183
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

“Math cleverly disguised as/with string”: experienced weavers’ engagement with mathematics

ORCID Icon

References

  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
  • Bang, M., Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(35), 13868–13874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706627104
  • Barta, J., & Eglash, R. (2009). Teaching artful expressions of mathematical beauty: Virtually creating native American beadwork and Rug weaving. In J. Braman, G. Vincenti, & G. Trajkovski (Eds.), Handbook of research on computational arts and creative informatics (pp. 280–289). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-352-4.ch016
  • Bevan, B., Peppler, K., Rosin, M., Scarff, L., Soep, E., & Wong, J. (2019). Purposeful pursuits: Leveraging the epistemic practices of the arts and sciences. In A. J. Stewart, M. Mueller, & D. J. Tippins (Eds.), Converting STEM into STEAM programs: Methods and examples from and for education (pp. 21–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25101-7_3
  • Boaler, J., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2012). Gender equity and mathematics education. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 973–976). SAGE Publications.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2019). Designing for rightful presence in STEM: The role of making present practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 616–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1591411
  • Chapkis, W., & Enloe, C. H. (eds.). (1983). Of common cloth: Women in the global textile industry. Transnational Institute.
  • Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women's success in engineering and computing. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036.
  • DeVault, M. L. (1990). Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1990.37.1.03a00070
  • Dew, K. H., Galassi, J. P., & Galassi, M. D. (1984). Math anxiety: Relation with situational test anxiety, performance, physiological arousal, and math avoidance behaviour. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.580
  • Espinoza, M. L., & Vossoughi, S. (2014). Perceiving learning anew: Social interaction, dignity, and educational rights. Harvard Educational Review, 84(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.3.y4011442g71250q2
  • Essinger, J. (2004). Jacquard's web: How a hand-loom led to the birth of the information age. Oxford University Press.
  • Gerdes, P. (2011). African basketry: Interweaving art and mathematics in Mozambique. In Bridges Coimbra mathematics, music, art, architecture, culture conference proceedings (pp. 9–16).
  • Gilmer, G. (1998). Ethnomathematics: An African American perspective on developing women in mathematics. In The First Mathematics Education and Society Conference. MEAS, Nottingham, United Kingdom, September 6-11, 1998.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 11290–11249. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.11290symposium
  • Greenfield, P. M., & Childs, C. P. (1977). Weaving, colour terms and pattern representation: Cultural influences and cognitive development among the Zinacantecos of Southern Mexico. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 23–48. https://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP/article/view/763/658
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Embracing Nepantla: Rethinking “Knowledge” and its use in mathematics teaching. REDIMAT - Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2012.02
  • Hand, V. (2014). “Taking up our space”: Becoming competent mathematics learners in the mathematics classroom. In N. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shrevc, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for Equity: A Framework for Successful Practice. (pp. 91–106). Teachers College Press.
  • Harris, M. (1987). An example of traditional women's work as a mathematics resource. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(3), 26–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40247903
  • Hartsock, N. C. (1983). Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Longman.
  • Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1086/499656
  • Irvine, V., Biedl, T., & Kaplan, C. S., (2020). Quasiperiodic bobbin lace patterns. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 14(3), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2020.1752999
  • Irvine, V. & Ruskey, F. (2014). Developing a mathematical model for bobbin lace. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 8(3-4), 95-110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2014.982938
  • Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Joseph, N. M. (2017). What Plato took for granted: Examining the biographies of the firstfive African American female mathematicians and what that says about resistance to the western epistemological cannon. In B. Polnick, B. Irby, & J. Ballenger (Eds.), Women of colour in STEM: Navigating the workforce (pp. 3–38). Information Age.
  • Joseph, N. M., Hailu, M., & Boston, D. (2017). Black women’s and girls’ persistence in the P–20 mathematics pipeline: Two decades of children, youth, and adult education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16689045
  • Keune, A. (2022). Material syntonicity: Examining computational performance and its materiality through weaving and sewing crafts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2100704
  • Lee, C. D. (2017). Expanding visions of How people learn: The centrality of identity repertoires. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336022
  • Martin, D. (2007). Mathematics learning and participation in African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.) Improving Access to Mathematics: Diversity and Equity in the Classroom. (pp. 146–158). United Kingdom: Teachers College Press.
  • Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., Roche, J., Wong, J., Hurley, M., Bell, P., & Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with STEAM: Conceptualizing art and science for research, policy, and practice. Science Education, 105(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
  • Millroy, W. L. (1991). An ethnographic study of the mathematical ideas of a group of carpenters. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(91)90002-I
  • Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Beacon Press.
  • Nasir, N. I. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6
  • National Research Council. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822.
  • Norris, S. (2011). Identity in (inter)action: Introducing multimodal (inter) action analysis (Vol. 4). Walter de Gruyter.
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
  • Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
  • Plant, S. (1995). The future looms: Weaving women and cybernetics. Body & Society, 1(3-4), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001003003
  • Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 605–624). SAGE.
  • Saxe, G. B., & Gearhart, M. (1990). A developmental analysis of everyday topology in unschooled straw weavers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00840.x
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). MacMillan.
  • Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/494648
  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
  • Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035059

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.