Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial

References

• Dolan P., Gudex C., Kind P., Williams A. A social tariff for the EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. University of York: Centre for Health Economics (Discussion Paper 138). 1995
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M.F., Sculpher M.J., Torrance G.W., O'Brien B.J., Stoddart G.L. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes3rd Edition. Oxford University Press Inc, New York 2005
   Google Scholar
• Feeny D., Furlong W., Torrance G., Goldsmith C. H., Zhu Z., et al. Multi-Attribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. Med Care 2002; 40: 113–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004; 43: 85–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn-Inacker H., Shehata-Dieler W., Muller J., Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 1257–1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz R., Oxman A.D. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998; 317: 1185–1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszig R., Aschendorff A., Stecker M., Muller-Deile J., Maune S., et al. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25: 958–968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J., Peters R., Lake J., et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 648–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R.T., Bichey B.G. Cochlear implantation for tinnitus suppression. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2003; 36: 345–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRC Institute of Hearing Research. 1998. The Glasgow Health Status Questionnaires Manual: 1998. Accessed from, , http://www.ihr.gla.ac.uk/products/ghsq.php. on 24th October 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden R., Greenham P., O'Driscoll M., Mawman D., Proops D., et al. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adults with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 988–998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlins M.D., Culyer A.J. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgements. BMJ 2004; 329: 224–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich P., Nopp P., D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 197–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Z.M., Delgutte B., Oxenham A.J. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002; 416: 87–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield A.Q., Marshall D.H., Barton G.R., Bloor K.E. Cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 125512–62
   Google Scholar
• Torrance G.W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986; 5: 1–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance G.W., Furlong W., Feeny D., Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 7: 503–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse A., Pritchard C., Devlin N. Cost Effectiveness Thresholds: Economic and Ethical Issues. King's Fund & Office of Health Economics, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Parkinson A.J., Woodworth G.G., Lowder M.W., Gantz B.J. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 508–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Cochlear Implant Study Group. 2004a. Criteria of candidature for unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults I: Theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear, 25, 310–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Kingdom Cochlear Implant Study Group. 2004b. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults II: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear, 25, 336–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Hoesel R.J., Tyler R.S. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 1617–1630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuur C.A., Lutman M.E., Ramsden R., Greehman P., O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 965–971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B.S., Sun, X., Schatzer, R., Wolford, R.D. 2004. Representation of fine structure or fine frequency information with cochlear implants. Elsevier International Congress Series, 1273, 3–6..
   Google Scholar