Promoting learners' self-regulated textbook use for overcoming impasses in solving mathematics exercises

References

• Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Greene, J. A. (2017). Self-regulation in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
   Google Scholar
• Balta, N., Michinov, N., Balyimez, S., & Ayaz, M. F. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect of Peer Instruction on learning gain: Identification of informational and cultural moderators. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2019). Different Reading styles for mathematics text. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9871-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
   Google Scholar
• Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40(4), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1474140
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2340521
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, T., Matano, H., Amano, H., Sugiyama, Y., Handa, S., Ichikawa, S., Iwata, K., Ota, S., Otake, K., Otani, M., Okada, H., Kawasaki, K., Ginnan, Y., Kuga, S., Kodera, T., Kon, M., Sakaori, F., Simuzu, Y., Soeda, Y., … Watanabe, K. (2015). Atarashii sugaku 2 [New mathematics 2]. Tokyo Shoseki.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, M. (2017). Students’ use of mathematics textbooks in relation to their beliefs: About textbooks and teachers’ use of textbooks in mathematics classes. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.65.346
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, M. (2019). Coaching to promote students’ use of textbooks and notebooks: Focus on learning strategies that connect academic work in the classroom and at home. The Journal of Studies on Educational Practices, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.34587/jsep.21.1_1
   Google Scholar
• Ichikawa, S. (2000). Promoting verbal descriptions of concepts, diagrams, and procedures in learning: Suggestions and discussion through cases of cognitive counseling. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.48.3_361
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-Y. (2016). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Sample size calculation 3. Comparison of several means using one-way ANOVA. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 41(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 411–434). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_12
   Google Scholar
• Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y., & Chinn, C. A. (2017). Promoting spontaneous use of learning and reasoning strategies: Theory, research, and practice for effective transfer. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315564029
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nagasaki, E., Nishimura, K., & Ninomiya, Y. (2015). Research and development of mathematics textbooks from the viewpoint of international perspective: From international conference on mathematics textbook research and development 2014: ICMT2014. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 97(5), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.32296/jjsme.97.5_11
   Google Scholar
• Nagasaki, E., Taguchi, S., Matsuda, I. (2010). International comparison of mathematics textbooks. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 92(5), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.32296/jjsme.92.5_9
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9016-y
   Google Scholar
• P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved February 20, 2022, from www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezat, S. (2006). A model of textbook use. 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 409–416.
   Google Scholar
• Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: Students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 45(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0529-z
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820094
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELTJournal, 42(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. D. (2005). Encouraging students to read mathematics. PRIMUS, 15(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970508984113
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. D., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University students’ reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.682959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J., & Jäder, J. (2015). Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.992986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonneberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 72–100. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.5
   Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2010). Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uesaka, Y., & Manalo, E. (2007). Peer instruction as a way of promoting spontaneous use of diagrams when solving math word problems. In D. S. McNamara, & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual cognitive science society (pp. 677–682). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. (2013). Studying textbooks in an information age-a United States perspective. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0514-6
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar