Secondary school mathematics teacher-perceived factors involved in argumentation: an emerging framework

References

• Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attention. (2017). Merriam-Webster's dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attention
   Google Scholar
• Ayalon, M. (2019). Exploring change in teachers’ attention to potential teaching situations of argumentation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2016). Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in classroom argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 575–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K., & Hajjar, K. (2022). Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10121-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.4.0351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Using tasks to explore teacher knowledge in situation-specific contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9043-y
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justifications for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273371
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0101_1
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://corestandards.org/asserts/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Francisco, N. P., & Maher, C. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9144-x
   Google Scholar
• Gal, H. (2011). From another perspective-training teachers to cope with problematic learning situations in geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9321-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakoulias, E., Mastorides, E., Potari, D., & Zachariades, T. (2010). Studying teachers’ mathematical argumentation in the context of refuting students’ invalid claims. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Israel Ministry of Education. (2019). Mathematics curriculum for grades 7-9. http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Mazkirut_Pedagogit/matematika/mavo.pdf (in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Hiebert, J., Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., Garnier, H., & Wearne, D. (2006). Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the United States align with the NCTM standards? Results from the TIMSS 1999 video studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Waege, K. (2015). Learning to teach within practice-based methods courses. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., & Sutherland, J. (2004). Student understanding of generality. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 561–567). OISE/UT.
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosko, K. W., Rougee, A., & Herbst, P. (2014). What actions do teachers envision when asked to facilitate mathematical argumentation in the classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0116-1
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom. Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning and teaching schooling (pp. 731–764). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2008). Being mathematical with and in front of learners: Attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers and learners. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), Vol. 4. The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 31–56). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832714
   Google Scholar
• McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/749827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2012). A framework for analyzing the collaborative construction of arguments and its interplay with agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9354-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparistodemou, E., Potari, D., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2014). Prospective teachers’ attention on geometrical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9518-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potari, D. (2013). Promoting teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical awareness. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9238-3
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue: Argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Deliberative emotional talk. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09304-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Deulofeu, J., & Ulloa, R. (2020). Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 977–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1733686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B., & Umland, K. (2020). Argumentation in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 63–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2014). Supporting student justification in middle school mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ work to create a context for justification. CRME Publications 4. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/merg_docs/4
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M. H. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2-3), 161–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M., & Newton, J. (2016). Teachers’ contextualization of argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M., & Truxaw, M. (2009). A journey with justification: Issues arising from the implementation and evaluation of the math ACCESS project. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5, 827–835.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analysing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar