Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin

References

• Academia Sinica Computing Center 1997. Academia Sinica balanced corpus of modern Chinese. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from http://www.sinica.edu.tw/ftms-bin/kiwi1/mkiwi.sh?language = 1.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksandrovsky I.V., McCullough J.K., Wilson R.H. Development of suprathreshold word recognition test for Russian-speaking patients. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 417–425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1999. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. ANSI S3.1–1999. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 2004. Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6–2004. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA. 1990. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle-ear disorders. ASHA, 32, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ashoor A.A., Prochazka T. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry for children. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 229–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Edgerton B.J., Svihovec D.V. A comparison of the Auditec of St. Louis cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on a normal-hearing population. J Speech Hear Disord 1977; 42: 60–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell G.L. Compendium of the World's Languages. Routledge, London & New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Chao Y.R. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. University of California Press, Berkeley 1968
   Google Scholar
• Christensen L.K. 1995. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Spanish speech audiometry. Unpublished master's thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng R.L. A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin and Peking Mandarin. Lang 1985; 61: 352–377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fon J., Chiang W. What does Chao have to say about tones?: A case study of Taiwan Mandarin. J Chin Ling 1999; 27: 13–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Zeng F.G., Shannon R.V., Soli S.D. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 505–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer L.F. 1997. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Italian speech audiometry materials. Unpublished master's thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Goffi M.V.S., Pedalini M.E.B., Merrill A., Gygi M.A. Psychometrically equivalent Brazilian Portuguêse bisyllabic word recognition materials spoken by male and female talkers. Pró-Fono 2001; 13: 249–262
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Kim E., Eggett D.L. Psychometrically equivalent Korean bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Korean J Commun Disord 2003; 8: 217–243
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Nielson W.S., McPherson D.L., Skarzynski H., Eggett D.L. Psychometrically equivalent Polish bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Audiofonologia 2004; 25: 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W. & Nissen S.L. 2006. Brigham Young University Taiwan Mandarin Speech Audiometry Materials [ Compact Disc]. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I.J., Davis H., Silverman S.R., Reynolds E.G., Eldert E., et al. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord 1952; 17: 321–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang T.S., Wang N.M., Liu S.Y. Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 294–298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudgins C.V., Hawkins J.E., Karlin J.E., Stevens S.S. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 57–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Are some more equal than others?. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzner K. The Languages of the World. Routledge, London & New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Kubler C. The development of Mandarin in Taiwan: A case study of language contact. Student Book Co., Ltd, Taipei 1985
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y.L. A study on code-switching in Taiwan. Stud Ling Sci 1981; 11: 121–136
   Google Scholar
• Li D.C.C. 1984. The sociolinguistic context of Mandarin in Taiwan; trends and developments. Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Gainesville, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li D.C.C. Problems and trends of standardization of Mandarin Chinese in Taiwan. Anthrop Ling 1985; 27: 122–140
   Google Scholar
• Li C.N., Thompson S.A. Chinese. The World's Major Languages, B. Comrie. Oxford University Press, New York 1987; 811–833
   Google Scholar
• Lin H. Mandarin neutral tone as a phonologically low tone. J Chin Lang and Comp 2006; 16: 121–134
   Google Scholar
• Mangum T.C. 2005. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Japanese speech audiometry materials. Master's thesis, Brigham Young University. Provo, UT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Masci, D. 2000, November 17. Future of language. The CQ Researcher Online, 10, 929–952. Retrieved March 24, 2005, from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2000111700.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews R.H. 1944. Mathews’ Chinese-English Dictionary ( Revised American ed.). Shanghai: China Inland Mission.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle R.A., Wilson R.H. Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 157–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Jennings L., Eggett D.L., Buck H. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers. Int J Audiol 2005a; 44: 379–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Jennings L., Eggett D.L., Buck H. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin. Int J Audiol 2005b; 44: 391–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng F.C.C. Historical linguistics and dialectology: A case study of Taiwan. Lang Sci 1991; 13: 317–333
   Google Scholar
• Penrod J.P. Speech threshold and word recognition/discrimination testing. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 147–164
   Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon I. Speech recognition thresholds for multilingual populations. Commun Disord Q 2001; 22: 158–162
   Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon I., Proctor A., Lansing C.R., Bilger R.C. Digit speech recognition thresholds (SRT) for non-native speakers of English. Am J Audiol 2002; 11: 23–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roup C.M., Wiley T.L., Safady S.H., Stoppenbach D.T. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol 1998; 7: 55–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studio Audio & Video Ltd. 2004. SADiE disk editor software [5.2.2] (computer program).
   Google Scholar
• von Hapsburg D.V., Pena E.D. Understanding bilingualism and its impact on speech audiometry. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45: 202–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan I., Jaeger J. The phonological representation of Taiwan Mandarin vowels: A psycholinguistic study. J East Asian Ling 2003; 12: 205–257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q., Gu R., Han D., Yang W. Familial auditory neuropathy. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1623–1629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B.K., Huang T.S. Current clinical results of the cochlear implant program conducted on Mandarin-speaking patients. Am J Otol 1988; 9: 44–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weisleder P., Hodgson W.R. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition-ability lists. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 387–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Strouse A. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1336–1346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W.J., Moodley S. Use of the CID W22 as a South African English speech discrimination test. S Afr J Commun Disord 2000; 47: 57–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong L.L.N., Soli S. The development of the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT). Ear Hear 2005; 26: 276–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Almanac and Book of Facts 2005. New York: World Almanac Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Young L.L., Dudley B., Gunter M.B. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 586–593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou X., Marslen-Wilson W. Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Lang Cogn Processes 1995; 10: 545–600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar