Topic specificity of students’ conceptual and procedural fraction knowledge and its impact on errors

References

• Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2017). An approach for determining the number of clusters in a model-based cluster analysis. Entropy, 19(9), Article 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashlock, R. B. (2009). Error patterns in computation (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, M., Lesh, R. A., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. A. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bempeni, M., Poulopoulou, S., Tsiplaki, I., & Vamvakoussi, X. (2018). Individual differences in fractions’ conceptual and procedural knowledge: What about older students? Proceedings of the 42th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 147–154). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Bempeni, M., Poulopoulou, S., & Vamvakoussi, X. (2021). The approach to mathematics learning as a predictor of individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 66–74). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Skow, K., & the IRIS Center (2016). Mathematics: Identifying and addressing student errors. http://iris.peabodyVanderbilt.edu/case_studies/ics_matherr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & VanLehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science, 4(4), 379–426. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0404_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, L. J. (1928). Analysis of errors in fractions. The Elementary School Journal, 28(10), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1086/456158
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (1991). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1993). Rational numbers: An integration of research. Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. M., & Roche, A. (2009). Students’ fraction comparison strategies as a window into robust understanding and possible pointers for instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9198-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2014). Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review, 34(4), 344–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSSO. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Delazer, M. (2003). Neuropsychological findings on conceptual knowledge of arithmetic. In A. J. Baroody, & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 385–407). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, F., Coche, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, E. H., Son, J. Y., & Stigler, J. W. (2017). Conceptual explanations and understanding fraction comparisons. Learning and Instruction, 52, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, L., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2013). DEMAT 6 + . Deutscher Mathematiktest für sechste Klassen [German mathematics test for grade 6]. Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasalo, L., & Kadijevich, D. (2000). Two types of mathematical knowledge and their relation. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338914
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, D., Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Thorpe, C. M. (2012). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction understanding: The role of abilities and school experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, K. (1981). Fractions. In K. Hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics 11–16 (pp. 66–81). John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K. (1987). Children’s mathematical frameworks: Part two. What are equivalent fractions? Mathematics in School, 16(4), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1988(41), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219884105
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. A., Close, L., & Santisi, M. (2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(4), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. A., & Vagi, K. J. (2012). Patterns of strengths and weaknesses in children’s knowledge about fractions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(2), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge. The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, Understanding, and Skill in Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1403_1
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children’s strategies and errors: A report of the strategies and errors in secondary mathematics project. NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 101–150). Eric.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M. Y., & Murray, S. (2012). Teaching with Procedural Variation: A Chinese Way of Promoting Deep Understanding of Mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, P. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematical functions. University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, K., Dreher, A., Holzäpfel, L., & Wittmann, G. (2020). Are conceptual and procedural knowledge empirically separable? – The case of fractions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, K., Holzäpfel, L., & Wittmann, G. (2019). Aufgaben als Lerngelegenheiten für konzeptuelles und prozedurales Wissen zu Brüchen – Eine vergleichende Schulbuchanalyse [Tasks as learning opportunities for conceptual and procedural fraction knowledge—A comparative textbook analysis]. Mathematica Didactica, 42(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/md/2019.1140
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, K., & Wittmann, G. (2021). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction knowledge: What makes the difference and what does it look like? International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), Article em0615. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9282
   Google Scholar
• Makhubele, Y. E. (2021). The analysis of grade 8 fractions errors displayed by learners due to deficient mastery of prerequisite concepts. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), Article em0645. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11004
   Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Devlin, K. T. (2008). Parts and ‘holes': Gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. Developmental Science, 11(5), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00717.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers. A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/749607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padberg, F., & Wartha, S. (2017). Didaktik der Bruchrechnung. Gemeine Brüche - Dezimalbrüche [Didactics of fractions. Common fractions - decimal fractions]. Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52969-0
   Google Scholar
• Peck, D., & Jencks, S. (1981). Conceptual issues in the teaching and learning of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(5), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.2307/748834
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S. (2012). Why Jonny can't apply multiplication? Revisiting the choice of operations with fractions. International Electric Journal of Mathematics Education, 6, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/262
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65, Article 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhold, F., Obersteiner, A., Hoch, S., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. (2020). The interplay between the natural number bias and fraction magnitude processing in Low-achieving students. Frontiers in Education, 5, 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00029
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teachers at work. Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, L. F., Ye, A., & Jordan, N. C. (2017). Development of fraction comparison strategies: A latent transition analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2014). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102–1118). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics. An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. M., Beymer, P. N., Anderson, D. J., Lissa, C. J. V., & Schmidt, J. A. (2018). TidyLPA: An R package to easily carry out latent profile analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 978. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00978
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sälzer, C., Reiss, K., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Prenzel, M., & Heinze, A. (2013). Zwischen Grundlagenwissen und Anwendungsbezug: Mathematische Kompetenz im internationalen Vergleich [Between basic knowledge and application: Mathematical competency compared to international standards]. In M. Prenzel, C. Sälzer, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2012: Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland (pp. 47–98). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2010). The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T. (2014). Angebots-Nutzungs-Modelle in der Unterrichtspsychologie. Integration von Struktur- und Prozessparadigma [Utilization-of-learning-opportunities models in the psychology of instruction: Integration of the paradigms of structure and of process]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(6), 850–866. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:14686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2015). Conceptual knowledge of fraction arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Pyke, A. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J.-W., & Senk, S. L. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9229-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, G., Bianchi, L., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W. & Houang, R. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., Bempeni, M., Poulopoulou, S., & Tsiplaki, I. (2019). Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of conceptual and procedural knowledge: Reflections on a series of studies on Greek secondary students’ knowledge of fractions. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 6(2), 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, J., Vandewalle, J., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students’ interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations. Learning and Instruction, 37, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Reys, R., & Wu, L. (2010). Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth- and sixth-graders’ textbooks of Singapore, Taiwan, and the USA. School Science and Mathematics, 110(3), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00015.x
   Google Scholar