mitja Ruzzier, Stephanie Fabri, and Alenka L. Klopčič. 2021. “What You Give Is What You Get: Willingness to Pay for Green Energy.” Renewable Energy 174: 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, Cameron, Amanda Kennedy, Tariro Mutongwizo, and Clifford D. Shearing. 2019. “Governing Energy Transitions: Unconventional Gas, Renewables and Their Environmental Nexus.” SSRN Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3467890.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Ivy B., Jeffrey Keisler, and Igor Linkov. 2011. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends.” The Science of the Total Environment 409 (19): 3578–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Frank, Sören Köcher, Johannes Vogel, and Frederik Meyer. 2012. “Dazing Diversity: Investigating the Determinants and Consequences of Decision Paralysis.” Psychology & Marketing 29 (6): 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübscher, Marcus. 2022. “Planning Behind Closed Doors: Unlocking Large-Scale Urban Development Projects Using the Stakeholder Approach on Tenerife, Spain.” Land 11 (3): 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hyunseo, Youngju Kim, and Catherine U. Huh. 2014. “Seeing Is Believing: Effects of Uncivil Online Debate on Political Polarization and Expectations of Deliberation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58 (4): 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islar, Mine, and Henner Busch. 2016. ““We Are Not in This to Save the Polar Bears!” – the Link Between Community Renewable Energy Development and Ecological Citizenship.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29 (3): 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1188684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacklin-Jarvis, Carol, and Karen Potter. 2017. “Collaborative public leadership: does problem context matter?”. In: 2nd International Public & Political Leadership (PUPOL) Conference - Leadership for Public and Social Value, 06-07 Apr 2017, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubczyk, Michał, Maciej Niewada, Robert Plisko, Magdalena Władysiuk, Michał Jachimowicz, Cezary Pruszko, Katarzyna Wepsięć, and Joanna Lis. 2022. “What Matters in Treating Non-Oncological Rare Diseases?—Eliciting Experts’ Preferences in Poland with PAPRIKA.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 29 (1-2): 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup, Brad. 2010. “Plural and Hybrid Environmental Values: A Discourse Analysis of the Wind Energy Conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom.” Environmental Politics 19 (1): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903396069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesuit, David K., and Russell A. Williams. 2017. Public Policy, Governance and Polarization: Making Governance Work. Routledge Critical Studies in Public Management. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315560342.
   Google Scholar
• Jiricka-Pürrer, Alexandra, Martin Bösch, and Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider. 2018. “Desired but Neglected: Investigating the Consideration of Alternatives in Austrian EIA and SEA Practice.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10103680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Michelle L., Kathleen P. Bell, and Mario F. Teisl. 2016. “Does Reading Scenarios of Future Land Use Changes Affect Willingness to Participate in Land Use Planning?” Land Use Policy 57: 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakislak, Irmak, and Nina Schneider. 2023. “The Mayor Said So? The Impact of Local Political Figures and Social Norms on Local Responses to Wind Energy Projects.” Energy Policy 176: 113509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keseru, Imre, Thierry Coosemans, and Cathy Macharis. 2021. “Stakeholders’ Preferences for the Future of Transport in Europe: Participatory Evaluation of Scenarios Combining Scenario Planning and the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis.” Futures 127: 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, Julia K., David Rudolph, Sophie Nyborg, and Tom Cronin. 2022. “The Landrush of Wind Energy, its Socio-Material Workings, and Its Political Consequences: On the Entanglement of Land and Wind Assemblages in Denmark.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 239965442211436. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221143657.
   Google Scholar
• Klöti, Tanja. 2016. “Zum Verhältnis von partizipativer Stadtentwicklung, neoliberaler Stadtpolitik und stadtteilbezogener Sozialer Arbeit.” In Soziale Arbeit in der unternehmerischen Stadt: Kontexte, Programmatiken, Ausblicke, edited by Patrick Oehler, Nicola Thomas, and Matthias Drilling, 53–73. Quartiersforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kment, Martin. 2022. “Beschleunigung des Ausbaus von Windenergieanlagen an Land.” In Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e. V. Berlin (GfU) 2022. February 30, 2023. https://www.gesellschaft-fuer-umweltrecht.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GfU_2022_Thesenpapiere.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Knauf, Jakob. 2022. “Can't buy me Acceptance? Financial Benefits for Wind Energy Projects in Germany.” Energy Policy 165: 112924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komendantova, Nadejda, and Sonata Neumueller. 2020. “Discourses About Energy Transition in Austrian Climate and Energy Model Regions: Turning Awareness Into Action.” Energy & Environment 31 (8): 1473–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X20907086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompetenzzentrum Naturschutz und Energiewende. 2021. “Fachgespräch Dichtezentren: Fachliche und methodische Konzepte der Bundesländer.” February 30, 2023. https://www.naturschutz-energiewende.de/wp-content/uploads/KNE-Dokumentation_Fachgespraech-Dichtezentren-fachlich_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, Udo. 2012. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, Udo. 2019. “Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach.” In Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, edited by Gabriele Kaiser, and Norma Presmeg, 181–197. Springer eBook Collection. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kühne, Olaf, Debi Parush, Deborah Shmueli, and Corinna Jenal. 2022. “Conflicted Energy Transition—Conception of a Theoretical Framework for Its Investigation.” Land 11 (1): 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Mahesh. 2020. “Social, Economic, and Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Resources.” In Wind Solar Hybrid Renewable Energy System, edited by Kenneth Eloghene Okedu, Ahmed Tahour, and Abdel Ghani Aissaou. IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, Marcus B. 2003. “Participation, Decentralization, and Civil Society.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (4): 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03022004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, Jannis, Michiel Zaaijer, Jaco Quist, and Kornelis Blok. 2023. “Introducing Site Selection Flexibility to Technical and Economic Onshore Wind Potential Assessments: New Method with Application to Indonesia.” Renewable Energy 202: 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Stefan, Lars Emmelin, and Sandra Vindelstam. 2014. “Multi-Level Environmental Governance: The Case of Wind Power Development in Sweden.” Societal Studies 6 (2): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-14-6-2-04.
   Google Scholar
• Latinopoulos, D., and K. Kechagia. 2015. “A GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Wind Farm Site Selection. A Regional Scale Application in Greece.” Renewable Energy 78: 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Paul, Kathrin Ammermann, Erik Gawel, Charlotte Geiger, Jennifer Hauck, Jörg Heilmann, Jan-Niklas Meier, et al. 2021. “Managing Spatial Sustainability Trade-Offs: The Case of Wind Power.” Ecological Economics 185: 107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, Mick, and Mark Scott. 2017. “Opportunity or Threat: Dissecting Tensions in a Post-Carbon Rural Transition.” Sociologia Ruralis 57 (1): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerche, Nils, Ines Wilkens, Meike Schmehl, Swantje Eigner-Thiel, and Jutta Geldermann. 2019. “Using Methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Provide Decision Support Concerning Local Bioenergy Projects.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 68: 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPS.2017.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvall, Daniel. 2023. “Why Municipalities Reject Wind Power: A Study on Municipal Acceptance and Rejection of Wind Power Instalments in Sweden.” Energy Policy 180: 113664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, Igor. 2023. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Case Studies in Engineering and the Environment. Second Edition. Environmental Assessment and Management. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lode, Maria L., Geert te Boveldt, Cathy Macharis, and Thierry Coosemans. 2021. “Application of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis for Transition Management in Energy Communities.” Sustainability 13 (4): 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchi, Elena. 2023. “Renewable Energies and Architectural Heritage: Advanced Solutions and Future Perspectives.” Buildings 13 (3): 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lück, Andrea, and Ilka Nyga. 2018. “Experiences of Stakeholder Participation in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Processes for Water Infrastructure.” Urban Water Journal 15 (6): 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1364394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, Cathy, Laurence Turcksin, and Kenneth Lebeau. 2012. “Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) as a Tool to Support Sustainable Decisions: State of Use.” Decision Support Systems 54 (1): 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlooji, Maral, Firra G. Gumilar, and Kaveh Madani. 2020. “Dealing with Trade-Offs in Sustainable Energy Planning: Insight for Indonesia.” In Food-Energy-Water Nexus Resilience and Sustainable Development: Decision-Making Methods, Planning, and Trade-Off Analysis, edited by Somayeh Asadi, and Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo, 243–266. Cham: Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, Jacek, and Piotr Jankowski. 2020. “Emerging Trends and Research Frontiers in Spatial Multicriteria Analysis.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34 (7): 1257–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1712403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, Sarah. 2008. “The Role of Discourse Coalitions in Planning for Renewable Energy: A Case Study of Wind-Energy Deployment.” Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 26 (3): 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0503j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolan Kandy, Deepa, Vincent Wretling, Berit Balfors, and Ulla Mörtberg. 2022. “Linking Multi-criteria Approaches to Spatial Planning for Wind Energy Development in Two Case Studies in Sweden.” CWW2022, April 5. https://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1650979&dswid=8824.
   Google Scholar
• Maqbool, Rashid, Xiaomei Deng, and Yahya Rashid. 2020. “Stakeholders’ Satisfaction as a Key Determinant of Critical Success Factors in Renewable Energy Projects.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 10 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00259-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl-Hummel, Lioba, and Jutta Geldermann. 2014. “A Local-Level, Multiple Criteria Decision Aid for Climate Protection.” EURO Journal on Decision Processes 2 (1-2): 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0011-8.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, Mika, Jyri Mustajoki, Mikko Dufva, and Timo P. Karjalainen. 2015. “How to Design and Realize Participation of Stakeholders in MCDA Processes? A Framework for Selecting an Appropriate Approach.” EURO Journal on Decision Processes 3 (1-2): 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Sean L., Victor Cazalis, Nigel Dudley, Michael Hoffmann, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Sue Stolton, Piero Visconti, et al. 2020. “Area-Based Conservation in the Twenty-First Century.” Nature 586 (7828): 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Zita, and Alexandra M. Freund. 2022. “Better Off Without? Benefits and Costs of Resolving Goal Conflict Through Goal Shelving and Goal Disengagement.” Motivation and Emotion 46 (6): 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09966-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 12., überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag. http://d-nb.info/1063369835/04.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2016. Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. 6., überarbeitete Auflage. Pädagogik. Weinheim: Beltz. http://www.beltz.de/de/nc/verlagsgruppe-beltz/gesamtprogramm.html?isbn = 978-3-407-25734-5.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, R., I. Mulalic, I. Soutar, J. M. Weinand, J. Price, S. Petrović, and K. Mainzer. 2022. “Exploring Trade-Offs Between Landscape Impact, Land use and Resource Quality for Onshore Variable Renewable Energy: An Application to Great Britain.” Energy 250: 123754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörtberg, Ulla, Deepa Manolan Kandy, Vincent Wretling, and Berit Balfors. 2019. “Wind Power Planning with a Multicriteria Approach - Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the REWIND-GIS Tool: Conference paper, Oral presentation only.” Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts (CWW) 2019, 2019. http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1388828&dswid=7270.
   Google Scholar
• Mostegl, Nina M., Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider, and Wolfgang Haider. 2017. “Spatial Energy Planning in Germany: Between High Ambitions and Communal Hesitations.” Landscape and Urban Planning 167: 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2017.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefanie, Norman Backhaus, and Matthias Buchecker. 2020. “Mapping Meaningful Places: A Tool for Participatory Siting of Wind Turbines in Switzerland?” Energy Research & Social Science 69: 101573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefanie, Johannes Flacke, and Matthias Buchecker. 2022. “Participatory Mapping and Counter-Representations in Wind Energy Planning.” Case Studies in the Environment 6 (1), https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2022.1561651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Katja, and Tom Morton. 2021. “The Space, the Time, and the Money. Wind Energy Politics in East Germany.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40: 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundaca, Luis, Henner Busch, and Sophie Schwer. 2018. “‘Successful’ Low-Carbon Energy Transitions at the Community Level? An Energy Justice Perspective.” Applied Energy 218: 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olde, Evelien M. de, Henrik Moller, Fleur Marchand, Richard W. McDowell, Catriona J. MacLeod, Marion Sautier, Stephan Halloy, et al. 2017. “When Experts Disagree: The Need to Rethink Indicator Selection for Assessing Sustainability of Agriculture.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 19 (4): 1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9803-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein, Daniel E., David Troupin, Ella Segal, Jennifer M. Holzer, and Gili Hakima-Koniak. 2019. “Integrating Ecological Objectives in University Campus Strategic and Spatial Planning: A Case Study.” IJSHE 20 (2): 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2017-0219.
   Google Scholar
• Pandeya, Ganesh P., and Shree K. Shrestha. 2016. “Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal.” Journal of South Asian Development 11 (3): 276–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174116667097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascali, Paolo de, and Annamaria Bagaini. 2019. “Energy Transition and Urban Planning for Local Development. A Critical Review of the Evolution of Integrated Spatial and Energy Planning.” Energies 12 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlowsky, Carrie, Jennifer Koch, and Travis Gliedt. 2023. “Place Attachment and Social Barriers to Large-Scale Renewable Energy Development: A Social–Ecological Systems Analysis of a Failed Wind Energy Project in the South-Central United States.” Socio-Ecological Practice Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00142-0.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Jonathan, Karin Bäckstrand, and David Schlosberg. 2020. “Between Environmental and Ecological Democracy: Theory and Practice at the Democracy-Environment Nexus.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt, André E. 2017. “Strategic Management Decision-Making in a Complex World: Quantifying, Understanding, and Using Trade-Offs.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 (2): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada, Stanislav, Oliver Schweiger, Alexander Harpke, Elisabeth Kühn, Tomáš Kuras, Josef Settele, and Martin Musche. 2019. “Protected Areas do not Mitigate Biodiversity Declines: A Case Study on Butterflies.” Diversity and Distributions 25 (2): 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, C., G. Montibeller, and A. Morton. 2011. “Extending the use of Scenario Planning and MCDA for the Evaluation of Strategic Options.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (5): 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reers, Hendrik, Hartmann Stefanie, Johanna Hurst, and Robert Brinkmann. 2017. “Bat Activity at Nacelle Height Over Forest.” In Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions: Presentations from the CWW2015 Conference, edited by Johann Köppel, 79. US: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Havelland-Fläming. 2020. “Planungskonzept zur Festlegung von Eignungsgebieten für die Windenergienutzung im Regionalplan Havelland-Fläming 3.0 Entwurf.” February 30, 2023. https://havelland-flaeming.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Planungskonzept_Windenergienutzung_August2020-04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rehhausen, Anke, Johann Köppel, Frank Scholles, Boris Stemmer, Ralf-Uwe Syrbe, Ina Magel, Gesa Geißler, and Wolfgang Wende. 2018. “Quality of Federal Level Strategic Environmental Assessment – A Case Study Analysis for Transport, Transmission Grid and Maritime Spatial Planning in Germany.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 73: 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, Mario, and Hans H. Blotevogel. 2012. “Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization.” Planning Practice and Research 27 (1): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659517.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Mario, Panagiōtēs Getimēs, and Hans H. Blotevogel, eds. 2014. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=Cr7MAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA83&dq=spatial+planning+germany&ots=wS56L64DJO&sig=whkunvPqkZldnRbUoMmuA2xUmVs#v=onepage&q=spatial%20planning%20germany&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Reitz, Sybille, Lauren Goshen, and Dörte Ohlhorst. 2022. “Trade-offs in German Wind Energy Expansion: Building Bridges Between Different Interests, Values and Priorities.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 12 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00365-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutter, Felix, Charlotte Geiger, Paul Lehmann, Jan-Niklas Meier, and Philip Tafarte. 2022. “Flächenziele für die Windenergie: Wie zielführend ist das neue Wind-an-Land-Gesetz?” Wirtschaftsdienst (hamburg, Germany 102 (9): 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3269-2.
   Google Scholar
• Roskamm, N. 2015. “Planungstheorie aktuell. Von rational bis agonistisch - eine Positionsbestimmung.” Planerin: Mitgliederzeitschrift für Stadt-, Regional- Und Landesplanung 6: 9–11. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/151809.
   Google Scholar
• Rossini, Patrícia. 2022. “Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk.” Communication Research 49 (3): 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, Willem. 2021. “Public Norms in Practices of Transitional Planning—The Case of Energy Transition in The Netherlands.” Sustainability 13 (8): 4454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Iris K., Frenk van Harreveld, Mark Rotteveel, Sascha Topolinski, Joop van der Pligt, Norbert Schwarz, and Sander L. Koole. 2015. “The Path of Ambivalence: Tracing the Pull of Opposing Evaluations Using Mouse Trajectories.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, Eva, Lea Bulling, and Johann Köppel. 2015. “Consolidating the State of Knowledge: A Synoptical Review of Wind Energy's Wildlife Effects.” Environmental Management 56 (2): 300–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0501-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Mark, and Eoin O'Neill. 2013. “Displacing Wind Power Across National Boundaries or eco-Innovation? Spatial Planning Implications of UK-Ireland Renewable Energy Trading.” Planning Theory & Practice 14 (3): 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.821837.
   Google Scholar
• Seht, Hauke von. 2021. “Ausreichend Raum für die Windenergienutzung an Land. Ein Vorschlag für neue regulative Rahmenbedingungen.” RuR 79 (6): 606–619. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.128.
   Google Scholar
• Siksnelyte, Indre, Edmundas Zavadskas, Dalia Streimikiene, and Deepak Sharma. 2018. “An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues.” Energies 11 (10): 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjölander-Lindqvist, Annelie. 2015. “Balancing Differentiated Interests and Conceptualizations in Environmental Management.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 4 (3): 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-07-2014-0022.
   Google Scholar
• Sjölander-Lindqvist, Annelie, and Camilla Sandström. 2019. “Shaking Hands: Balancing Tensions in the Swedish Forested Landscape.” Conservat Society 17 (4): 319. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skea, Jim, Renée van Diemen, Joana Portugal-Pereira, and Alaa A. Khourdajie. 2021. “Outlooks, Explorations and Normative Scenarios: Approaches to Global Energy Futures Compared.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168: 120736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaev, Aleksandar D., Atanas Kovachev, Boriana Nozharova, Diliana Daskalova, Peter Nikolov, and Plamen Petrov. 2019. “Overcoming the Failures of Citizen Participation: The Relevance of the Liberal Approach in Planning.” Planning Theory 18 (4): 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, Leonhard, Elisa Amodeo, Alessandro Luè, Simona Muratori, Anna Scolobig, and Anthony Patt. 2018. “Stakeholder Engagement and Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding in the Electricity Transmission Grid Reinforcement: Evidence from a Role-Playing Game.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (13): 2378–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spijkerboer, R. C., C. Zuidema, T. Busscher, and J. Arts. 2021. “Unravelling Institutional Work Patterns: Planning Offshore Wind Farms in Contested Space.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40: 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridonidou, Sofia, Georgia Sismani, Eva Loukogeorgaki, Dimitra G. Vagiona, Hagit Ulanovsky, and Daniel Madar. 2021. “Sustainable Spatial Energy Planning of Large-Scale Wind and PV Farms in Israel: A Collaborative and Participatory Planning Approach.” Energies 14 (3): 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T., S. French, J. Rios, Theodor J. Stewart, Simon French, and Jesus Rios. 2013. “Integrating Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Scenario Planning – Review and Extension.” Omega 41 (4): 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, and Swedish Energy Agency. 2021. “Nationell strategi för en hållbar vindkraft: Rapport framtagen i samarbete med Naturvårdsverket.” February 30, 2023. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/amnesomraden/vindkraft/nationell-strategi-for-en-hallbar-vindkraftsutbyggnad/.
   Google Scholar
• Tafarte, Philip, Charlotte Geiger, and Paul Lehmann. 2022. “Quantifying the opportunity cost of land use restrictions and their impact on the energy transition - a case study for Germany’s onshore wind power.” February 30, 2023. University Leipzig,Department for Economics. doi:10.1109/EEM54602.2022.9921167.
   Google Scholar
• Tafarte, Philip, and Paul Lehmann. 2020. “Sustainability Trade-Offs in the Spatial Allocation of Future Onshore Wind Generation Capacity - an Empiric Case Study for Germany.” EGU General Assembly, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9651.
   Google Scholar
• Tafarte, Philip, and Paul Lehmann. 2021. “Quantifying Trade-Offs for the Spatial Allocation of Onshore Wind Generation Capacity: a Case Study for Germany.” UFZ Discussion Paper 2/2021. February 30, 2023. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/234329.
   Google Scholar
• te Boveldt, Geert, Imre Keseru, and Cathy Macharis. 2021. “How Can Multi-Criteria Analysis Support Deliberative Spatial Planning? A Critical Review of Methods and Participatory Frameworks.” Evaluation 27 (4): 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211020334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietz, Hans-Peter. 2012. “Der Beitrag der Raumplanung zur Energiewende: Chancen und Probleme.” March 30, 2023. https://www.arl-net.de/system/files/tietz.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tourki, Yousra, Jeffrey Keisler, and Igor Linkov. 2013. “Scenario Analysis: A Review of Methods and Applications for Engineering and Environmental Systems.” Environment Systems and Decisions 33 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9437-6.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, Jeroen, Andreas Hartmann, Aad van der Horst, and Geert Dewulf. 2020. “Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Quality of Design Decisions in Infrastructure Tenders: A Contractor’s Perspective.” Construction Management and Economics 38 (2): 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1577559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf, G. R., D. C. Morton, R. S. DeFries, J. G. Olivier, P. S. Kasibhatla, R. B. Jackson, G. J. Collatz, and J. T. Randerson. 2009. “CO2 Emissions from Forest Loss.” Nature Geoscience 2 (11): 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Harreveld, Frenk, Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Mark Rotteveel, Loran F. Nordgren, and Joop van der Pligt. 2009. “Ambivalence and Decisional Conflict as a Cause of Psychological Discomfort: Feeling Tense Before Jumping off the Fence.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (1): 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. 2023. “MAXQDA: The #1 Software for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Data Analysis.” January 30, 2023. https://www.maxqda.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Wäger, Patrick. 2007. “Multi Criteria Evaluation: Working Paper for the COST 365 Meeting.” October 10, 2007. Accessed October 30, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlster, Philip, Mireille Goetghebeur, Christine Kriza, Charlotte Niederländer, and Peter Kolominsky-Rabas. 2015. “Balancing Costs and Benefits at Different Stages of Medical Innovation: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).” BMC Health Services Research 15: 262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J., J. Biehl, and J. Köppel. 2019. “Lost in Bias? Multifaceted Discourses Framing the Communication of Wind and Wildlife Research Results: The PROGRESS Case.” In Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts, edited by Regina Bispo, Joana Bernardino, Helena Coelho, and José Lino Costa, 179–204. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Jessica, and Johann Köppel. 2022. “Can MCDA Serve Ex-Post to Indicate ‘Winners and Losers’ in Sustainability Dilemmas? A Case Study of Marine Spatial Planning in Germany.” Energies 15 (20): 7654. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Jessica, Tim Steinkamp, and Marc Reichenbach. 2023. “Competing for Space? A Multi-Criteria Scenario Framework Intended to Model the Energy–Biodiversity–Land Nexus for Regional Renewable Energy Planning Based on a German Case Study.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 13 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00402-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiehe, Julia, Julia Thiele, Anna Walter, Ali Hashemifarzad, Jens Hingst, and Christina Haaren. 2021. “Nothing to Regret: Reconciling Renewable Energies with Human Wellbeing and Nature in the German Energy Transition.” International Journal of Energy Research 45 (1): 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiehe, Julia, Christina von Haaren, and Anna Walter. 2020. “How to Achieve the Climate Targets? Spatial Planning in the Context of the German Energy Transition.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 10 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-0244-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiertz, Thilo, Lilith Kuhn, and Annika Mattissek. 2023. “A Turn to Geopolitics: Shifts in the German Energy Transition Discourse in Light of Russia's war Against Ukraine.” Energy Research & Social Science 98: 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Julia. 2022. “Rechtsschutzverkürzung als Mittel der Verfahrensbeschleunigung? Die Umsetzung der Energiewende im Spannungsfeld von Klimawandel und Umwelt(rechts)schutz.” In Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e. V. Berlin (GfU) 2022. February 30, 2023. https://www.gesellschaft-fuer-umweltrecht.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GfU_2022_Thesenpapiere.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yatsalo, Boris, Sergey Gritsyuk, Terry Sullivan, Benjamin Trump, and Igor Linkov. 2016. “Multi-criteria Risk Management with the Use of DecernsMCDA: Methods and Case Studies.” Environment Systems and Decisions 36 (3): 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9598-1.
   Google Scholar
• Zaunbrecher, Barbara S., Katrin Arning, and Martina Ziefle. 2018. “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Affect and Its Role for Renewable Energy Acceptance.” In SMARTGREENS 2018: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems: Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, March 16-18, 2018, edited by Cornel Klein, Brian Donnellan, and Markus Helfert, 325–336. Setúbal, Portugal: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications Lda.
   Google Scholar