Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for targeted hearing screening

References

• Clemens C.J., Davis S.A., Bailey A.R. The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2000; 106: E7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R., Tomlin D., Rance G., Ming W.J. The auditory steady state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002a; 13: 173–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Parker J., Swiderski N., Rickards F. The auditory steady-state response: full-term and premature neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 2002b; 13: 260–269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Rickards F., Poulis C., Parker J., Tan L., et al. The auditory steady-state response: Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002c; 13: 270–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coplan J., Gleason J.R., Ryan R., Burke M.G., Williams M.L. Validation of an Early Language Mileston Scale in a high-risk population. Pediatrics 1982; 70: 677–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox L., Hack M., Metz D. Longitudinal ABR in the NICU infant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1982; 4: 225–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A., Bamford J., Wilson I., Ramkalawan T., Forshaw M., et al. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assessment 1997; 1(10)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John MS., Van Roon P., Picton T.W. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 100–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., VanRoon P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dort J.C., Tobolski C., Brown D. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: Which test is best?. J Otololaryngol 2000; 29: 206–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durieux- Smith A., Picton T.W., Bernard P., MacMurray B., Goodman J.T. Prognostic validity of brainstem electric-response audiometry (BERA) in infants of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Audiology 1991; 30: 249–265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling, C., Sturzebecher, E., & Cebulla, M. 2004. Automated auditory response detection statistical problem with repeated testing. Presented at the International Conference on Newborn Hearing Screening Diagnosis and Intervention (NHS2004), program oral sessions, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Firszt J.B., Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson C.L., Burg L.S., Wackym P.A. Auditory sensitivity in children using the auditory steady state response. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 536–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Wilson M.J., Silva P.D. Identifying hearing loss in the intensive care nursery: a 20-year summary. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 151–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Worthington D.W., Reiland J.K., Beauchaine K.A., Goldar D.E. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.A., Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 3: 87–97
   Google Scholar
• Gravel J., Berg A., Bradley M., et al. New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 131–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes D. Screening methods: Current status. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2003; 9: 65–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hecox K., Cone B. Prognostic importance of brainstem auditory evoked responses after asphyxia. Neurology 1981; 31: 1429–1433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. International Journal of Audiology 2003; 42: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M.L., Riko K., Malizia K. Audiometric accuracy of the cABR in infants at risk for hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 59–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson J., Morehouse C. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses and behavioral screening in high-risk and normal newborn infants. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 247–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson J.T., Jacobson C.A., Spahr R.C. Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 187–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 106–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Brown D., Muir P., Picton T.W. Use of modulated noise in newborn hearing screening. Presented at the 18th Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. June 2003; 8–12: 2003
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing position statement. ASHA 1994; 36: 38–41
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. 2000. Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Pediatrics, 106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H., Desloovere C., Kumar A., Vandermeersch E., Wouters J. Objective assessment of frequency specific hearing threshold in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 915–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano M., Piñeiro A., Perera M. Asimilación y modificación de un test de pesquisaje para detectar tempranamente trastornos del lenguaje. Rev Cub Psicol 1997; 14: 120–128
   Google Scholar
• Mason S., Davis A., Wood S. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening using the Nottingham ABR screener. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 91–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason J.A., Herrmann K.R. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 221–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland R., Watson D., Lawless V., Houston H., Adams D. Reliability and effectiveness of screening for hearing loss in high-risk neonates. BMJ 1992; 304: 806–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl A.L., Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening. The great omission. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencher G., Davis A., DeVoe S., Beresford D., Bamford J. Universal neonatal hearing screening: Past, present, and future. Am J Audiol 2001; 10: 3–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mencher G., Mencher L. Infant hearing assessment utilizing auditory brainstem techniques. Scand Audiol 1983; 17: 102–106
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud Pública de Cuba (MINSAP). Sedantes y ansiolíticos. Formulario Nacional de Medicamentos, N. Cheping, M.E. Diaz. Ciencias Médicas, La Habana 2003; 525–526
   Google Scholar
• Mjoen S. ABR in pediatric audiology. Scand Audiol (supplement) 1981; 13: 141–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore E.J. Bases of Auditory Brain-Stem Evoked Responses. Grune & Stratton, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Morlet T., Ferber-Viart C., Putet G., Sevin F., Duclaux R. Auditory screening in high-risk pre-term and full-term neonates using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 45: 31–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH Consensus Statement. Early Identification of Hearing Impairment in Infants and Young Children 1993; 1–3, 11: 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Norton S.J, Gorga M.P., Widen J.E. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 508–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Perera M., Bobes M., Valdes M., Sanchez M. Caracterización de los potenciales evocados auditivos de tallo cerebral en lactantes cubanos. Rev Cub Invest Biomed 1986; 5: 419–429
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo, M.C., Rodríguez, L., Ponce de Leon, M., Viera, C., & Aguiar, M. 1987. Pesquisaje auditivo en niños egresados de unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Estudios Avanzados en Neurociencias. Supp., CNIC, 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Abalo, M.C. (2001) , Savio, G., González, A., Hernández, O., Ponce de León, M., , et al. 2001b. Hearing screening with multiple frequency steady state responses: a pilot study. Presented at the 17th Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, Vancouver, BCCanada, July, 22–27, .
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., et al. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal subjects. Ear Hear 2001a; 22: 200–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Linden R.D., Hamel G., Maru J.T. Aspects of Averaging. Seminars in Hearing 1983; 4: 324–340
   Google Scholar
• Rance G., Dowell R.C., Rickards F.W., Beer D.E., Clark G.M. Steady state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 48–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 236–245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rickards F.W., Tan L.E., Cohen L.T., Wilson O.J., Drew J.H., et al. Auditory steady state evoked potentials in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savio G., Perez-Abalo M.C., Valdes J.L., Martin V., Sierra C., et al. Potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias: Una nueva alternativa para evaluar la audición en forma objetiva. Acta de ORL y CCC 1997; 25: 87–97
   Google Scholar
• Savio G., Cardenas J., Perez Abalo M.C., Gonzalez A., Valdes J. The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 279–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Cone-Wesson B., Folsom R.C., Gorga M.P., Vohr B.R., et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 383–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Gravel J.S., Martin B.A. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 361–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells, D.R (October, 1998) . 2000. Frequency specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A sound foundation through early amplification. Proceedings of an international conference., Chicago, Illinois, 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Starr A., Amlie R., Martin W. Development of auditory function in newborn infants revealed by auditory brainstem potentials. Pediatrics 1977; 60: 831–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J., Webb H., Hutchinson J., Connell J., Smith M., et al. Evaluation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in the newborn. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 11–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stueve M.P., O′Rourke C. Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods. Am J Audiol 2003; 12: 125–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torres, A., Perez Abalo, M. C., Rioja, L., Rodríguez, E., de Armas, J. L., , et al. 2003. Nueva versión en Windows del sistema AUDIX para la evaluación objetiva de la audición. [enlinea]. Auditio: Revista electrónica de audiología, 2((1)), 3–9. ( http://www.auditio.com/revista/pdf/vol2/1/020102.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Valdes J.L., Perez-Abalo M.C., Martin V., Savio G., Sierra C., et al. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state response. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Werff K.R., Brown C.J., Gienapp B.A., Schmidt Clay K.M. Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response thresholds in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 227–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White K.R., Vohr B.R., Behrens T.R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Seminars in Hearing 1993; 14: 18–29
   Google Scholar