Modification of the Threshold Equalising Noise (TEN) test for cochlear dead regions for use with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing loss

References

• Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedures for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 213–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T., Dillon H., Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1128–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12: 47–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Houtsma A.J.M. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 961–965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 432–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D.C. Statistical Methods for PsychologyFourth Edition. Duxbury, Belmont, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. 1989. Acoustics – Audiometric test methods – Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO 8253-1:1989. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Keppel G. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 1991
   Google Scholar
• Kluk, K. & Moore, B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res, (in press).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Crocker T.L., Davis R.A. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 498–507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 524–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Practical application of the TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions. Iran Audiol 2002; 1: 17–21
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 2004; 188: 70–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Killen T., Munro K.J. Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe to profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 465–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N., Byrne D. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986; 8: 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Pick G., Evans E.F., Wilson J.P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 273–281
   Google Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 391–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Burns E.M., Nelson D.A. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 966–975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Cummings K.J. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 47–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Hall J.W., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J., Patterson R.D. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing-impaired. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 1363–1368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tasell D.J., Turner C.W. Speech recognition in a special case of low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 1207–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogten L.L.M. Pure-tone masking: A new result from a new method. Facts and Models in Hearing, E. Zwicker, E. Terhardt. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1974; 142–155
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Flottorp G., Stevens S.S. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 548–557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar