Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM²/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults

References

• American National Standards Institute. 2004. Specifications for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-2004. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Kim Y., Suzuki Y., Fuse T., et al. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993; 65: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R., Jerger J.J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van R.P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Hoover B.M., Dierking D.M., Beauchaine K.L., et al. Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 302–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Picton T.W., Stapells D.R. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1569–1582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Brown D.K., Muir P.J., Picton T.W. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 539–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2001a; 112: 555–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002a; 23: 106–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., van Roon P., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 2001b; 6: 12–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Picton T.W. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 125–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2002b; 13: 246–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuwada S., Batra R., Maher V.L. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21: 179–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi E.C., Folsom R.C., Dobie R.A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H., Wouters J. Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: The influence of test duration. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 471–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., et al. Steady-state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitot C., Collet L., Durrant J.D. Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR): Effects of modulation and carrier frequencies. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 567–573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S. Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 541–554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De V.S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards F.W., Tan L.E., Cohen L.T., Wilson O.J., Drew J.H., et al. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A., Stapells D.R. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 611–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Linden D., Suffield J.B., Hamel G., Picton T.W. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzebecker E., Cebulla M., Pschirrer U. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology 2001; 40: 63–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vander Werff K.R., Brown C.J. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 310–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar