Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children

References

• Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 1997; 18: S140–1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 365–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears?. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 9–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Hill M, Dillon H. Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 513–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 3586–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolaver A, Lowder M, Abbas P, Brown C, Hughes M, Preece J.P. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol 2002; 23: 169–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: Effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 375–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RF, Kirk KI. Speech and language development in cognitively delayed children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 132–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, PM and Litovsky, RY. (2006). Effect of masker type on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. J. Acous. Soc. Am., In press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, GL, Litovsky, RY, Agrawal, SS and van Hoesel, RJ. (2005). Effect of stimulation rate and interaural electrode pairing on ITD sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users. CIAP Abstracts, p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1351–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY, Macmillan NA. Sound localization precision under conditions of the precedence effect: effects of azimuth and standard stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 752–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litovsky RY. Developmental changes in the precedence effect: Estimates of Minimal Audible Angle. J Acoust Soc Amer 1997; 102: 1739–1745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, RY. (2003). Method and system for rapid and reliable testing of speech intelligibility in children. U.S. Patent No. 6,584,440.
   Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otology Head and Neck Surgery 2004; 130: 648–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, RY, Agrawal, SS, Jones, GL, Henry, BA and van Hoesel, RJ. (2005). Effect of interaural electrode pairing on binaural sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abstract: 168.
   Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY. Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. J Acoust Soc Amer 2005; 117: 3091–3099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal SS, Parkinson A, Peters R, Lake J. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 43–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 1565–1574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller J, Schon F, Helms J. Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 198–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie K, Stickney G, Zeng FG. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52: 64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 205–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PB, Jin SH. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 2286–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothauser E H, Chapman WD, Guttman N, Nordby KS, Silbiger HR, Urbanek GE, Weinstock M. I.E.E.E. recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans Aud Electroacoust 1969; 17: 227–246
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein JT, Hong R. Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2003; 191: 14–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 197–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116(2)1081–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney GS, Nie K, Zeng FG. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118(4)2412–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE. A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128(11)1255–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 98–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2004; 9: 234–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 137–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R, Tyler R. Speech perception, localization and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 1617–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Preece JP. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11(5)388–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 2001a; 63: 1293–1313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 2001b; 63: 1314–1329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LP, Fu QJ. Spectral subtraction based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1001–1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng FG. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004; 2004(8(1))1–34
   Google Scholar