Proteomics in the study of female fertility: an update

References

• Aslam B, Basit M, Nisar MA, et al. Proteomics: technologies and their applications. J Chromatogr Sci. 2017;55(2):182–196. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bmw167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Broi MG, Giorgi VSI, Wang F, et al. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(5):735–751. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1143-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkhalifa M, Madkour A, Louanjli N, et al. From global proteome profiling to single targeted molecules of follicular fluid and oocyte: contribution to embryo development and IVF outcome. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(4):407–423. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2015.1056782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pla I, Sanchez A, Pors SE, et al. Proteome of fluid from human ovarian small antral follicles reveals insights in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(3):756–770. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Fei X, Zhang H, et al. Proteomic analysis of the alterations in follicular fluid proteins during oocyte maturation in humans. Front Endocrinol. 2022;12(February):1–10. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.830691
   Google Scholar
• la C PL, Pla I, Sanchez A, et al. Progressive changes in human follicular fluid composition over the course of ovulation: quantitative proteomic analyses. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;495:110522. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamah AM, Hassis ME, Albertolle ME, et al. Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid from fertile women. Clin Proteomics. 2015;12(1). doi: 10.1186/s12014-015-9077-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakerkish F, Brännström M, Carlsohn E, et al. Proteomic analysis of follicular fluid during human ovulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):917–924. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S-M, Kim J-S. A review of mechanisms of implantation. Dev Reprod. 2017;21(4):351–359. doi: 10.12717/DR.2017.21.4.351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messinis IE, Messini CI, Dafopoulos K. Novel aspects of the endocrinology of the menstrual cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(6):714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant TM. 60 YEARS of NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: the hypothalamo-pituitary–gonadal axis. J Endocrinol. 2016;226(2):T41–T54. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paule SG, Heng S, Samarajeewa N, et al. Podocalyxin is a key negative regulator of human endometrial epithelial receptivity for embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(5):1353–1366. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura-Benítez M, Carbajo-García MC, Corachán A, et al. Proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles secreted by primary human epithelial endometrial cells reveals key proteins related to embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022;20(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00879-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissonnette L, Drissennek L, Antoine Y, et al. Human S100A10 plays a crucial role in the acquisition of the endometrial receptivity phenotype. Cell Adhes Migr. 2016;10(3):282–298. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1128623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J, Hutchison J, Salamonsen LA, et al. Proteomic insights into endometrial receptivity and embryo-endometrial epithelium interaction for implantation reveal critical determinants of fertility. Proteomics. 2020;20(1):1–13. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201900250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Debén S, Bellver J, Alamá P, et al. iTRAQ comparison of proteomic profiles of endometrial receptivity. J Proteomics. 2019;203(April):103381. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Q, Zhang A, Yu F, et al. Label-free proteomics uncovers energy metabolism and focal adhesion regulations responsive for endometrium receptivity. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(4):1831–1842. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutada S, Basak T, Savardekar L, et al. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein in human uterine fluid and its relevance in implantation. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(4):763–780. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasvandik S, Saarma M, Kaart T, et al. Uterine fluid proteins for minimally invasive assessment of endometrial receptivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(1):219–230. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azkargorta M, Bregón-Villahoz M, Escobes I, et al. In-depth proteomics and natural peptidomics analyses reveal antibacterial peptides in human endometrial fluid. J Proteomics. 2020;216(January):103652. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103652
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rai A, Poh QH, Fatmous M, et al. Dynamic regulation of key players of embryo implantation and fertility in human uterine extracellular vesicles during menstrual cycle Alin. J Neurophysiol. 2010;21(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kanaka V, Proikakis S, Drakakis P, et al. Implementing a preimplantation proteomic approach to advance assisted reproduction technologies in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2022;13(2):237–260. doi: 10.1007/s13167-022-00282-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeger KM, Dokras A, Piltonen T. Update on PCOS: consequences, challenges, and guiding treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(3):E1071–83. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler AE, Moin AS, Sathyapalan T, et al. Components of the complement cascade differ in polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12232. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil K, Yelamanchi S, Kumar M, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis to unravel glycoproteomic signature of follicular fluid in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues TS, Bonetti TCS, Pimenta DC, et al. Original article proteomic profile of follicular fluid from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) submitted to in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared to oocyte donors. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23(4):367–391. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Ding N, Xin W, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals that a prognostic signature of the endometrium of the polycystic ovary syndrome women based on ferroptosis proteins. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13(July):1–13. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.871945
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Xu X, Li P, et al. TMT based proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid from overweight/obese and normal-weight patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10(November):1–16. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amjadi F, Mehdizadeh M, Ashrafi M, et al. Distinct changes in the proteome profile of endometrial tissues in polycystic ovary syndrome compared with healthy fertile women. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(2):184–200. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.04.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho LML, Ferreira CN, De OD, et al. Haptoglobin levels, but not Hp1-Hp2 polymorphism, are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(12):1691–1698. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1030-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid N, Nigam A, Jain SK, et al. Proteomic sift through serum and endometrium profiles unraveled signature proteins associated with subdued fertility and dampened endometrial receptivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;380(3):593–614. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03171-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Jiang X, Li C, et al. Proteomic alteration of endometrial tissues during secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome may affect endometrial receptivity. Clin Proteomics. 2022;19(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12014-022-09353-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alikhani M, Amjadi F, Mirzaei M, et al. Proteome analysis of endometrial tissue from patients with PCOS reveals proteins predicted to impact the disease. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(11):8763–8774. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05924-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolla E. Endometriosis: advences and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. F1000Res. 2019;8:1–28. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480968/
   Google Scholar
• Manousopoulou A, Hamdan M, Fotopoulos M, et al. Integrated Eutopic Endometrium and Non-Depleted Serum Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Identifies Candidate Serological Markers of Endometriosis. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2019;13(3):e1800153. doi: 10.1002/prca.201800153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ph D, Kasvandik S, Sc M. Perceived stress and fatigue among students in a doctor of chiropractic training program. J Chiropr Educ. 2016;31(1):8–13. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen X, Liu H, Sun W, et al. Elevated urine histone 4 levels in women with ovarian endometriosis revealed by discovery and parallel reaction monitoring proteomics. J Proteomics. 2019;204(1):103398. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janša V, Klančič T, Pušić M, et al. Proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid identified COMP and TGFBI as new candidate biomarkers for endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00299-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande G, Vincenzoni F, Milardi D, et al. Cervical mucus proteome in endometriosis. Clin Proteomics. 2017;14(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9142-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ek M, Roth B, Engström G, et al. AXIN1 in plasma or serum is a potential new biomarker for endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(1):189. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorile PG, Baldi A. Serum biomarker for diagnosis of endometriosis. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229(11):1731–1735. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorile PG, Baldi A. Supporting evidences for potential biomarkers of endometriosis detected in peripheral blood. Data BR. 2015;5:971–974. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.10.047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Méar L, Com E, Fathallah K, et al. The eutopic endometrium proteome in endometriosis reveals candidate markers and molecular mechanisms of physiopathology. Diagnostics. 2022;12(2):419. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A LLW, A RJN, A RLR. The impact of obesity on oocytes: evidence for lipotoxicity mechanisms. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2012;24(1):29–34. doi: 10.1071/RD11904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metwally M, Preece R, Thomas J, et al. A proteomic analysis of the endometrium in obese and overweight women with recurrent miscarriage: preliminary evidence for an endometrial defect. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X, Wang Y, Zhu P, et al. Human follicular fluid proteome reveals association between overweight status and oocyte maturation abnormality. Clin Proteomics. 2020;17(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12014-020-09286-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald HC, Evans J, Johnson N, et al. Idiopathic infertility in women is associated with distinct changes in proliferative phase uterine fluid proteins †. Biol Reprod. 2018;98(6):752–764. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar M. Proteomic identification and analysis of human endometrial proteins associated with unexplained infertility. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014;7(11):359–366. doi: 10.4172/jpb.1000340
   Google Scholar
• Manohar M, Khan H, Sirohi VK, et al. Alteration in endometrial proteins during early- and mid-secretory phases of the cycle in women with unexplained infertility. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu T, Yan M, Shen W, et al. Predictive serum markers for unexplained infertility in child-bearing aged women. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020;83(1):0–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baig M, Azhar A, Rehman R, et al. Relationship of serum leptin and reproductive hormones in unexplained infertile and fertile females. Cureus. 2019;11(12). doi: 10.7759/cureus.6524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Liu X, Zhu P, et al. Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid associated with successful in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1). doi: 10.1186/s12958-017-0277-y
   Google Scholar
• Nishihara T, Matsumoto K, Hosoi Y, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant status and oxidative stress markers in follicular fluid for human in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(4):481–486. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowska AE, Macur K, Czaplewska P, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of proteome and peptidome of human follicular fluid using multiple samples from single donor with LC–MS and SWATH methodology. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(8):3053–3067. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Jin J, Zhang YL, et al. Decreased histidine-rich glycoprotein and increased complement C4-B protein levels in follicular fluid predict the IVF outcomes of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Clin Proteomics. 2022;19(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12014-022-09383-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Spiessens C, D’Hooghe T, et al. Follicular fluid biomarkers for human in vitro fertilization outcome: proof of principle. Proteome Sci. 2016;14(1). doi: 10.1186/s12953-016-0106-9
   Google Scholar
• Artini PG, Scarf G, Marzi I, et al. Oxidative stress-related signaling pathways predict oocytes’ fertilization in vitro and embryo quality. IJMS. 2022;23(21):13442. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113442
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez-Calonge R, Cortés S, Gutierrez Gonzalez LM, et al. Oxidative stress in follicular fluid of young women with low response compared with fertile oocyte donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(4):446–456. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy RA, van Montfoort APA, Groen H, et al. Anti-oxidative function of follicular fluid HDL and outcomes of modified natural cycle-IVF. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49091-3
   Google Scholar
• Machlin JH, Barishansky SJ, Kelsh J, et al. Fibroinflammatory signatures increase with age in the human ovary and follicular fluid. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4902. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luddi A, Gori M, Marrocco C, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human cumulus and granulosa cells as biomarkers for oocyte quality estimation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):930–939.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Hu L, Zhang C. Urinary vitamin D-binding protein as a marker of ovarian reserve. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;9(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00762-9
   Google Scholar
• Ciepiela P, Dulęba AJ, Kowaleczko E, et al. Vitamin D as a follicular marker of human oocyte quality and a serum marker of in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1265–1276. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1179-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas G. Cell-surface morphological events relevant to human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(SUPPL. 2):37–44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_2.37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Díaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martínez-Conejero JA, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):50–60.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Gómez T, Quiñonero A, Antúnez O, et al. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(9):1957–1967. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matorras R, Quevedo S, Corral B, et al. Proteomic pattern of implantative human endometrial fluid in in vitro fertilization cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(6):1577–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4753-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azkargorta M, Escobes I, Iloro I, et al. Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1898–1906. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan NJ, Stephens AN, Rainczuk A, et al. 2D-DiGE analysis of the human endometrial secretome reveals differences between receptive and nonreceptive states in fertile and infertile women. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(12):6256–6264. doi: 10.1021/pr1004828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar