References
- Bamford J., Wilson I. Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists. Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children, J. Bench, J. Bamford. Academic Press, LondonUK 1979; 146–187
- Bentler R.A. List equivalency and test-retest reliability of the speech in noise test. Am J Audiol 2000; 9(2)84–100
- Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1990
- Cacace A.T., McFarland D.J. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 355–373
- Cameron S. & Dillon H. (in press). The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Development, sentence normalization study and normative data study. Ear Hear.
- Cameron S. & Dillon H. 2006. Listening in Spatialized Noise Test (LISN®)-Sentences (Version 1.0.0) [Computer software]. Sydney, NSW: National Acoustic Laboratories.
- Cameron S., Dillon H., Newall P. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Ear Hear 2006a; 27(1)30–42
- Cameron S., Dillon H., Newall P. Listening in spatialized noise test: Normative data for children. Int J Audiol 2006b; 45: 99–108
- Cameron S., Dillon H., Newall P. The listening in spatialized noise test: An auditory processing disorder study. J Am Acad Audiol 2006c; 17(5)304–318
- Cameron S., Dillon H., Newall P. Three case studies of children with suspected auditory processing disorder. Aust & NZ J Audiol 2005; 27(2)97–112
- Hernwig L.H., Olsen S.Ø. Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 509–512
- Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA 1997
- Keith R.W. SCAN: Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1986
- Mackersie C.L., Boothroyd A., Minniear D. Evaluation of the computer-assisted speech perception assessment test (CASPA). J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(8)390–396
- McFarland D.J., Cacace A.T. Current controversies in CAPD: From Procrustes’ bed to Pandora's box. An Introduction to Auditory Processing Disorders in Children, T. Parthasarathy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2006; 247–264
- McNemar Q. Psychological Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY 1969
- Ruscetta M.N., Palmer C.V., Durrant J.D., Grayhack J., Ryan C. Validity, internal consistency, and test/retest reliability of a localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 585–595
- Sussman E., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1999; 36: 22–34
- Wagener K.C., Brand T. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 144–156
- Wagener K., Josvassen J.L., Ardenkjær R. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 10–17