Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users

References

• Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4(11)417–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A., Hitch G. Working memory. Recent Advances in Learning & Motivation, G.A. Bower. Academic Press, New York 1974; 8: 47–90
   Google Scholar
• Brand T. Analysis and Optimization of Psychophysical Procedures in Audiology. Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem, Oldenburg 2000
   Google Scholar
• Boutla M., Supalla T., Newport E.L., Bavelier D. Short-term memory span: Insights from sign language. Nature Neuroscience 2004; 7(9)997–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman M., Carpenter P.A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verb Learn & Verb Beh 1980; 19: 450–466
   Google Scholar
• Danenman M., Merikle P.M. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psych Bull & Rev 1996; 3(4)422–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Hearing Aids. Thieme, Stuttgart 2001
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W.A., Verschuure H., Ludvigsen C., Westermann S. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. Audiology 2001; 40: 148–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duquesnoy A.J. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 739–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo C., Rudner M., Rönnberg J., Lunner T. Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 553–566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42(Suppl 1)S77–S85
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Linear and non-linear hearing aid fittings. 2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 153–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B., Kinnefors C. Efficient adaptive methods for measurements of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 71–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren M., Larsby B, Lyxell B., Arlinger S. Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 357–370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannon B., Daneman M. A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. J Educ Psychol 2001; 93(1)103–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C.J., Stone M.A. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123(2)1140–1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. Factors underlying the speach-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 122: 1112–1132
   Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. Do ‘audiotory processing’ tests measure auditory processing in the elderly?. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 109–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hygge S., Rönnberg J., Larsby B., Arlinger S. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects’ ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 208–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Souza P E. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 48: 651–667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingberg T., Forssberg H., Westerberg H. Training of working memory in children. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2002; 24: 781–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson J.F., Schartz H.A., Gantz B.J., Tyler R.S., Hinrichs J.V., et al. Psychological change following 18 months of cochlear implant use. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 877–882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsby, B. Hällgren, M. &Lyxell, B. The interface of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impared subject Int J Audiol, 47, 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S., Moore B.C.J. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 18866–18869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner T. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2003; 42(Suppl 1)S49–S58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner T., Sundewall-Thorén E. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 539–552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake A., Shah P. Models of Working Memory. CUP, CambridgeUK 1999
   Google Scholar
• R Näätänen, this issue. The mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of central auditory system plasticity
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L-G. Memory function in normal aging. Acta Neurol Scand 2003; 107(Supple. 179)7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception and comprehension. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S59–S67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiological rehabilitation. Trends Amplif 2006; 10(1)29–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Repovs G., Baddeley A. The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 2006; 139(1)5–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J. Cognitive and communicative function: the effects of chronological age and ‘handicap age’. Europ J Cogn Psychol 1990; 2(3)253–273
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M. & Foo C. In press. The cognitive neuroscience of signed language: applications to a working memory system for sign and speech In: L. Bäckman and L. Nyberg, Memory, Aging and the Brain: A Festschrift in honour of Lars-Göran Nilsson London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Foo C. & Lunner T. This issue. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding Int J Audiol, 47, 82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Ingvar M. Neural correlates of working memory for sign language. Cogn Brain Res 2004; 20(2)165–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudner M., Foo C., Rönnberg J. & Lunner T. 2008. Phonological mismatch causes explicit cognitive processing when listening conditions are taxing Submitted manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner M., Fransson P., Ingvar M., Nyberg L., Rönnberg J. Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the EB of working memory. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 2258–2276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner M. & Rönnberg J. 2008. Explicit processing demands reveal language modality specific organization of working memory J Deaf Stud Deaf Edu, doi:10.1093/deafed/enn005.
   Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affects intelligibility in a competing speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116(4)2311–2323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Josvassen J.L., Ardenkjaer R. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 10–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M., Bettger J., Niculae I., Klima E. Modality of language shapes working memory. J Deaf Stud Deaf Edu 1997; 2: 150–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson M., Emmorey K. A “word length effect” for sign language: further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory. Mem & Cogn 1998; 26(3)584_590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M., Emmorey K. A visuospatial ‘phonological loop’ in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory Cogn 1997; 25: 313–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar