Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors

References

• Allen J.B. Short term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech. Signal Processing 1977; 25: 235–238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specification of hearing aid characteristics. ANSI S3.22, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan U., Freyman R.L., Chiang Y.C., Nerbonne G.P., Shea K.J. Consonant recognition for spectrally degraded speech as a function of consonant-vowel intensity ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 3758–3769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench J. & Bamford J. 1979. Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R., Nelson J. Assessing release time options in a two channel AGC hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 6: 43–51
   Google Scholar
• Braida L.D., Durlach N.I., de Gennaro S.V., Bustamante D.K. "Review of recent research on multiband amplitude compression for the hearing impaired". The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report, G.A. Studebaker, F.H. Bess. Upper Darby, , PA 1982; 133–140
   Google Scholar
• Freyman R.L., Nerbonne G.P., Cote H.A. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 415–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 77–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings: Patterns of benefit. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 130–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M. Effects of multichannel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 369–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L., Thyer N. Acoustic analyses of speech through a hearing aid: Perceptual effects of changes with two-channel compression. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 414–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Souza P.M. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing-aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 651–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerlvall L.B., Lindblad A.C. The influence of attack and release time on speech intelligibility. A study on the effects on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Scand Audiol Suppl 1978; 6: 341–353
   Google Scholar
• King A.B., Martin M.C. Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids?. Br J Audiol 1984; 18: 31–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lunner T. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 49–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1995. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 62–87.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid. Scand Audiol Suppl 1993; 38: 82–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Stainsby T.H., Alcantara J.I., Kuhnel V. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 399–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller T.F., Harris F.P., Ellison J.C. Effect of release time on preferred gain and speech acoustics. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 605–615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nábělek I.V. Discriminability of the quality of amplitude compressed speech. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 571–577
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nábělek I.V., Robinette L.N. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression. Audiology 1977; 16: 73–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novick M.L., Bentler R.A., Dittberner A., Flamme G.A. Effects of release time and directionality on unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings in complex sound fields. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 534–544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Bakke M.H., Mackersie C., Hellman S., Levitt H. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: Paired-comparison judgement of quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 3182–3187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Bakke M.H., Mackersie C., Hellman S., Levitt H. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 2273–2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer H.C., Causey G.D. The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids. Audiology 1977; 16: 61–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon R., Zeng F-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995; 270: 303–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Fu Q.-J., Galvin J. III. The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Otolaryng Suppl 2004; 552: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• van Tasell D.J., Trine T.D. Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 912–922
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Toor T., Verschuure H. Effects of high-frequency emphasis and compression time constants on speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 379–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar