Development of speech intelligibility and narrative abilities and their interrelationship three and five years after paediatric cochlear implantation

References

• Allen M.C., Nikolopoulos T.P., O'Donohgue G.M. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 742–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aram D., Most T., Mayafit H. Contributions of mother-child storybook telling and joint writing to literacy development in kindergartners with hearing loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006; 37: 209–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold S., Nikolopoulos T.P., Tait M., O'Donoghue G.M., Lutman M.E., et al. Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 257–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botting N. Narrative as a tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments. Child Lang Teach Ther 2002; 18: 1–21
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology (1988). British Society of Audiology recommendation. Descriptors for pure-tone audiograms. Technical Note. Br J Audiol, 22, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Chain K., Oakhill J. The nature of the relationship between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story. Br J Devel Psychol 1996; 14: 187–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin B., Finnegan K.R. & Chung B.A. 2001. Relationships among types of speech intelligibility in pediatric users of cochlear implants. J Commun Disord, 187–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin S.B., Tsai P.L., Gao S. Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12: 440–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad R. The Deaf Schoolchild. Language and Cognitive Function. Harper & Row, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Crosson N., Geers A. Analysis of narrative ability in children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 381–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen P., Jr., Colvard L.G. Intelligibility of conversational speech produced by children with cochlear implants. J Comm Disord 2005; 39: 93–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortnum H.M., Marshall D.H., Summerfield A.Q. Epidemiology of the UK population of hearing-impaired children, including characteristics of those with and without cochlear implants: Audiology, aetiology, comorbidity and affluence. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 170–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gift A. Visual analogue scales: Measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989; 38: 286–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Brannan M., Williams Hodson B. Intelligibility/severity measurements of prekindergarten children. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2000; 9: 141–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey C.D., Hosie J.A. Deafness, story understanding, and theory of mind. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1996; 1: 217–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huttunen K. 2000. Early Childhood Hearing Impairment: Speech Intelligibility and Late Outcome. Academic dissertation. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, B 35. Oulu: University of Oulu.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen K., Sorri M. Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 490–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttunen K., Sorri M. & Välimaa T. 2003. Parents’ views of their children's habilitation after cochlear implantation. In: Measuring the Immeasurable? Proceedings of a Conference on Quality of Life in Deaf Children. Nottingham, UK, 17 May 2002. Oxford: Hughes Associates, pp. 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Markides A. The Speech of the Hearing Impaired Children. Manchester University Press, Manchester 1983
   Google Scholar
• McGarr N. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 26: 451–8
   Google Scholar
• Mondain M., Sillon M., Vieu A., Lanvin M., Reuillard-Artieres F., et al. Speech perception skills and speech production intelligibility in French children with prelingual deafness and cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123: 181–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos T., Lioumi D., Stamataki S., O'Donoghue G.M., Guest M. , et al 2006. Evidence-based overview of ophthalmic disorders in deaf children: A literature update. Otol Neurotol, 27, Suppl 1, S1–S24.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos T., Lloyd H., Starczewski H., Gallaway C. Using SNAP Dragons to monitor narrative abilities in young deaf children following cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67: 535–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos T., O'Donoghue G.M., Archbold S. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 595–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue G.M., Nikolopoulos T.P., Archbold S., Tait M. Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 419–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M.J. Speech intelligibility in the hearing impaired: Research and clinical implications. Intelligibility in Speech Disorders. Theory, Measurement, and Management, R.D. Kent. John Benjamin's Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 1982; 233–264
   Google Scholar
• Pakulski L.A., Kaderavek J.N. Narrative production by children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing: The effect of role play. Volta Rev 2003; 103: 127–39
   Google Scholar
• Paul R., Hernandez R., Taylor L., Johnson K. Narrative development in late talkers: Early school age. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 1295–1303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng S.C., Spencer L., Tomblin B. Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with seven years of device experience. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 6: 1227–36
   Google Scholar
• Peterson C.C. Kindred spirits: Influences of siblings’ perspectives on theory of mind. Cogn Devel 2000; 15: 435–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson C.C., Slaughter V.P. Telling the story of theory of mind: Deaf and hearing children's narratives and mental state understanding. Br J Dev Psychol 2006; 24: 151–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece A. The range of narrative forms conversationally produced by young children. J Child Lang 1987; 17: 353–73
   Google Scholar
• Rajput K., Brown T., Bamiou D-E. Aetiology of hearing loss and related factors versus language outcome after cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67: 497–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remes K. Artikulaatiotesti. Kuvakortisto puheenkehityksen ja äännevirheisyyden tutkimiseen ja tarkkailuun. Koulun Erityispalvelu, Helsinki 1975
   Google Scholar
• Schubi Material, 1988. Papa Moll. Treasure chest of pictures series. Schaffhausen: SCHUBI Lehrmittel.
   Google Scholar
• Smith C. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. J Speech Hear Res 1975; 18: 795–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starczewski H., Lloyd Richmond H. Using the stories/narrative assessment procedure (SNAP) to monitor language and communication changes after a cochlear implant: A case study. Deaf Educ Int 1999; 1: 137–54
   Google Scholar
• Starczewski H., Lloyd Richmond H. & England R. 2003. Snap assessment. RCSLT Bull, September, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stein N.L. & Glenn C. 1979. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In: R.O. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing. Vol 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 53–120.
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky M.A., Chin S.B., Jester A. The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: Clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audiol Med 2007; 5: 293–306
   Google Scholar
• Tobey E.A., Geers A.E., Brenner C., Altuna D., Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 36S–45S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevers M.E., Lowe N.K. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar