Hearing impairment, work, and vocational enablement

References

• Boothroyd A. Adult aural rehabilitation: What is it and does it work?. Trends Amplif 2007; 11(2)63–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg E. Ecological aspects of auditory rehabilitation. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120(2)234–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boymans M., Goverts S.T, Kramer S.E., Festen J.M & Dreschler W.A 2008. A prospective multi-centre study of the benefits of bilateral hearing aids. Accepted for publication in Ear Hear.
   Google Scholar
• Colledge A.L., Johns R.E., Thomas M.H. Functional ability assessment: Guidelines for the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41(3)172–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijpers M. & Lautenbach H. 2006. Disabled employees. Report of the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B., Coniavitis Gellerstedt L. Psychosocial work environment, hearing impairment, and health. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 383–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark B. A review of the psychosocial effects of hearing impairment in the working age population. The Impact of Genetic Hearing Impairment, D. Stephens, L. Jones. Whurr, London 2005; 106–136
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf R., Bijl R. Determinants of mental distress in adults with a severe auditory impairment: Differences between prelingual and postlingual deafness. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 61–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jager H.J., Goedegebure A. Het expertisecenter Gehoor en Arbeid voor slechthorende werknemers (Dutch). The expertise center for hearing and work for employees with hearing impairment. Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde 2003; 11(1)14–15
   Google Scholar
• Demorest M.E., Erdman S.A. Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1987; 52(2)129–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Detaille S.I., Haafkens M.A., Van Dijk F.J.H. What employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and hearing loss need to cope at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 29(2)134–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(4)1725–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43(2)85–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Linear and nonlinear hearing-aid fittings, 2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol 2006; 45(3)153–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George E.L., Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Festen J.M., et al. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121(14)2362–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby A., Ringdahl A. Does having a job improve the quality of life among post-lingually deafened Swedish adults with severe-profound hearing impairment?. Br J Audiol 2000; 34(3)187–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hétu R. Mismatches between auditory demands and capacities in the industrial work environment. Audiology 1994; 33: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houtgast T., Steeneken H.J.M. The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Acustica 1973; 28: 66–73
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S., et al. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol 2003; 42(2)S92–101
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E. 2006. Hearing at work: how do we deal with that? CD-rom information package for professionals, patients, and significant others. Report. VU University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Allessie G.H., Dondorp A.W., Zekveld A.A., Kapteyn T.S. A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: A randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol 2005; 44(5)255–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M., Kuik D.J. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. Audiology 1997; 36: 155–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Houtgast T. Occupational performance: Comparing normally hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam checklist for hearing and work. Int J Audiol 2006; 45(9)503–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M., Tobi H. The relationship between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability. Audiology 1996; 35: 277–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May J.J. Occupational hearing loss. Am J Ind Med 2000; 37(1)112–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L.B., Knol D., Zekveld A.A., Goverts S.T. & S.E. Kramer Factor structure and reliability of the Dutch version of seven scale of Communication Profile for the Tearing Impaired (CPHI) J Speech Language hear. Submitted ms.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Allessie G.H., Dondorp A.W., Zekveld A.A., Kapteyn T.S. A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: A randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol 2005; 44(5)255–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata T.C., Themann C.L., Randolph R.F., Verbsky B.L., Byrne D.C., et al. Working in noise with a hearing loss: Perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear 2005; 26(6)529–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D.I., Nelson R.Y., Concha-Barrientos M., Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med 2005; 48: 446–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parving A., Christensen B. Training and employment in hearing-impaired subjects at 20–35 years of age. Scan Audiol 1993; 2: 133–9
   Google Scholar
• Palmer K.T., Griffin M.J., Sydall H.E., Davis A., Pannett B., et al. Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain. Occ Environ Med 2002; 59(9)634–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing-aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif 2006; 10: 29–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruben J.R. Redefining the survival of the fittest: Communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 241–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner M., Foo D., Rönnberg J., Lunner T. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing. Ear Hear 2007; 28(6)879–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherich D.L., Mowry R. Job accommodations in the workplace for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing: Current practices and recommendations. J Rehab 1997; 62(2)27–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorgdrager B., Kramer S.E., Dreschler W.A. Terreinverkenning. Trends in de Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. (Trends in Occupational Health Care), A.N.H. Van Weel. Bohn Stafleu en Van Loghum, Houten 2006; 10–11
   Google Scholar
• Stephens D.A. Audiological rehabilitation.2003. In: L. Luxon, J.M. Furman, A. Martini, D. Stephens Textbook of Audiological Medicine: Clinical Aspects of Hearing and Balance. London: Martin Dunitz, pp. 513–531.
   Google Scholar