1,260
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Comparing example generation with classification in the learning of new mathematics concepts

ORCID Icon
Pages 109-132 | Received 26 Nov 2021, Accepted 16 Nov 2022, Published online: 07 Dec 2022

References

  • Alcock, L., Gilmore, C., & Inglis, M. (2013). Experimental methods in mathematics education research. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(2), 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.797731
  • Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2011). Classification and concept consistency. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.570476
  • Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2017). Interactions between defining, explaining and classifying: The case of increasing and decreasing sequences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9709-4
  • Antonini, S. (2006). Graduate students' processes in generating examples of mathematical objects. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 57–64). Charles University.
  • Antonini, S. (2011). Generating examples: Focus on processes. ZDM, 43(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0317-6
  • Antonini, S., Furinghetti, F., Morselli, F., & Tosetto, E. (2007). University students generating examples in real analysis: Where is the definition? In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 5: Fifth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 2241–2249). University of Cyprus.
  • Antonini, S., Presmeg, N., Mariotti, M. A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2011). On examples in mathematical thinking and learning. ZDM, 43(2), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0334-5
  • Bills, L., Dreyfus, T., Mason, J., Tsamir, P., Watson, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2006). Exemplification in mathematics education. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 126–154). Charles University.
  • Bills, L., & Watson, A. (2008). Editorial introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9147-z
  • Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world (2nd ed., Chap. 5, pp. 59–68). Worth Publishers.
  • Breen, S., O'Shea, A., & Pfeiffer, K. (2016). Students' views of example generation tasks. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv017
  • Dahlberg, R. P., & Housman, D. L. (1997). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002999415887
  • Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
  • Edwards, A., & Alcock, L. (2010a). How do undergraduate students navigate their example spaces? In Proceedings of the 13th conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education. MAA.
  • Edwards, A., & Alcock, L. (2010b). Using Rasch analysis to identify uncharacteristic responses to undergraduate assessments. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 29(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq008
  • Foster, C. (2018). Developing mathematical fluency: Comparing exercises and rich tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9788-x
  • Foster, C. (2021). Implementing confidence assessment in low-stakes, formative mathematics assessments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-021-10207-9
  • Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9143-3
  • Goodrich, B., Gabry, J., Ali, I., & Brilleman, S. (2020). Rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. R package version 2.21.1.
  • Iannone, P., Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., Simpson, A., & Weber, K. (2011). Does generating examples aid proof production? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9299-0
  • Kinnear, G. (2021). Two-stage collaborative exams have little impact on subsequent exam performance in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00121-w
  • Kinnear, G., Bennett, M., Binnie, R., Bolt, R., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Reliable application of the MATH taxonomy sheds light on assessment practices. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 39(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrz017
  • Kinnear, G., Jones, I., Sangwin, C., Alarfaj, M., Davies, B., Fearn, S., Foster, C., Heck, A., Henderson, K., Hunt, T., Iannone, P., Kontorovich, I., Larson, N., Lowe, T., Meyer, J. C., O'Shea, A., Rowlett, P., Sikurajapathi, I., & Wong, T. (2022). A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6
  • Kinnear, G., Wood, A. K., & Gratwick, R. (2022). Designing and evaluating an online course to support transition to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1962554
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 573–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029146
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Rejecting or accepting parameter values in Bayesian estimation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771304
  • Melhuish, K., & Thanheiser, E. (2018). Reframing replication studies as studies of generalizability: A response to critiques of the nature and necessity of replication. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0104
  • Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
  • Panse, A., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2018). Reading proofs for validation and comprehension: An expert-novice eye-movement study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0077-6
  • Paoletti, T., Krupnik, V., Papadopoulos, D., Olsen, J., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Weber, K. (2018). Teacher questioning and invitations to participate in advanced mathematics lectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9807-6
  • Pointon, A., & Sangwin, C. J. (2003). An analysis of undergraduate core material in the light of hand-held computer algebra systems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739031000148930
  • Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2016). How effective is example generation for learning declarative concepts? Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9377-z
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
  • Sandefur, J., Mason, J., Stylianides, G. J., & Watson, A. (2013). Generating and using examples in the proving process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9459-x
  • Sangwin, C. J. (2003). New opportunities for encouraging higher level mathematical learning by creative use of emerging computer aided assessment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(6), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390310001595474
  • Sangwin, C. J., & Kinnear, G. (2021). Coherently organised digital exercises and expositions. PRIMUS, 32(8), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2021.1999352
  • Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics: Expanded american edition (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Wagner, E. R., Orme, S. M., Turner, H. J., & Yopp, D. (2017). Encouraging example generation: A teaching experiment in first-semester calculus. PRIMUS, 27(2), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1194340
  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity. Routledge.
  • Watson, A., & Shipman, S. (2008). Using learner generated examples to introduce new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9142-4
  • Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers' professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15–20.
  • Zaslavsky, O. (2019). There is more to examples than meets the eye: Thinking with and through mathematical examples in different settings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.001
  • Zaslavsky, O., Knuth, E., & Ellis, A. (2019). The roles and uses of examples in conjecturing and proving [Special section]. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.001