714
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Philosophy of science and leisure research: an exploratory analysis of research paradigms

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 123-147 | Received 31 Jan 2022, Accepted 09 Feb 2023, Published online: 08 Mar 2023

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2000). Poststructural feminist theories of representing others: A response to the ‘crisis’ in leisure studies’ discourse. Leisure Studies, 19(3), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360050023044
  • Bedini, L. A., & Wu, Y. M. (1994). A methodological review of research in therapeutic recreation journal from 1986 to 1990. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 28, 87.
  • Berbary, L. A. (2017). Thinking through post-structuralism in leisure studies: A detour around “proper” humanist knowledges. In The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 719–741). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_41
  • Biedenbach, T., & Müller, R. (2011). Paradigms in project management research: Examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111096908
  • Chen, W., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00173.x
  • Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 601–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044725-4/50009-6
  • Coalter, F. (1997). Leisure sciences and leisure studies: Different concept, same crisis? Leisure Sciences, 19(4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409709512254
  • Denzin, N. K. (2008). The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390802136995
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1899). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Lippincott. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201802
  • Dupuis, S. L. (1999). Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904099273282
  • Fazlıoğulları, O. (2012). Scientific research paradigms in social sciences. International Journal of Educational Policies, 6(1), 41–55.
  • Floyd, M. F. (2014). Social justice as an integrating force for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.917002
  • Floyd, M. F., Bocarro, J. N., & Thompson, T. D. (2008). Research on race and ethnicity in leisure studies: A review of five major journals. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2008.11950130
  • Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018007004
  • Gholson, B., & Barker, P. (1985). Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. The American Psychologist, 40(7), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.40.7.755
  • Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226300610.001.0001
  • Goodale, T. L. (1990). Perceived freedom as leisure’s antithesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(4), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969834
  • Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage Publications.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Sage Publications.
  • Guo, Z., & Sheffield, J. (2008). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of knowledge management research: 2000 to 2004. Decision Support Systems, 44(3), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.006
  • Hassan, N. R., Mingers, J., & Stahl, B. (2018). Philosophy and information systems: Where are we and where should we go? European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1470776
  • Hemingway, J. L. (1995). Leisure studies and interpretive social inquiry. Leisure Studies, 14(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614369500390031
  • Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.583166
  • Hooks, B. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. Beyond Words/Atria Books.
  • Hylton, K. (2005). ‘Race’, sport and leisure: Lessons from critical race theory. Leisure Studies, 24(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360412331313494
  • Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press.
  • Kumm, B. E., & Berbary, L. A. (2018). Questions for postqualitative inquiry: Conversations to come. Leisure Sciences, 40(1–2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1376014
  • Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450144
  • Lather, P., & St Pierre, E. (2005). Post-positivist new paradigm inquiry. Class handout, ELAN 8560. Theoretical Frameworks for Doctoral Students in the Human Science.
  • Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., Thagard, P., & Wykstra, S. (1986). Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research. Synthese, 69(2), 141–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00413981
  • Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative researchVol. 4(2), 97-128. Sage Publications.
  • McLean, D. J. (1996). Leisure research and methodological pluralism: A response to hemmingway. Leisure Studies, 15(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143696375675
  • Morris, A. (2017). The scholar denied: WEB Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. University of California Press.
  • Mowatt, R. A. (2012). Lynching as leisure: Broadening notions of a field. The American Behavioral Scientist, 56(10), 1361–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212454429
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1
  • Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C. W. (2007). Contextualizing leisure research to encompass complexity in lived leisure experience: The need for creative analytic practice. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400601160721
  • Parry, D. C., Johnson, C. W., & Stewart, W. (2013). Leisure research for social justice: A response to Henderson. Leisure Sciences, 35(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.739906
  • Riddick, C. C., DeSchriver, M., & Weissinger, E. (1984). A methodological review of research in journal of leisure research from 1978 to 1982. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(4), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1984.11969602
  • Riddick, C. C., DeSchriver, M., & Weissinger, E. (1988). A methodological review of the Journal of Leisure Research from 1983-1987. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
  • Sandu, A. (2011). Assumption of post-structuralism in contemporary epistemology. Postmodern Openings, 2(7), 39–52.
  • Shannon, C., Oncescu, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2016). The potential of leisure education to address the ‘wicked problems’ prioritized in a framework for recreation in Canada. Leisure/loisir, 40(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2016.1252937
  • Shaw, S. M. (1997a). Controversies and contradictions in family leisure: An analysis of conflicting paradigms. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1997.11949785
  • Shaw, S. M. (1997b). Cultural determination, diversity, and coalition in leisure research: A commentary on coalter and mommaas. Leisure Sciences, 19(4), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409709512257
  • Stewart, W. P., Parry, D. C., & Glover, T. D. (2008). Writing leisure: Values and ideologies of research. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(3), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2008.11950145
  • Sylvester, C. (1990b). Overview: Special issue on leisure sciences, dominant paradigms and philosophy. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(4), 281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969831
  • Taff, B. D., Dattilo, J., Davis, K. D., & Moeller, J. D. (2016). Leisure perceptions of combat veterans of operations enduring freedom and Iraqi freedom. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(4), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i4-6854
  • Tribe, J. (2001). Research paradigms and the tourism curriculum. Journal of Travel Research, 39(4), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750103900411
  • Veal, T. (1998). Leisure studies, pluralism and social democracy. Leisure Studies, 17(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143698375097
  • Weissinger, E. (1990). Of revolutions and resistance: A response to philosophical criticisms of social scientific leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969836
  • Weissinger, E., Henderson, K. A., & Bowling, C. P. (1997). Toward an expanding methodological base in leisure studies: Researchers’ knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning qualitative research. Loisir Et Societe/Society and Leisure, 20(2), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1997.10715552

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.