https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-1552
References
- Benacerraf, P. (1965). What numbers could not be. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 47–73. doi:10.2307/2183530
- Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(19), 661–679. doi:10.2307/2025075
- Burgess, J. P. (2015). Rigor and structure. Oxford University Press.
- Burn, B. (1996). What are the fundamental concepts of group theory? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 371–377. doi:10.1007/BF00369154
- De Toffoli, S. (2021). Reconciling rigor and intuition. Erkenntnis, 86(6), 1783–1802. doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00280-x
- Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 267–305. doi:10.1007/BF01273732
- Dutilh Novaes, C. (2021). The dialogical roots of deduction: Historical, cognitive and philosophical perspectives on reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
- Goldin, G. A. (2001). Counting on the metaphorical. Nature, 413(6851), 18–19. doi:10.1038/35092607
- Hamami, Y. (2022). Mathematical rigor and proof. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 15(2), 409–449. doi:10.1017/S1755020319000443
- Hanna, G., & Yan, X. (2021). Opening a discussion on teaching proof with automated theorem provers. For the Learning of Mathematics, 41(3), 42–46.
- Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. Basic Books.
- Manders, K. (2008). The Euclidean Diagram. In P. Mancoscu (Ed.), Philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 80–133). Oxford University Press.
- Mumma, J. (2010). Proofs, pictures, and Euclid. Synthese, 175(2), 255–287. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9509-9
- Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. (2009). A quantitative analysis of children’s splitting operations and fraction schemes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(2-3), 150–161. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.06.002
- Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.